Full Transcript (5421 lines)
00:00:00
Thank you.
00:00:00
A gringo. Be.
00:00:27
This week's parody suggestion.
00:00:29
Brought to you by our host Gary.
00:00:32
I did suggest it.
00:00:33
we jump down the garden for a gay old time.
00:00:39
Tommy grabs his basket with his thumb.
00:00:42
The three words I didn't tell you.
00:00:43
Captain giggles is leg hook time.
00:00:47
If it is, can we join?
00:00:49
I want to come dancing.
00:00:51
The wicked try.
00:00:56
Don't think we're not.
00:00:58
Come in quick.
00:01:00
Dunk our feet.
00:01:01
Start to slow the floor.
00:01:04
No, you sing something after that chick sing.
00:01:08
It's a mistake.
00:01:17
It's a mistake.
00:01:21
It's a mistake.
00:01:26
It's a mistake.
00:01:30
We. Shake it for sure.
00:01:37
The cheeky, cringey swipe for the eggs
00:01:41
while the slick hunters cry up to the giggles in the wild.
00:01:46
Chase me.
00:01:48
Oh, Johnny basket was completely dry.
00:01:53
I didn't try to say I didn't see.
00:01:57
Don't blame the
00:01:58
grass for hiding the trees sneaky.
00:02:02
Faster I left one, two three left.
00:02:05
Jelly bean scatter to Tommy's feet.
00:02:09
Said it's a mistake.
00:02:13
It's a mistake.
00:02:17
It's a mistake.
00:02:22
It's a mistake.
00:02:27
Just too many giggles.
00:02:30
What do you say?
00:02:32
Because we know you love.
00:02:33
Your smiling frown.
00:02:35
Is the big heart on our fading cake.
00:02:40
We wish you'd hop up and turn it around.
00:02:50
Tommy won't quit.
00:02:51
He's brave as can be.
00:02:54
Not in the sunny, chocolaty.
00:02:57
Oh well.
00:02:58
He whistles a tune I can't feel.
00:03:01
Tree to stop the fox a secret hideout.
00:03:05
I was saying it's a mess. And.
00:03:12
It's a mistake.
00:03:16
It's a mistake.
00:03:21
It's a mistake.
00:03:27
Then Tommy shows in a triumphant big fox.
00:03:31
You rascal.
00:03:32
Your game is done.
00:03:35
He jiggles the villain till he drops every egg.
00:03:39
And all the eggs roll out one by one.
00:03:42
Wait, what?
00:03:43
The kids, don't you?
00:03:45
Until the sharks sneaky fox
00:03:48
loves and shares the lost from the law.
00:03:51
Moral of the story never let a sly fox sell you a fat non-sequitur.
00:03:57
Just hunt with giggles and a brave
00:04:02
heart out on you.
00:04:07
It's a mistake, it's
00:04:09
a mistake.
00:04:13
It's a mistake to stay up home.
00:04:18
Stay.
00:04:21
It's a mistake,
00:04:23
it's a mistake, it's a mistake.
00:04:27
It's up.
00:04:29
Stay.
00:04:32
It's up.
00:04:36
Missed. Hey!
00:04:43
The following is for entertainment purposes only.
00:04:46
It's just a scripted comedy show.
00:04:49
These guys are not experts, doctors,
00:04:52
lawyers, therapists, or even particularly well-adjusted.
00:04:57
Everything you hear is opinion, exaggeration, sarcasm,
00:05:01
or just plain nonsense.
00:05:02
Any resemblance to real people events is purely coincidental and kind of hilarious.
00:05:07
They are not a responsible for emotional damage, cognitive
00:05:11
dissonance, spontaneous enlightenment,
00:05:14
or sudden urge to start a cult.
00:05:17
Pure discretion is advised, especially
00:05:20
if you're prone to taking things too seriously.
00:05:22
This is a late show.
00:05:24
It's not for kids.
00:05:25
Your boss or Karen from H.R.
00:05:27
will be hearing about this. By the way.
00:05:29
Hi, Dave.
00:05:30
Side effects may include thinking, laughing,
00:05:34
or yelling at your screen.
00:05:37
Fladge Rants Live is filmed in front of a live studio
00:05:40
audience. And.
00:06:33
I got to play the Easter
00:06:34
Bunny at my family Easter gathering.
00:06:38
I did the edits and the kids went and found them.
00:06:42
And we may have had a mistake
00:06:43
because our Easter bunny doesn't have very good memory.
00:06:47
Hi, I'm Gary, and welcome to Fladge Rants Live,
00:06:51
our sesquicentennial show.
00:06:55
This is a big one.
00:06:58
This is our pirate
00:07:01
show, named after King Pirate,
00:07:05
reference, who successfully defeated
00:07:09
the Roman army on several nonconsecutive occasions.
00:07:13
But at what cost?
00:07:16
At the end of this, third
00:07:18
successful battle against the Roman army,
00:07:21
I believe, King,
00:07:25
Pyrrhus said
00:07:28
we can't afford another victory.
00:07:32
And,
00:07:34
we've been doing the show a long time, and, we started out on the disc
00:07:37
golf course, just chit chat, and we said, oh, shouldn't we record this?
00:07:42
And, and the conversation would be Andrew, go here, there in the other place.
00:07:47
And that's basically how, like, raise these monologues is,
00:07:51
is that my, my own scatterbrained,
00:07:54
approach to these things?
00:07:56
But the current events are,
00:07:59
of course, going to be on our minds.
00:08:02
The, Artemis two mission is has just completed
00:08:07
its, orbit around the the far side of the moon
00:08:12
and, the the Orion capsule
00:08:16
is carrying, four astronauts.
00:08:20
The the
00:08:22
mission commander,
00:08:24
Reid Wiseman.
00:08:25
Now, Wiseman has got a special significance to this show,
00:08:29
but also sounds kind of Jewish.
00:08:31
Victor Glover's the,
00:08:34
African American pilot.
00:08:40
The first woman
00:08:42
to be on the far side of the moon.
00:08:44
Christina Cooke
00:08:47
and Jeremy Hansen of the Canadian Space Agency.
00:08:51
In related news, there is a Canadian space agency,
00:08:56
so we'll get a lot more into that.
00:08:59
But, if you want to look up, flag.
00:09:05
You'd probably
00:09:06
be autocorrect to do a real word like flange, which is a,
00:09:09
protruding lip, ridge or rim, usually metal.
00:09:14
And the answer most people give to the question,
00:09:18
what holds train
00:09:21
tire, train wheels on train tracks and.
00:09:28
I want to say this is false, but it's.
00:09:33
It's partially true.
00:09:34
But the brilliant piece of engineering
00:09:38
that goes into keeping a train on its tracks isn't the flange
00:09:43
on the wheel that that would stop it from leaving the track,
00:09:48
but if it was rubbing the whole time,
00:09:51
it the heat would build up and the
00:09:54
the wheels would melt and it would be unsafe.
00:09:57
So the brilliant piece of engineering that I'm talking about
00:10:01
is the conical shaped wheel itself now.
00:10:04
And the rail is it's got a slight curve.
00:10:08
If you look at the the top of the, train tracks,
00:10:13
the, the rails themselves, it's very slight.
00:10:17
But bubble
00:10:20
on the top, they're not flat across.
00:10:23
And that is because okay,
00:10:25
so if you got fixed wheels,
00:10:28
attached to an axle, single piece,
00:10:31
like they all move together and you turn
00:10:35
that.
00:10:37
Therein lies the rub.
00:10:39
Then one wheel's going further than the other one.
00:10:43
How do you compensate for this?
00:10:45
Well, if you've ever been on a train, you'll feel it rocking back and forth.
00:10:49
That is on purpose.
00:10:50
That is intentional.
00:10:52
It it it does that for the skipping part.
00:10:56
So does it build up that heat that I was talking about.
00:10:59
But so so the conical shape
00:11:02
is thick towards the middle and thinner towards the outside.
00:11:06
The flange of course keeps it from going all the way off
00:11:09
and it keeps it balanced in the middle.
00:11:12
And it's got that sway to it.
00:11:15
So that
00:11:17
you can safely ride on a train
00:11:20
without it derailing too frequently,
00:11:24
or without that heat building up.
00:11:26
So that's, that's some flange news that most people don't know.
00:11:32
People think that the flange is so thin holding the the train on the tracks.
00:11:36
Not true.
00:11:37
It's flat.
00:11:41
Just to keep with my buckshot.
00:11:43
I wrote this down because it's important.
00:11:46
Morality is what you do when nobody is watching.
00:11:49
I've said it before, but I'm saying it again.
00:11:51
Following rules to avoid punishment or seek reward is obedience.
00:11:55
It's submission.
00:12:00
This this is important, and I'll come back later.
00:12:02
I also want to talk about Baalbek.
00:12:05
It's the Heliopolis complex.
00:12:09
The Temple of Jupiter is, obvious
00:12:12
Roman imperial construction with the Corinthian columns.
00:12:17
But you go around the side
00:12:20
and you'll come across what's known as the Troll of Thorn.
00:12:24
And, if you say it wrong, try.
00:12:27
Listen.
00:12:28
Then you realize that it just means three stones.
00:12:32
But these three stones
00:12:35
are 600 to 800 tons.
00:12:39
These are gargantuan.
00:12:42
And they were built before the Romans got there.
00:12:46
And that is not what history tells us. What
00:12:50
what mainstream archeology tells us is the Romans put those there
00:12:55
to build their Colosseum, that they're their big temple to Jupiter.
00:13:01
Well, it is obvious that
00:13:04
that that is Roman construction on top of the troll.
00:13:06
The thorn stones.
00:13:09
But in the quarry, not far away from there,
00:13:13
there is another big rectangular
00:13:17
block
00:13:19
of stone
00:13:21
that was never removed from its spot,
00:13:25
that is over
00:13:27
1000 tons and.
00:13:32
If you believe that
00:13:33
the Romans were ambitious enough that the cut that
00:13:37
you are mistaken
00:13:39
and got naked and went out to a quarry.
00:13:44
We did.
00:13:46
I also want to talk about the King list.
00:13:50
But let's go with,
00:13:52
So something I learned this week was Zipf's law.
00:13:56
Zipf's Zipf's law.
00:14:00
And that is
00:14:02
in speech in normal, parlance,
00:14:07
the most commonly used word
00:14:10
and and the the next few most common
00:14:14
words, is on
00:14:19
and those are the really commonly used words.
00:14:24
The most common
00:14:26
is used twice as much as the second
00:14:28
most common, according to the zip slot
00:14:31
a third, a third, the fourth,
00:14:35
you know, or lower this fourth, the fifth is a fifth.
00:14:39
And it and it works like that.
00:14:42
That's how it just works out.
00:14:46
It's strange how these things just work out.
00:14:50
The another,
00:14:54
current
00:14:56
news item is, if you look at the craters of the moon,
00:15:00
the most common size of crater on the moon
00:15:06
is twice as common as the second most.
00:15:12
And three times
00:15:13
as much as the third and four times as much as the fourth, etc.
00:15:17
these are related to Benford's law,
00:15:20
Benford's law.
00:15:24
Tells us that
00:15:26
one is the first digit of more numbers than it should be.
00:15:31
Now think about it.
00:15:33
Well, you once you get through one through 20, you start with one,
00:15:38
ten, 11, 12, all the way through 19, all start with one.
00:15:42
So now you're looking at more than half.
00:15:44
So one's got a jump start on everybody.
00:15:48
And once you get through
00:15:50
to 200 then you know
00:15:53
you're looking at more than half.
00:15:57
But in the grand scheme of things, when you get a ton of numbers,
00:16:03
then you should have a fairly even distribution.
00:16:07
No, not according to Benford's law.
00:16:11
And, it doesn't work the same way.
00:16:13
The, the one third, one quarter, the one, the one fifth thing,
00:16:17
but it is disproportionately,
00:16:20
skewed towards one
00:16:23
and two gets more than its fair
00:16:25
share as well.
00:16:29
The, the parietal distribution.
00:16:34
I wish I could remember what the potato distribution was.
00:16:38
Oh, yeah.
00:16:39
I looked it up.
00:16:42
Hopefully it's still on the screen.
00:16:43
It is not the potato distribution.
00:16:49
Dagnabbit.
00:16:50
I should write these things down.
00:16:51
Then the back is a skewed heavy tailed power law probability
00:16:57
distribution used to model unequal distribution
00:16:59
such as wealth, income, and file sizes, where a small percentage of causes
00:17:02
20% produces a large percentage of effects 80%.
00:17:06
It is defined by a scale per parameter and a shape parameter.
00:17:12
Thank you Brady.
00:17:14
What a fantastic producer.
00:17:16
And I just I brought that up because it's related to Zipf's law.
00:17:18
And I learned about the plot this week and then Benford's law, the
00:17:22
the Parado distribution.
00:17:23
But what I really wanted to talk about today was the the summer reading list.
00:17:28
Now summary King list.
00:17:30
Oh. What I wanted to do, since it's 150 shows in, is
00:17:34
I wanted to go through each of the 150
00:17:38
authors and spend 10s I need to that.
00:17:41
I did the math on that.
00:17:42
It's it's too much. So,
00:17:46
you know, Giza cuneiform,
00:17:49
megaliths, cryptids, all of it.
00:17:53
I wanted to do all of it, because here we are, ordered 50 shows in,
00:17:58
but at what cost?
00:18:01
That's where pirate comes in.
00:18:03
Well,
00:18:05
let's go back to the Sumerian King List.
00:18:08
This is cuneiform tablets, and there's
00:18:11
there are hundreds of them.
00:18:13
It's almost like they were practicing with the Sumerian King
00:18:17
List and performing cuneiform,
00:18:20
because they are copied and they are precise
00:18:24
and they match each other.
00:18:26
And there are very few exceptions to that.
00:18:28
Like they're the outliers are clearly mistakes.
00:18:32
But here's the thing.
00:18:34
They show the.
00:18:38
The rule of certain monarchs
00:18:42
throughout Mesopotamia.
00:18:44
So this is that's in kings.
00:18:50
Dating back
00:18:52
hundreds, hundreds of thousands of years.
00:18:55
But some of these reigns
00:18:58
were tens of thousands of years. Now.
00:19:02
People don't live tens of thousands of years.
00:19:04
Then there was a steep drop off, the Great Flood.
00:19:11
Plenty of flood
00:19:12
myths going around, and there's evidence of flooding in that region.
00:19:16
And during that
00:19:17
era, the Younger Dryas event.
00:19:20
Well,
00:19:22
a pretty Younger Dryas event.
00:19:23
In fact, the song of the Ice Age,
00:19:27
water levels rose, but
00:19:30
let's let's look at all of the possibilities here.
00:19:34
What mainstream
00:19:38
academics tells us
00:19:40
is that this is a blending between mythology and history.
00:19:44
So pre-flood it's mythology.
00:19:48
Post-Flood is real people.
00:19:51
What the Kings list is telling us
00:19:53
is that these rulers from Pre-Flood
00:19:57
came from the heavens.
00:19:59
So deities or extraterrestrials,
00:20:04
we don't have to decide.
00:20:07
Let's throw out all the options.
00:20:09
Let's see.
00:20:12
So so that's one, one, one possibility.
00:20:15
We were ruled by extraterrestrials, and then they handed off
00:20:19
rulership to ourselves. Let us rule ourselves.
00:20:22
And that's that was the reason for the huge drop off in years.
00:20:26
Option B,
00:20:28
deities, they were supernatural gods.
00:20:31
They were a pantheon of actual gods with supernatural powers,
00:20:36
and they were immortal and could only be killed by each other.
00:20:39
And they ruled.
00:20:40
And then the same they handed off to us after the flood.
00:20:46
How about this one?
00:20:48
It wasn't, it's more along the lines
00:20:51
of the mythology, turn to history.
00:20:56
But how about
00:20:58
celestial events
00:21:00
and or celestial eras?
00:21:05
Because these people paid a lot of attention
00:21:08
to what was going on in the skies.
00:21:11
And maybe they were just talking
00:21:13
about the movement of the heavenly bodies, which takes thousands of years.
00:21:18
And they had unbelievable amounts of information about this.
00:21:22
But in the flood myth
00:21:26
from us, from Tamia,
00:21:28
they very specifically said they passed along
00:21:32
books or knowledge
00:21:34
of these astrological astronomical,
00:21:40
cycles, and they passed that along.
00:21:44
And the few survivors from these catastrophic events
00:21:49
passed that along with some agricultural information
00:21:52
and some, language mathematics calendar.
00:21:58
So maybe
00:22:01
maybe it wasn't people
00:22:03
they were talking about, but celestial bodies.
00:22:07
And that would make more sense with the the tens of thousands of year rule, the
00:22:11
the rains that were just,
00:22:13
astronomical numbers.
00:22:16
Maybe it was astronomical.
00:22:19
So, I guess I've, I've ruined this monologue.
00:22:25
Enough.
00:22:25
Roll the clip.
00:22:26
Brady.
00:22:30
And that was a great monologue.
00:22:32
Let's see what God thinks about.
00:22:38
Anthony.
00:22:38
That was a great monologue.
00:22:49
And that was a great monologue.
00:22:53
Before the.
00:22:54
I guess it was those invincible and destined for glory.
00:22:58
They encountered a great enemy.
00:23:00
Pyrrhus.
00:23:01
King of Epirus, a region of Greece.
00:23:04
During the conflict known as the Pyrrhic Wars, the king led his Greek
00:23:07
phalanxes to fight on Italian territory against the Roman legions.
00:23:12
He defeated his dreaded enemies in the battles of Heraklion and Eclipse.
00:23:16
However, these victories cost the lives of most of his soldiers,
00:23:20
weakening his army and damaging his ambitions.
00:23:24
After seeing his men celebrating their victory,
00:23:26
he said the sentence one more victory like this and we will be lost.
00:23:32
These events do the term Pyrrhic victory.
00:23:35
Use when a victory is achieved at such a costly price
00:23:39
that his damage may be irreparable to the winning side.
00:23:44
The fate of 150 shall be.
00:23:50
Ours still allowed to suck.
00:23:53
So, a Jewish sounding
00:23:56
mission commander, a black pilot,
00:24:00
a female astronaut and a Canadian astronaut.
00:24:04
It sounds like the beginning of a joke for the D1 Kosh.
00:24:07
And we're taking leave.
00:24:08
We've got breaking news here.
00:24:09
We've got a live phone call from somebody to the Artemis two.
00:24:16
Who's calling?
00:24:19
Is it us?
00:24:20
I don't know, do you hear it? I don't hear anything.
00:24:22
I don't hear it at all.
00:24:23
But I will say Artemis is a great name for a rocket ship.
00:24:28
It is a horrid name for a human being.
00:24:29
I don't understand people who name their kids Artemis.
00:24:32
Is that an actual name?
00:24:33
I never heard that name. Yeah. This?
00:24:35
Yeah.
00:24:35
Check that out.
00:24:36
This is the mission. The rocket ships called Orion.
00:24:40
Artemis.
00:24:40
Administrator.
00:24:41
They're there in the Orion capsule.
00:24:44
I don't understand why they did the capsule.
00:24:46
What they will do when they do a black check.
00:24:48
That way they just knock two out with one, and then we can have.
00:24:51
Right now, they covered all their bases.
00:24:54
So you look at it, a Jewish sounding
00:24:58
guy, a black man, female astronaut.
00:25:01
And the Canadian rocket walks into a bar.
00:25:03
Sounds like a just.
00:25:05
You're right.
00:25:05
Years ago and
00:25:07
is everyone going to shit on these people now because they're all smiling, like.
00:25:11
So. That's funny you say that.
00:25:12
The toilet is not working.
00:25:13
Technically. They're all shitting on each other.
00:25:16
Yeah, yeah, rocket nest as it is currently.
00:25:19
You can still. But man, the toilets broken.
00:25:22
You can poo in it, but you can't pee in it because the pee is freezing.
00:25:27
America is a.
00:25:28
Did you know somebody forgot to figure it was cold in space?
00:25:31
Astronauts have.
00:25:32
It's not cold in space.
00:25:34
Trump just said astronauts.
00:25:36
Yeah, he's oh my God.
00:25:37
That dimension setting in hardcore.
00:25:39
Oh wow. I'm just glad he's alive.
00:25:42
He barely says the only thing he barely mistakes.
00:25:45
Like a syllable.
00:25:46
Like, oh my God, he's awake.
00:25:48
Meanwhile, Joe Biden was full retard.
00:25:50
They were like, no, no, no, he's just fine. It's very soon.
00:25:53
Wow. They're really nailing the zero gravity effect on this.
00:25:56
Mission.
00:25:57
Oh, this hoax.
00:25:59
And we're going to get to that I.
00:26:01
The flag is smaller than the American presence.
00:26:04
So I did I did reach out to, President Trump on that.
00:26:08
I'm waiting for that.
00:26:09
Yeah,
00:26:10
I had noticed that when I was in Detroit, the, we used to have, like a 1500 foot
00:26:15
flag on the old Hudson's building, but now they call it the Great Canadian flag.
00:26:19
And it's it's bigger than any American flag I've ever seen.
00:26:21
And then we have these tiny little flags.
00:26:23
And outside of the, rensin across the river and
00:26:27
and the this the Canadian one dwarfs the American one.
00:26:30
It's just gigantic.
00:26:31
So I thought if Trump found out and needs to let you know that they're there
00:26:34
because nobody really cares, they're like, hey, remember I agreed,
00:26:37
but don't you think once Trump finds out, we're here, he's going to put his
00:26:42
big dick energy or whatever they call it, as kind of gave me to say.
00:26:45
But we're on Rumble eternally.
00:26:47
We're on YouTube. I need to remind myself of that.
00:26:50
I did know that there was a Canadian space agency,
00:26:53
because I remember there was a Chris Hadfield that stayed
00:26:57
on the International Space Station for like 280 days.
00:27:01
And, he played international, acoustic guitar
00:27:04
live with the Barenaked Ladies from the International Space Station.
00:27:08
That sounds fucking boring.
00:27:10
The near side of the moon, seeing all the sights
00:27:12
that we've seen from Earth for all of our lives.
00:27:14
But we're seeing that there was actually bare naked ladies.
00:27:17
And that could be right, right, right.
00:27:19
No. Wouldn't you be disappointed
00:27:21
if you were to go see the bare naked ladies and fully dressed?
00:27:24
They're like, dude, they totally play me, man,
00:27:26
I, I have, I have went to see if they're naked.
00:27:30
Drummer you have gone to see conjugation verbs.
00:27:33
Really?
00:27:34
I have had gone to see them that we were watching.
00:27:37
We could see in the past and the present.
00:27:39
We can see their name, one of their head songs
00:27:41
right now, without thinking too hard.
00:27:42
Go can, If I had $1 million to watch this new nation in this planet,
00:27:47
my favorite one is everything's all been done before, some I don't
00:27:50
that's not exactly name, but
00:27:52
it's for people that say, oh, that song sounds like that than that song.
00:27:55
I mean, dude, there's only like three notes, right?
00:27:57
Decision is, is that the parody?
00:27:59
Next we have it no more.
00:28:02
Should we parody it with this?
00:28:04
Get them, get the lyrics wrong and it's really great.
00:28:08
Just do the lyrics that you just said instead of the real title. Me.
00:28:12
But I was not.
00:28:13
Yes, even a question in my own mind.
00:28:15
Okay, we just oh my lord.
00:28:17
But no, what we had to do.
00:28:20
Well, there's a mistake in space forces.
00:28:22
I can't believe it worked.
00:28:23
Like I suggested a parody, and it it was a good song.
00:28:27
I liked it, it did.
00:28:28
The hardest part was making it's a mistake.
00:28:30
Sound like it's a mistake.
00:28:31
And I must say, I nailed it.
00:28:34
So we're very rigid.
00:28:35
You totally nailed it. I feel bad for Tommy.
00:28:38
Well, I felt bad for Tommy until it all worked out in the end.
00:28:41
You told the story. It was so good.
00:28:44
I mean, I'm crying over here, so it even gets better.
00:28:47
You know, the, I heard your, shitter is broken.
00:28:51
Have you.
00:28:52
Have you seen the actual video for that song?
00:28:55
I think one of the biggest highlights.
00:28:56
It's stop motion claymation.
00:28:59
So the video was actually a spoof
00:29:01
of the video to being out of communication for about for this woman.
00:29:05
So grab her by the pussy.
00:29:07
I don't know what she's doing on this ship.
00:29:09
It is for our nation to be careful.
00:29:11
We're still on YouTube.
00:29:12
We're trying to, You can take us, right?
00:29:14
Yeah. The algorithm.
00:29:18
And I think you put the ad up is the worst.
00:29:21
No communication to zero communication.
00:29:25
All of a sudden it was obviously zero.
00:29:28
Very special location, zero communication.
00:29:31
So he's complaining that the woman has zero communication skills.
00:29:36
There's no he was complaining that they couldn't hear him until
00:29:39
after they got to the dark side of the far side of the moon.
00:29:42
Oh, yeah.
00:29:43
How are they getting back, man? Talk?
00:29:45
Because I was actually recording scientific observations
00:29:49
of the far side of the moon. You know, that is actually.
00:29:51
I thought you were a pilot. What did he say?
00:29:53
Oh, they were they were piloting scientific observation scientists.
00:29:57
Our most detailed observations, of the far side of the moon up close.
00:30:01
And so assholes got to watch is really hard.
00:30:03
And I must say, it was actually quite nice
00:30:06
because he's that you see three.
00:30:08
I'm sorry.
00:30:09
She has three watches and she's easy, I know.
00:30:12
Why would she have three watches?
00:30:14
A difference in feel and later in New York time and
00:30:20
then we are
00:30:22
So they're aging different than us.
00:30:24
I, I have a video about that. It's an hour and a half long.
00:30:26
I'm not sure how
00:30:27
we're going to go over it, but I so want to go, oh, we'll get to it.
00:30:30
And what they thought we might see, and the gravitational
00:30:34
pull of the Earth has had a big role in.
00:30:38
So this is their live.
00:30:39
This is NASA's live feed to make us, I mean, to show us what they're doing.
00:30:44
Yeah.
00:30:46
U of M a is still up by, nine, by the way, then.
00:30:49
Oh, I forgot they're even playing, so you can that
00:30:53
championship
00:30:54
Yukon Huskies player can go fuck himself.
00:30:58
Who can? Who can? Yeah.
00:30:59
I think it's interesting that UConn is the University
00:31:03
of Connecticut, nowhere near the Yukon.
00:31:07
What Huskies are kind of known for being in the Yukon?
00:31:10
Yeah, there's a whole bit about it.
00:31:14
Oh, okay.
00:31:14
So you're saying that Yukon here, if you didn't know.
00:31:18
No. Right. Well, never.
00:31:20
Mission control in Houston, Texas, we just write that
00:31:25
right.
00:31:28
Oh we're going to get I'm going to get banned by Shona.
00:31:30
Not going to see big.
00:31:31
Yeah. There's a husky too big.
00:31:33
It's too big.
00:31:36
43 to 50.
00:31:37
You you can't see shit on that. At least on mine.
00:31:40
Maybe you can on the other feed.
00:31:42
I picked Arizona to beat Michigan.
00:31:45
So, I lost my rule.
00:31:47
I picked Arizona to win it all.
00:31:49
Yeah, yeah, I did too.
00:31:53
Yeah, that last that last game.
00:31:54
Yeah. Looking good.
00:31:56
He hurt himself, and he decided to keep playing, even though he sucked.
00:32:00
And he was a step behind.
00:32:01
And then he's still playing, and he said, yeah, I suck, I'm a step behind.
00:32:04
And he's still playing.
00:32:05
Luckily they're up because if they lose, it's like, definitely on him.
00:32:08
I get being like the star player.
00:32:11
And you know, this is the final Four game you potentially are going to
00:32:15
getting drafted. You know who knows that.
00:32:17
But yeah, it just kind of shows how shitty of a player and an asshole you are.
00:32:22
I think they fix perfect.
00:32:23
Everybody's complaining about college sports,
00:32:25
but I think they fixed it with the nil because now they're going to stay there.
00:32:29
They have a chance of making way more money and,
00:32:31
you know, going off for years to fruition and just collecting that Nil money
00:32:34
before they even may not get into the the pros
00:32:37
is, is there normally as many Euro players because it it seems like there's
00:32:42
I try to use U.S.
00:32:44
dollars I don't know what you're talking about.
00:32:46
Euros European I don't know what that means.
00:32:48
A euro step is that traveling I love euros, I'm just saying, like gyro.
00:32:52
Gyro.
00:32:53
I usually pronounce it gyros, though. Hero.
00:32:57
Everything I know about Greek basketball is on.
00:32:59
I topped with a local Columbus.
00:33:01
What's his name?
00:33:04
Stephanopoulos.
00:33:07
Oh, shit. The NASA screens.
00:33:08
No, you go anywhere.
00:33:09
I might as well close that out.
00:33:11
Geez.
00:33:15
They are going a thousand miles an hour
00:33:17
just to find a police.
00:33:20
Oh, they're back on.
00:33:23
So I can't believe you did.
00:33:26
So while you were the Easter Bunny, did you remind the kids
00:33:29
that God is not real?
00:33:32
Oh, okay.
00:33:33
So here's the thing about honesty.
00:33:36
It is important to be honest.
00:33:39
But say,
00:33:41
your
00:33:44
grandmother is on her deathbed, and it's the barge in there
00:33:48
and tell her that she's going to die and there's no afterlife.
00:33:51
Is immoral.
00:33:55
That is, there's
00:33:56
no reason to be cruel about it.
00:34:01
But why are you following me?
00:34:06
So you're saying that
00:34:08
lying about eternity is okay as long as it's for comfort?
00:34:13
I'm not.
00:34:14
I'm not even suggesting lying.
00:34:15
I'm saying don't blurred it out.
00:34:18
What if she asks? You?
00:34:20
Tell me. Carry. Comfort me.
00:34:22
Give me confidence that I will be with my Lord
00:34:24
on the right hand and spend eternity in Paradise.
00:34:27
Please tell me. Tell me now. What do you say? I can't do that.
00:34:30
I couldn't, I couldn't do it, I can't, I could not ask Hawk.
00:34:34
That's for you in the Lord.
00:34:35
I know, I know, I know, I know, it's it's
00:34:38
like, Do does do I look fat in this dress?
00:34:45
Lab coat.
00:34:45
But. Yes.
00:34:46
So, Yeah. Yeah, definitely.
00:34:49
You look fat. Your fat lab coat look silly.
00:34:52
Know your fat makes your fat look silly.
00:34:55
Okay, but
00:34:58
you get my fat.
00:34:59
Make this lab look fat.
00:35:02
It makes it look white.
00:35:03
This is an incredible shot.
00:35:06
You're not even going to believe what happens here.
00:35:09
Watch this.
00:35:11
Skip, skip.
00:35:13
Roll roll.
00:35:15
Because an alligator love.
00:35:18
It's like it's. And that's it.
00:35:19
Try to tune in to rumble to see the rest.
00:35:21
Not. Yep.
00:35:23
Nice cliffhanger.
00:35:25
Wait the holes way over there and the balls way down here.
00:35:28
The hole is up. I know ball is down here.
00:35:31
There's no way it's going in.
00:35:32
But could it be the shot of the century if it doesn't go in?
00:35:37
Yeah.
00:35:38
Yeah, it could be like a hanger. Hanger.
00:35:42
No, it has to go in
00:35:44
anger.
00:35:45
Oh, I heard someone say sing.
00:35:47
So I don't play golf singing.
00:35:49
I ask a stupid question.
00:35:52
You usually do two questions. One.
00:35:56
Did he do that on purpose?
00:35:58
No, he in two.
00:36:01
Why didn't he just hit it over the water?
00:36:03
There's any.
00:36:04
Because over my experience with physics, anytime a ball hits something,
00:36:08
there's more chances of it doing something chaotic.
00:36:10
Am I wrong?
00:36:12
No, no, you're exactly right.
00:36:14
That actually thinking that wasn't the intended goal.
00:36:18
And you guys are pro golfers.
00:36:19
You don't accidentally hit a line drive across the water.
00:36:25
But do you look at his contacts here?
00:36:27
Hit the ball on the hole.
00:36:30
It's golf, not rocket science.
00:36:32
Another golfer, an.
00:36:33
Yeah, but you see fucking videos like this
00:36:34
all the time where they probably sat there for fucking ten days trying to do this
00:36:39
and then. Oh, you got a good shot of it. Is this competition?
00:36:41
Is this just. Yes. Assholes walking around?
00:36:44
This is competition.
00:36:47
The fact is, all on the whole is on my only.
00:36:50
So he's he's he's done this. He's experimented.
00:36:52
I'm sure you can tell by how forward his his his swing
00:36:55
is that he did it on purpose.
00:36:58
I don't think this would be an accident.
00:37:00
And it going in. I got it.
00:37:03
I wish I didn't exist because it's part of me doesn't
00:37:05
believe anything anymore, right?
00:37:07
My first second, it changes. It cuts shots.
00:37:10
I'm like, okay, it's a different shot.
00:37:12
But it didn't cut shot and they just cut you out.
00:37:16
I didn't see no, I didn't even know who was the real me.
00:37:18
Delivering the monologue today.
00:37:22
I'm sorry.
00:37:22
What?
00:37:24
Oh. I've got more, but, more money.
00:37:31
I would rather watch this.
00:37:33
This is my cooking with Cox.
00:37:35
Oh, that's not what I thought you meant.
00:37:37
I my wife says let's go. Is cut.
00:37:40
Spearhead. Nice cock. Brady.
00:37:42
Now you're saying cooking with Cox, which I didn't want to.
00:37:45
I don't if you're going to cook with Cox you go ahead and eat it.
00:37:49
I want to make more black tie.
00:37:53
We got white. Cox.
00:37:55
You're mac and cheese time.
00:37:56
I'll be white.
00:37:57
Black is wrong.
00:37:58
Your entire life. He's such a bully. That's not true.
00:38:01
You're just good. Not that good. This might be better.
00:38:03
Don't fuck it up.
00:38:04
I hate that big pot.
00:38:05
2 pounds of butter now melting.
00:38:07
No, now melt it.
00:38:09
Melt it out a boatload of this. A little at a time.
00:38:12
Obviously not all at a time.
00:38:13
So, yeah, until it looks like this.
00:38:15
I'm lactose intolerant and gluten free.
00:38:17
And this should be fine. Now we add salt.
00:38:18
Now we're going to grate the cheese or cheddar mozzarella.
00:38:21
And you just prove that they're reading cucumber.
00:38:22
I wouldn't do that. It becomes overwhelming.
00:38:24
Let's do what he says because he's the chef.
00:38:26
Now you're fucking cheese.
00:38:28
Boil some water salt it.
00:38:29
Like to see they say that because he have the taffy three minutes
00:38:33
left in the box as your pasta doesn't taste like oh no shit.
00:38:37
Tastes like undercooked.
00:38:38
Tastes like show me we're not gonna throw out.
00:38:41
Come on, man, this is supposed to be the clean our even do that for the salt.
00:38:46
Pepper. Right? Can you fucking do
00:38:49
that?
00:38:49
You pepper it.
00:38:50
Tell them what to do with them. That's right.
00:38:51
For the three episodes that we did that we got like nine foreign reviews.
00:38:54
Mac and cheese. You don't have to deal.
00:38:56
I turn this in before they'll be like, what are you
00:39:00
think I might add the fucking pasta water?
00:39:03
I can put any pepper you want to ask one more time.
00:39:05
So a little pepper, One layer of pasta.
00:39:08
We're going to add mozzarella. Another layer of pasta.
00:39:10
More authoritative.
00:39:11
No, no.
00:39:13
Thanks so much.
00:39:13
Macaroni and cheese. Thank you.
00:39:15
Give me the greens.
00:39:16
Now we're going to broil the top so it looks like leftovers from rooster.
00:39:21
Also these chives.
00:39:22
Let's see if it tastes no leftover from Good Friday.
00:39:24
Oh my god the Basham now.
00:39:26
Oh wow.
00:39:28
Very easy to do what I learned last week time
00:39:31
but worth as the red tones are still the best pizza around
00:39:35
and Brady's way smaller in real life in person.
00:39:39
Brady's like pretty.
00:39:41
I'm pretty sure it was your couch cushion, but that's okay
00:39:45
I couldn't it no, it made my my 40 pound dog
00:39:48
look like a grizzly bear.
00:39:53
Like I'm this big.
00:39:54
And then, like, I had a Brady right here next to me again.
00:39:58
You're so brave.
00:39:59
You cushions and gave me zero cushions.
00:40:02
I feel it was a setup.
00:40:04
It was a setup.
00:40:05
If you do, fast forward, I'm
00:40:06
sitting in your seat and I appear to be a regular size.
00:40:10
Oh, okay.
00:40:12
I'm not a medium. Damn it.
00:40:13
I like how you say appear to be.
00:40:16
I appear to be normal size.
00:40:18
That's the whole truth. Yeah.
00:40:21
Yeah.
00:40:21
Isn't it's an optical illusion.
00:40:24
That's nice. I'm 36.
00:40:26
I'm. I'm regular size.
00:40:27
You guys are giants.
00:40:28
I'm six foot.
00:40:29
I'm 185, one 200. On a bad day.
00:40:34
Gosh, I'm like, I know that's 15.
00:40:37
I'm the lard ass fucking normie over here.
00:40:41
Sorry.
00:40:43
I produced more of us.
00:40:44
And I'm only six for one. I'm not special.
00:40:47
It doesn't mean that's good or bad.
00:40:48
I'm just fat.
00:40:50
No, I'm just saying there's more normies.
00:40:51
My son. Actually, my son's, like six, four.
00:40:55
Okay.
00:40:55
Yeah, yeah, like I'm about your son and he's the big kid.
00:40:58
This is not a medical show.
00:40:59
We do not give doctors advice or medical advice in any way, shape or form.
00:41:02
But I recommend not starting to smoke cigarets when you're 12
00:41:07
oh oh. No,
00:41:09
that sounds good.
00:41:10
The next generation is like, what's a cigaret?
00:41:14
Oh, yeah, they're vaping.
00:41:18
Oh, friends of ours picked up
00:41:19
vaping in their, late 20s, early 30s. So
00:41:24
I didn't even know it was around now.
00:41:26
Oh, wait.
00:41:26
Their 20s or 30 now?
00:41:27
Dude, I was thinking, never mind right now, but
00:41:32
time. You know what? Time is a construct?
00:41:34
Time I'm going to prove later on in the show that time does not exist.
00:41:39
It is a thing later on in the show that time does not.
00:41:43
It does, didn't it?
00:41:45
That's it. Very clever.
00:41:47
Thank you.
00:41:48
How the doctor do
00:41:51
they always ask what I'm doing,
00:41:55
but never know how the doctor is?
00:42:00
What the dog doing?
00:42:02
But never.
00:42:06
The cats, How cruel they were to this dog.
00:42:10
That dog has the life of Riley.
00:42:12
This dog?
00:42:14
Yeah. It's like.
00:42:15
Oh, the look at the icicles on its chin. Beard.
00:42:16
Yeah.
00:42:17
Don't don't the paws stick like if you take your wet tongue
00:42:20
and put it on a metal pole, don't.
00:42:21
Dog's paws stick to the ground?
00:42:23
A tiny little patch of the cold is not,
00:42:26
you know, constant cold isn't the greatest, but huskies common.
00:42:29
If you've ever abused your dog,
00:42:32
I am, I'm abusing my dog right now.
00:42:35
That you not going to get in the barn
00:42:38
ready for your sleeve shirt last week?
00:42:42
It's, It's 150 question marks.
00:42:45
We did it, Ryan says.
00:42:47
And we're not talking about dogs or cats or even New York City rats.
00:42:52
And we're not talking about dog.
00:42:53
No, we are actually talking about dogs.
00:42:55
Yeah, we are talking about keep going. Don't want to do a clip.
00:42:57
That was it.
00:42:58
That was good. Okay.
00:42:59
So the moral of that story was even though everybody's always watching the dog,
00:43:05
sometimes you got to ask how the dog doing all the dog doing,
00:43:10
they're looking at all the characteristics of,
00:43:13
you know, treats
00:43:15
and their keeps.
00:43:18
It but babies.
00:43:21
So this this is kind of an old one, but I'm just going to bring it up anyway.
00:43:27
Oh, are you going to play the things that George skipped on me last week.
00:43:30
Is it. No. No wait.
00:43:31
No I'm sorry.
00:43:32
I should have labeled that with an R.
00:43:34
We can't we cannot.
00:43:35
Oh, well, that's okay.
00:43:36
I could do it. You.
00:43:39
You said something in the monologue about, some about the.
00:43:42
You said I lost you, so I just wasn't sure what you were talking about.
00:43:45
Where you were like, second is second, and third off is third off.
00:43:48
And what what are you.
00:43:49
Oh yeah.
00:43:50
Then I didn't even.
00:43:51
I'm just like your point, snips.
00:43:54
ZIP slop.
00:43:56
It's, Okay, so,
00:43:59
everyone's writing style has its own unique fingerprint.
00:44:03
If you've got a large enough sample size,
00:44:05
you can plug it into AI, and they can map it out for you,
00:44:09
like what words you're using the most, and next and next the next.
00:44:14
And someone else is writing style.
00:44:15
So you take the complete works of William Shakespeare, and then
00:44:19
and then you take a,
00:44:22
something that you don't know the authorship, but it's one of these two.
00:44:26
You plug that into the algorithm,
00:44:29
and if you analyze it, it's going to have it's going to match the,
00:44:33
the fingerprint of one or the other of the styles of writing.
00:44:38
But the words you use the most is use twice as much as the word you use.
00:44:43
Second, most, and the third is the third,
00:44:46
and the fourth is a fourth, and the fifth is a fifth, and it can get.
00:44:50
It staggers a little worse after that, but the first one,
00:44:54
the first five or so, are real clean breaks like that.
00:44:58
And that's as identifiable as a fingerprint.
00:45:02
Like
00:45:02
if you if you use a larger sample size and, definitely use the AI for the,
00:45:08
the analysis one, because,
00:45:11
I mean, it is kind of like
00:45:14
like somebody like, oh, we could do that.
00:45:16
We could do that with the show and figure out
00:45:19
how stupid we are.
00:45:22
Oh, we don't need to do anything to do to figure out where we I, we are, where?
00:45:26
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm pretty sure we we know.
00:45:29
But is it our fault because.
00:45:30
Fooled me, Jerry.
00:45:32
The English language most specifically
00:45:36
is fucked.
00:45:38
Me. No.
00:45:38
Yeah, yeah, it isn't bass,
00:45:42
bass lead, laugh.
00:45:46
Object.
00:45:47
Object.
00:45:48
Is this woman Devo
00:45:50
bow is French.
00:45:53
Now I've got.
00:45:54
And I've got a clip today.
00:45:56
That's all. French language hair.
00:45:59
Leave a life with that.
00:46:03
I figured out some culture, wind,
00:46:06
wind, line.
00:46:07
Minutes.
00:46:09
My newt, my newt.
00:46:11
Fledge, fledge.
00:46:13
Those are called,
00:46:15
homo graphs or comma graphs.
00:46:18
That's an on YouTube.
00:46:19
Yeah.
00:46:22
Yeah.
00:46:23
Homo means same graph.
00:46:25
Find more bird.
00:46:27
Homo means gay.
00:46:29
And and autocorrect gave me holograms.
00:46:35
And I didn't notice till I sent it.
00:46:37
So now it's in white holograms.
00:46:41
But it was supposed to say slang for female
00:46:43
genitalia.
00:46:47
While flange is a vaginal appearance, that's
00:46:49
significantly varies and which may appear loose or flappy
00:46:54
flappy.
00:46:55
But that's what fledged on the surface.
00:46:57
But you don't ever wind your watch or go check outside to see how windy it is.
00:47:02
You know what I mean? Like it?
00:47:04
So at some point you'll figure it out.
00:47:06
It's not that hard.
00:47:07
Yeah, you can understand in context these are things that we know
00:47:11
because we've been speaking English as a first language.
00:47:16
Oh, can we do a mount
00:47:18
Rushmore of, female?
00:47:22
The one thing was Mount Rushmore because they are not ranked one through four.
00:47:27
It is just, oh, there's all for the far left
00:47:31
for me is Christina Cook,
00:47:34
and there isn't anybody else on that list.
00:47:37
I would I know is route much more up there, man.
00:47:40
Route much more.
00:47:43
You can't
00:47:43
not put them on the Mount Rushmore just because of how influential they are.
00:47:47
Yeah, it's true.
00:47:53
That's a low,
00:47:55
Yeah. Never mind myself.
00:47:57
Never watch horses.
00:48:00
Please, please, please fix me.
00:48:04
Horse and death. Always. Please.
00:48:07
Yes, please. Here it is.
00:48:09
Hash.
00:48:09
And please, please, please tell us the.
00:48:17
This is one of the most famous problems in mathematics.
00:48:20
But it doesn't just haunt mathematicians because the implications
00:48:23
of the hypothesis, if they are ever proven, is it pronounced Riemann?
00:48:26
Reimann for trying to solve it in past years, it's turned out
00:48:30
that the Riemann hypothesis
00:48:31
might be related to black hole physics and ultimately quantum gravity.
00:48:34
The Riemann hypothesis has been open for more than 160 years, and if you
00:48:38
solve it, you can win $1 million prize, enough to buy a truly irresponsible amount
00:48:42
of the Riemann hypothesis.
00:48:44
Sounds like a hopelessly abstract problem that no one could possibly care about.
00:48:47
It's all about prime numbers.
00:48:49
If you look at the sequence of primes two, three,
00:48:51
five, seven, 11, 13, and so on, they look irregular.
00:48:54
There is no obvious pattern, but in the night time, very regular order.
00:48:57
Riemann discovered that the distribution of primes
00:48:59
is connected to a function called the zeta function,
00:49:01
which can either be written as a sum of all integers
00:49:03
or as a product over the primes.
00:49:05
So this function links all the integers.
00:49:07
The primes.
00:49:08
What makes them is that the function at all points
00:49:10
where the function becomes zero.
00:49:11
The exact
00:49:12
positions of these zeros determines the distribution of the prime numbers.
00:49:15
The Riemann hypothesis.
00:49:16
Not since not all of the important
00:49:17
zeros lie on a single vertical line in the complex plane.
00:49:20
If that's true, then
00:49:21
the primes are distributed as regularly as they possibly can.
00:49:24
I'll be right back. Gentlemen, I have to go find a new job.
00:49:26
Or prime numbers.
00:49:27
Yes, it's rather obscure. Mathematics.
00:49:29
But in the 1970s, physics entered the chat, and that changed the story.
00:49:32
Normal people think of what happens in nature
00:49:34
in terms of things that have positions and move around.
00:49:36
Physicists like to think of one. Well, that's true.
00:49:38
I did enter it because that works both for quantum and non quantum physics.
00:49:41
Think for example, of the electrons around atomic nuclei.
00:49:43
Speaking of that position makes no sense.
00:49:45
Speaking of their energy does make sense I believe this.
00:49:47
This chair is Gary,
00:49:49
whose energy levels look almost like it's the distributional thing.
00:49:53
Gary function so well, now we have quantum physics and chaos
00:49:56
and something sure looks like this combined almost ever since then.
00:50:01
Physicists I'm sorry I don't example. Well, they're just not guards.
00:50:03
Oh, sure.
00:50:04
Looks like Gargamel with his hair sticking out,
00:50:06
analyzing the quantum angle for physical stuff.
00:50:08
And who wouldn't like Gargamel?
00:50:10
There is a neutron star.
00:50:12
Yeah, that's, for example, this paper.
00:50:13
And this is where the new work comes in.
00:50:15
It's a continuation, if you haven't already. Please.
00:50:17
Like gravity.
00:50:18
Very unlike in general relativity, when
00:50:22
it helps with the
00:50:23
algorithm or algorithm that the authors looked at on rotational equations.
00:50:28
Simply, no. In an unexpected way, no.
00:50:31
If you had no,
00:50:34
I mean, sure, as a product of a prime numbers, physicists call this a prime.
00:50:39
He still calls and wants to know if we want to join the pairs in a black hole.
00:50:43
Not to be clear, this function that I get is similar to the Riemann zeta,
00:50:46
but not exactly the same.
00:50:47
And I think we should join with they they're willing to give it away
00:50:49
an asterisk, a realistic one.
00:50:51
So why am I telling you about this?
00:50:53
It's because this is an example of a trend that's been going on
00:50:55
in the foundations of physics for a decade or two,
00:50:57
since string theory peaked and entered its decline.
00:50:59
Physicists are looking for new mathematical links
00:51:01
that could help them combine gravity with quantum physics.
00:51:04
And one of the ways to do this is to stop talking about
00:51:06
what happens in space and time and say, oh man, that's
00:51:09
we are going to so much talk about space and time later.
00:51:12
Ask what happens to the energy of the sun.
00:51:14
This could work for the same reason I want to.
00:51:16
We might have to make it a whole.
00:51:17
The link between quantum is covered in quantum physics.
00:51:20
I give this paper a seven out of ten on the bullshit meter.
00:51:22
Why is it so high?
00:51:24
It's because I read people for their relevance in the field.
00:51:26
And what I think the
00:51:27
I don't think it is in this case, the physical relevance is extremely unclear.
00:51:31
It makes me somewhat
00:51:31
afraid that rather than progressing this foundations of physics,
00:51:33
we might see yet another wave of abstract math.
00:51:35
Subtle will eventually lead nowhere,
00:51:36
as long as it'll make the physicists money that we're going to see it.
00:51:39
Deep links between the Riemann hypothesis, chaos theory, black holes,
00:51:42
and some other also quasi crystals in there.
00:51:44
And I totally want to see more research on this.
00:51:46
Okay.
00:51:46
I really just want to see if it's to solve
00:51:48
the Riemann hypothesis before mathematicians get there.
00:51:50
I'm not the trusting kind.
00:51:51
I don't like cares who saw significant egotistical fly use not vpm, not physics.
00:51:57
Solve it. The mathematicians.
00:51:59
I'd rather just see it from browsing and comes with a threat protection
00:52:02
that keeps you safe from malware, trackers and malicious.
00:52:04
Why are we watching a commercial?
00:52:08
Because it allows you to pick your location.
00:52:10
That argument.
00:52:12
Look, I'm fucking sick of hearing.
00:52:14
Oh, and then she swore.
00:52:16
Oh, yeah, she did.
00:52:18
She did what a what a c u n t nice.
00:52:22
What a fledge.
00:52:24
Yeah. So sexy
00:52:27
it is.
00:52:27
Literally what I know that was literally your comment to this.
00:52:31
It dumbly repeats.
00:52:32
Okay, so an argument that I'm fucking sick of hearing is
00:52:37
you can hear her still talking in the background and so sexy I can too.
00:52:42
Yeah, strange.
00:52:45
It's like, oh, there's the boy, the search, the turn
00:52:47
by turn direction on the GPS.
00:52:49
Oh my God,
00:52:51
you like it?
00:52:53
Yeah.
00:52:53
If it dropped a couple F-bombs, you're in there. Turn. Fuck.
00:52:56
Fucking turn left.
00:52:57
Oh, that would be.
00:52:58
Yeah. Yeah, that would do it for me.
00:53:00
I would never get anywhere.
00:53:03
I would like it.
00:53:04
I respect it more.
00:53:05
I think it's more honest. Based on the Harvard
00:53:08
and Yale studies, people that swear are usually more truthful.
00:53:11
It seems like the turn by turn is like nagging me, like, turn right, turn right.
00:53:17
I know you have a square filter on, so I don't trust anything you're saying.
00:53:19
I assume you're lying about everything.
00:53:21
Well, so number 30, it's not a swear filter.
00:53:24
I just don't swear is a Backstreet Boy.
00:53:28
But I think we should wait for Rumble on that.
00:53:29
No, I don't smirked, smirked YouTube.
00:53:32
Yeah, I think bad things he does is just call the guy gay.
00:53:37
He doesn't call them the fag word
00:53:40
and they actually.
00:53:41
But they bleep it out.
00:53:43
Yeah, really.
00:53:44
It's a small bundle of sticks.
00:53:45
The argument is really the context there.
00:53:47
The bickering is funny and it's funny, but the actual argument
00:53:51
of the context of the conversation, because I'm curious on just what your guys
00:53:55
just we're already going to get blocked for showing the basketball game.
00:53:58
Wait, it's you know, it's right here in the small corner.
00:54:01
We've done this before.
00:54:02
When I'm in my hotels, I've had, someone in the background.
00:54:06
Oh, yeah.
00:54:07
That's true.
00:54:08
Oh, you get in trouble for wrestling footage?
00:54:11
I didn't see any wrestling footage this week.
00:54:14
Yeah, but if wrestling footage was this big in the corner, trust me,
00:54:17
the guy fucking your media guy does it.
00:54:20
So this isn't a video of you?
00:54:23
It does have a video right there.
00:54:25
Well, below the.
00:54:27
The head of it is. That's above as above.
00:54:30
So the video,
00:54:32
will you tell me when I find the video?
00:54:34
Because it may be gone.
00:54:36
Fuck it.
00:54:36
I just want to see what happens if you pull it up.
00:54:38
Maybe
00:54:40
I have a very aggressive ad blocker.
00:54:44
So if it's from somewhere else, it might be.
00:54:46
Let me. I don't want to just turn it off.
00:54:49
Now the very first thing is the video bro.
00:54:51
Yeah. It's blocked. It's not.
00:54:53
But between
00:54:54
the big the bold writing underneath, are you able to play it?
00:54:57
Because that would be the fastest solution otherwise. Why?
00:55:00
Brian Little yeah, I'm waiting for a fucking ad to buffer
00:55:05
a second.
00:55:05
That's a shame.
00:55:07
I know page six is still in a video.
00:55:10
That's what's happening.
00:55:12
It's a dark
00:55:14
and a while.
00:55:15
We're waiting.
00:55:17
We're.
00:55:19
We're going to be
00:55:21
goddamn. Goddammit.
00:55:21
I go watch this whole fucking ad.
00:55:23
The other one I could skip. Continue.
00:55:26
Oh, yeah.
00:55:27
It's it's very hard to see, but
00:55:29
bam, bam, there's our graveyard raccoon from last week.
00:55:33
Or it's this thing right here.
00:55:35
No kidding.
00:55:36
What is it?
00:55:38
It's our graveyard. Raccoon.
00:55:39
Graveyard raccoon ghost.
00:55:42
Raccoon.
00:55:43
Oh. I didn't touch ready at a wildlife
00:55:46
encounter here at the the farm.
00:55:49
But he was quite startled to see me, and he just staring at me.
00:55:52
He's just staring at me. I live on a farm.
00:55:54
Yeah. Could have. Probably has rabies.
00:55:56
Yeah.
00:55:57
There is a there is, positive case of rabies around here.
00:56:00
I just saw the news.
00:56:01
I don't remember where, so just be careful everywhere.
00:56:05
The dog is hogging the heated blanket.
00:56:09
That's smart. That's a good dog.
00:56:11
How the dog doing? The dog's warm.
00:56:13
Yeah. He's. Yeah, he's doing fine.
00:56:16
Yeah.
00:56:17
So the video we will eventually see is Backstreet Boys.
00:56:19
Brian Littrell uses homophobic slurs in new video
00:56:24
filed in a in court as part of a trespassing dispute,
00:56:27
Brian Littrell called his neighbor gay and a it's, Yeah.
00:56:32
So what?
00:56:33
The lyric is here during a heated beach trespass.
00:56:38
You'll get the idea. This month.
00:56:40
Yeah, so you get the idea.
00:56:41
But the whole incident was came in here.
00:56:45
And what the guy references is he references wet sand.
00:56:48
So if you own beachfront property, like you don't own the water, right?
00:56:52
So you could actually walk in the water
00:56:55
in front of their property and they can't do much about you.
00:56:57
So that's kind of what this guy's
00:57:00
defense is.
00:57:02
But oh. Just wet sand. Okay.
00:57:05
I'm just curious as to what you guys think is right.
00:57:07
Who's wrong as a, you're wrong context of the situation.
00:57:12
And then they're both kind of tool bags.
00:57:15
So that's just equal.
00:57:17
So hold on.
00:57:17
A tool bag is a very useful tool itself.
00:57:20
So I discount your friend.
00:57:22
Yeah.
00:57:22
So he's like there even marked it off like he drew a circle around
00:57:26
like where the sand is. What.
00:57:29
And he even just got closer to the water.
00:57:31
So his feet are like touching the wet sand.
00:57:37
But wait.
00:57:38
So he's allowed to touch wet sand that's considered strongly on private property.
00:57:42
If he's like that, says private property beach.
00:57:48
Sorry.
00:57:48
Not because I think you just. You
00:57:52
know.
00:57:53
Hey, is there sound?
00:57:54
I'm on wet sand right now. Not in your face.
00:57:57
My point of view.
00:57:58
I didn't know you put it in my face. I'm nowhere bro.
00:58:00
Yeah, look at this.
00:58:02
Look at this.
00:58:03
Yeah, you've done it. The bridge. He's out.
00:58:04
You, bro.
00:58:05
Seriously?
00:58:06
You're never going to talk about the S-Word.
00:58:08
But I feel like that.
00:58:09
I trust you. No, you will not. You're going.
00:58:12
Next one's going to get thrown out. Thank you.
00:58:14
Your next case, your first one got thrown out.
00:58:16
And this is what I deal with.
00:58:17
This is what I do with people like this. Seriously.
00:58:20
Just like this, you can't even shove your phone in my face, bro.
00:58:23
You're lucky you got enough to go.
00:58:25
Yes you did. You reach around me from behind my back.
00:58:27
Dude, I got you on video.
00:58:28
Oh, if you're watching, be great.
00:58:30
If you give a, like, comment and subscribe, it really bury my face.
00:58:36
Oh, no. I want to be.
00:58:37
You really watch every week and you want to contribute.
00:58:39
You can hit that little subscribe button and
00:58:43
yes, the gift
00:58:44
of money with a little dollars in cash so we can afford to pay for Gary's.
00:58:48
My money. Look at this wet sand. Great.
00:58:49
Oh, well, he just said he reached around the market.
00:58:54
Watch this.
00:58:57
Like he did.
00:58:59
It almost looks like he.
00:59:00
Because the sand around that he went to the left.
00:59:01
Right doesn't look as well as that sand.
00:59:03
It's almost like
00:59:03
he scooped a bunch of water and like, hey, let's hope this is what I do it up more.
00:59:07
So he could go, no, no, no, I've done this before haven't you.
00:59:12
Don't you don't have enough money to buy from a public property.
00:59:15
Looks public access.
00:59:17
He bought a public financing public? No.
00:59:19
We all been here for 20 years. You've been here three.
00:59:21
You're done for it. You're done for, bro.
00:59:23
You're done for. You're not going to get property.
00:59:25
You'll never get privacy. I can't wait till this.
00:59:27
You'll never get privacy here. Good, bro. Good luck.
00:59:31
So. Who's right?
00:59:34
Page six. I don't even get it.
00:59:37
It's something.
00:59:38
It's news that nobody gives a book about.
00:59:41
Back when pages mattered.
00:59:43
Yeah, nobody cared about. What are you guys?
00:59:44
Who do you guys think is in the right?
00:59:46
And who's the who's in the wrong?
00:59:48
Can you pick these douchebags?
00:59:51
I mean, two bags legally.
00:59:54
Who's right and who's wrong?
00:59:56
What state?
00:59:57
Where was it?
00:59:59
Obviously California or Florida.
01:00:01
But regardless, usually the situation. Yeah, it matters.
01:00:03
Florida is not any of the beach itself is even allowed to be private.
01:00:08
There's this spot by turn around that, I go with my jet ski
01:00:12
and it's right by this private country club, whatever the fuck it is,
01:00:16
I don't know, conservation. Something and
01:00:20
not always
01:00:21
like the beach that's in front of their shit.
01:00:24
And I've always just kind of pitstop there.
01:00:28
And they have, like, security people that come around
01:00:30
and if you like, walk up the sand, they like yell at you
01:00:32
and they always eyeball the fuck out of me.
01:00:34
But like, I usually just stay with my jet ski
01:00:36
half beach and I just kind of hang out half in the water.
01:00:40
They can't prevent me from, like, pit stopping.
01:00:42
They don't own the water, you know, it is kind of like my refuge point.
01:00:48
If I need help or I need to take a break, like I.
01:00:51
So. But that guy, the douchebag squatter guy, was like,
01:00:56
he already knew what he was doing, though, you know, he's like, oh, I can get like.
01:01:00
Because if you look down the bay with no reason why he couldn't have been 50ft,
01:01:05
like there was nobody there.
01:01:06
Yeah, there's anyone from can't can't they I mean, like in kindergarten,
01:01:10
you know, I think he's just trolling the motherfucker.
01:01:12
Maybe they could just. Right.
01:01:13
You think he knew it was the famous people to you?
01:01:16
So, yeah, I think he's fucking with probably.
01:01:18
Yeah.
01:01:18
Maybe he's trying to get, him to attack him or fight him or something.
01:01:23
Is it okay?
01:01:24
I've been to, public access beach in case hate hate hate hate hate hate hate.
01:01:30
And, you go down the public access trail,
01:01:34
and if you turn right, you're all good, but you're not allowed to go left.
01:01:39
That's private.
01:01:40
Was that.
01:01:41
I went to a place called Queer Hollow.
01:01:44
I did go to Clear Hollow as a kid, you know, that's going up the the left.
01:01:49
That wasn't the quarry, was it?
01:01:52
Right.
01:01:53
And I the pool exists where the.
01:01:58
The high tide line is high tide. Oh.
01:02:05
Low key that.
01:02:06
Sorry.
01:02:07
So that's a very, very, very obscure,
01:02:10
very obscure Seinfeld.
01:02:12
Oh. High tide.
01:02:14
Anyways. That's okay.
01:02:17
Okay. But I've got some.
01:02:19
I got some very obscure,
01:02:22
home improvement.
01:02:24
Dude, you know, you mentioned you mentioned Binford.
01:02:26
Did you not mention Binford?
01:02:28
I did, I did it was,
01:02:30
the, the the the Benford's law.
01:02:34
About four and a half months. Tim.
01:02:37
But, that's only because I'm doing it the old fashioned way.
01:02:41
Sort of.
01:02:41
My brow and an ax hocks on your ax. Al.
01:02:47
This is what you need, buddy.
01:02:49
And the.
01:02:53
You know, the Beverly 80, 282 cc,
01:02:56
42 inch crowbar, silicone, piston steel
01:02:58
bucking. Oh.
01:03:02
Oh. That's fine.
01:03:07
What was about Binford?
01:03:09
Binford?
01:03:10
What was that?
01:03:10
Benford's law?
01:03:13
It's.
01:03:14
It's the weird way numbers.
01:03:17
Like, if you if you have a,
01:03:19
inventory, you count up all the
01:03:22
this of that and that over there
01:03:24
and all those over there and the other thing, you get this.
01:03:28
Oh, a bunch of numbers,
01:03:33
most of them an inordinate amount of them.
01:03:36
We'll start with the number one.
01:03:40
That that makes sense,
01:03:43
because you get to the ones before you get to any of the other numbers.
01:03:47
But if your aggregate
01:03:50
has a lot of numbers, shouldn't have,
01:03:54
you know, eights and sevens and it does, but you got it.
01:03:59
According to Benford's law, you get more power
01:04:03
30% once you get 30% more power.
01:04:07
Herb. Yes,
01:04:10
it's Benford's lie.
01:04:13
Wrong button.
01:04:15
Dude, did you see this chem trail on the other day?
01:04:17
Oh my God, we're all going to die.
01:04:22
This is the chem trail.
01:04:25
Some reason.
01:04:27
So I first of all,
01:04:29
I see, I see a word on the smoke on the ground.
01:04:33
Is anybody else? See? I don't know what it says.
01:04:35
Looks like it says pet love
01:04:38
above Pabst Blue Ribbon.
01:04:40
They have advertising in the actual smoke on the ground.
01:04:45
That's amazing. They don't
01:04:47
really.
01:04:47
Yeah.
01:04:48
So yeah, I want to believe the space law
01:04:51
and sponsored by Pabst.
01:04:54
That's Sky writer on their way up there.
01:04:56
Can't make that one any bigger.
01:04:59
You'll see it when you watch back.
01:05:00
You'll see it says pet. Pet.
01:05:01
Something can be pressed on,
01:05:05
you know, I watch it back on the same size phone.
01:05:08
The same exact phone.
01:05:09
I watch it back in a different size.
01:05:12
They're not going to, I'm not going to even argue this one.
01:05:15
There's definitely chemicals in that country.
01:05:17
I think they're right, I love it.
01:05:19
There's a couple idiots in the car.
01:05:20
Like they were like,
01:05:21
I can't believe they they let a plane fly this close to a rocket ship going off.
01:05:26
And it's like fucking far away. That is.
01:05:29
How far away?
01:05:30
How far away is it?
01:05:33
I don't know, but it's nowhere close.
01:05:36
He's.
01:05:36
It's way too young to get that reference.
01:05:38
Why, it's so far
01:05:41
that you would have to go back in time to see it.
01:05:44
Thanks.
01:05:45
Gene.
01:05:45
Rayburn.
01:05:49
Here's another one.
01:05:50
Do I have an envelope?
01:05:51
Should I do
01:05:53
envelope? Envelope?
01:05:55
Envelope envelope.
01:05:57
Oh. 17 items.
01:06:01
Two and drawers.
01:06:02
Penis.
01:06:10
Three things that are completely overblown.
01:06:13
Oh, no.
01:06:16
Fuck off. That actually worked out well.
01:06:18
So you're mad because your penis is overblown, but your fucking business.
01:06:23
That is correct.
01:06:25
I want to know what the Clint Eastwood our life.
01:06:28
We're going to have to go to Rumble to see that I have two more.
01:06:32
Two more for me.
01:06:33
I thought it wouldn't play.
01:06:36
No, I won't, that's why I have to see it.
01:06:38
I don't know what it was.
01:06:38
You're going to have to act it out or something.
01:06:41
Oh, it's from a movie acted out.
01:06:44
What's this one? Not possible to the guy with the no fingers.
01:06:46
Won't play either. Act that one out.
01:06:49
Oh, yeah.
01:06:50
You got some.
01:06:51
I've got.
01:06:51
I've got an angle grinder here, but it's so much better if he does it
01:06:55
because he's got the whole Elmo damn thing going on.
01:07:03
What's it sound?
01:07:06
Oh, I want to hear it. 16.
01:07:08
1514 1312 oh 13.1.
01:07:12
They're going to try it has been told by the Court of Appeal
01:07:15
that it is not possible to determine which one of them is the father,
01:07:19
with the woman saying she will try to go to trial with the twins now.
01:07:23
So are they both using the lead and the other doesn't feel left down?
01:07:27
The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, has confirmed she will continue
01:07:31
to take both of the identical twins until they can find a new type
01:07:35
of DNA testing that reveals which one the father is or she's able to.
01:07:40
To be clear and recap, this woman had sex with twins four days apart.
01:07:46
She got pregnant.
01:07:47
DNA cannot determine which twin is this matter.
01:07:51
Does it matter?
01:07:52
She loves them both. It does not matter to her.
01:07:54
She says we will have another child to assign to the other twin.
01:07:59
But it doesn't mean she's going to want to have sex with them
01:08:01
both, to conceive a second child with them so that they both have, what each other.
01:08:05
One, the mother and one of the twins had taken the case to court after
01:08:08
the other twin was named on the birth certificate as the father,
01:08:11
but they demanded that this wasn't fair, with the woman claiming this rock, paper,
01:08:15
scissors named on the birth certificate was better in bed and therefore,
01:08:18
hey, you know what should be listed as you'll be able to tell when are you?
01:08:21
What do you think of that? It looks more like oh no, no.
01:08:24
What do you think of that? Who?
01:08:25
Whoever she liked better in bed gets the gets. He's the winner,
01:08:29
right?
01:08:29
Wait till the kid grows up and whoever he looks more like is the father.
01:08:33
Obviously. Yeah, that's a good idea.
01:08:34
Put him in the center of the room
01:08:35
and have each father sitting in one corner and have down.
01:08:39
Yeah, that was a child. Come out.
01:08:41
Come here, boy.
01:08:42
Come here, boy, you can do.
01:08:43
Yeah, yeah, that's the only way to do it.
01:08:46
They tried that, but every time they tried doing it,
01:08:48
the three of them were fucking again.
01:08:50
Father of the child.
01:08:51
No fucking weird.
01:08:53
Like attached to each other.
01:08:55
Anyway, they follow each other throughout life and it's fucking weird.
01:08:58
So they'll they'll be hanging on all the time anyway, like, right.
01:09:01
Just both both raise it.
01:09:03
I have a two up, two dads, a mole on my neck.
01:09:07
I one right away. I said, fuck that.
01:09:08
We're not we're not competing for anything, sir.
01:09:10
You sit down on the verdict. Told them.
01:09:13
Yeah, this is a right clusterfuck.
01:09:15
I don't really understand.
01:09:16
Come on, everyone, we're trying to do the right thing.
01:09:20
There's no shit with either twin.
01:09:22
All their relationships with each other.
01:09:23
It's just.
01:09:24
Oh, well, wait a minute.
01:09:25
There's a relationship with each other
01:09:28
now? Yeah, if you ask me, I.
01:09:29
Not everybody has a relationship with everybody.
01:09:31
I assumed it was a sexual relationship.
01:09:34
You did take this abomination.
01:09:35
How hard could this be to not do. Really?
01:09:38
How hard could this be? He's full of puns.
01:09:40
In fact, most everyone.
01:09:42
If the person you're dating
01:09:43
is an identical twin, then sleeping with them both is not a win.
01:09:46
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go
01:09:48
stop my client from making another mistake.
01:09:53
Jesus was risen yesterday.
01:09:58
Was he like.
01:10:00
That was a long time ago.
01:10:03
Sorry.
01:10:03
We we celebrated yesterday.
01:10:07
While we celebrated any time, because there is no time.
01:10:11
So do we want to be religious at all?
01:10:13
But at the.
01:10:14
I went to some place that I don't normally celebrate Easter with,
01:10:19
whatever the.
01:10:19
But there was somebody from church who like it was like, look, no,
01:10:22
but they like made that made this kid like like they like ask them.
01:10:27
I made a kid why we celebrate Easter.
01:10:29
It kind of like made the kid, like, tell us about Jesus.
01:10:32
And I just thought it was kind of odd and awkward, even though, like,
01:10:35
if that's what you want to believe, that's all fine and dandy.
01:10:37
If that kid goes to church with his bitch, goes to church.
01:10:39
That's funny.
01:10:40
But they, like, force the kid to like, do this performance.
01:10:44
I don't know, let's say it like a Taco Bell.
01:10:46
It was completely inappropriate.
01:10:48
No, it just, you know, say a prayer.
01:10:50
That's fine, I don't care. That's good.
01:10:52
But when you're, like, forcing the kid to, like,
01:10:54
do a religious dance just for the sake of, like, I don't know,
01:11:00
it's just weird to me.
01:11:01
My aunt is an atheist, and we started talking over Easter
01:11:06
because when I, I said, Happy Easter.
01:11:08
And she said, why are you saying that?
01:11:10
And I said, because today's Easter.
01:11:12
I didn't say, the Lord is our Savior and all the right hand
01:11:15
stuff and risen and stuff.
01:11:16
I just happy Easter, she said, well, it made me uncomfortable.
01:11:18
And then
01:11:20
my wife at dinner was like, we're going to say grace.
01:11:24
And we don't usually say grace.
01:11:26
But I think she did it as a point.
01:11:28
Like, we're kind of stubborn that way, you know? Yeah.
01:11:31
And then it opened up a huge dialog about you.
01:11:34
Then what is it?
01:11:35
If somebody says Merry Christmas to you or a Happy Easter and you're an atheist?
01:11:39
I'm not sure who I'm directing this at does that.
01:11:42
If I had a Happy Easter, does that affect me in any way?
01:11:45
She was offended. Grace.
01:11:47
People said it outside of our event
01:11:51
and she said it just made her very uncomfortable.
01:11:53
It was very weird. They should have known, she said.
01:11:57
You will say Grace Carey?
01:11:59
Yeah, you'll get into the Lord and you just go, hey,
01:12:02
you just kind of do a generality and then like at the end,
01:12:06
we bow our heads to pray.
01:12:09
Amen.
01:12:10
Every child be fed today.
01:12:11
There's a there. Oh, Lord, there you go.
01:12:13
We praise you.
01:12:15
What's wrong with that one?
01:12:16
God bless our heads and pray that every child on earth be fed today.
01:12:19
Amen, Amen, Amen.
01:12:21
She literally mumbled through that like we said it as quick as possible.
01:12:25
Just, you know, I don't know.
01:12:26
My wife has a thing, I guess. I don't know,
01:12:30
I'm sure.
01:12:30
Yeah, she's a woman.
01:12:31
That's not what I meant. She had my thing.
01:12:34
Let's make my life.
01:12:36
Let's make some.
01:12:37
Let's make fun of somebody else before we go over to Rumble.
01:12:41
Okay, here comes the blitz.
01:12:43
And here's Brady.
01:12:48
So this is for our audio viewers.
01:12:49
He's googling, is there wind on the moon?
01:12:52
Yours.
01:12:53
So listen we're going to knock.
01:12:54
These are audio.
01:12:56
If you know
01:12:58
our audio listeners.
01:13:04
Our visual listener partner,
01:13:08
so his all right, we're there's about six of these.
01:13:11
We're just gonna knock them out in my life where we go over to Rumble.
01:13:14
And so he says, there's no atmosphere.
01:13:16
There's no wind. What?
01:13:17
Everybody agree with that?
01:13:19
On the moon? No wind.
01:13:21
Okay, well, he shows he shows
01:13:23
the famous picture of the American flag.
01:13:27
That's gosh, he didn't show up for a while, but everybody
01:13:31
yeah, everybody that has watched MTV knows there's a wire holding it up.
01:13:35
And if you move something in space, it will swing a little.
01:13:37
It was not blowing in the breeze.
01:13:39
It was hanging on a wire. Right.
01:13:42
Okay, so that's
01:13:43
one of our stars visible from
01:13:47
the moon.
01:13:48
That answer I honestly don't know.
01:13:50
I've never been to the moon.
01:13:51
But I would I would have said that there was some weird effect with taking.
01:13:56
Just like on Earth.
01:13:57
Yeah, the camera. Camera will let any of them.
01:13:59
It'll just be black sky,
01:14:02
right?
01:14:03
But we should we should try to,
01:14:05
because it is a talk show.
01:14:06
We should be on that space.
01:14:07
We should try to go over the actual concept
01:14:09
first of why they think it is, and then we'll debunk it.
01:14:12
That might be more
01:14:13
than just no, no, let's just destroy.
01:14:15
Knock knock. Who's there? Gary. Because it's stupid.
01:14:17
Yes it's stupid I agree there.
01:14:20
Yeah. So it's the camera.
01:14:21
What? We just skipped that one already because we already said it.
01:14:23
The camera resolution. Right. It. Yeah.
01:14:25
Certainly cannot pick up
01:14:27
the stars.
01:14:30
Yeah, this is what we're looking at.
01:14:34
This one I don't.
01:14:35
This one I did not look up at all.
01:14:36
I could debunk all of them except this one.
01:14:40
Okay.
01:14:41
Moon versus Earth jump right.
01:14:46
Earth looks like.
01:14:48
What is that point? Six meters. Five.
01:14:49
Five times.
01:14:51
Is it five times?
01:14:54
But. Oh, you know what I did?
01:14:55
Look this up, I remember.
01:14:56
So here's the moon.
01:14:57
They show somebody in the same space suit jumping 2.7m.
01:15:03
But from my understanding,
01:15:05
it's not really seven meters.
01:15:07
That is a huge jump for my understanding though.
01:15:10
The the boots were weighted so they didn't fly off into space,
01:15:15
and it would lead me to believe that a human being has
01:15:17
a, you know, when the step is like one millimeter off, he trip on it.
01:15:20
So the human brain is conditioned for Earth, you know.
01:15:24
Oh yeah.
01:15:25
So they would probably make the weights on the, in the boots around their sack
01:15:29
they had on their backpack or whatever
01:15:31
equal or as close to as they could the earth.
01:15:33
So people knew how to walk. Right.
01:15:35
So that one's busted.
01:15:37
They kind of look clumsy.
01:15:40
Yeah.
01:15:40
And he's he's literally claiming that this jump is the this size jump. He.
01:15:47
Ain't happy.
01:15:50
Yes. Our imperial look up 8.5ft.
01:15:52
But with the with the weights in the boot, there's no way.
01:15:58
Okay, so this one
01:15:59
blew my mind when I first I literally this one threw me.
01:16:03
It says something about them.
01:16:04
First man to step on the moon.
01:16:08
Neil Armstrong.
01:16:10
Yeah.
01:16:14
Oh, I know the question.
01:16:15
It's a selfie stick.
01:16:17
No, no.
01:16:19
Oh, they show his boot.
01:16:21
There's this.
01:16:22
There's his boot. Can you see his boot here? I've seen that.
01:16:24
That's at the museum.
01:16:25
That's at the Neil Armstrong Museum in Ohio.
01:16:27
I've been there.
01:16:28
That's supposedly this.
01:16:29
This is a spacesuit that wasn't the one.
01:16:31
The one that's in that museum is actually tackling that.
01:16:34
The one that actually he wore supposedly.
01:16:36
Right.
01:16:37
But it was it might not be the exact one, but it's the same exact style.
01:16:40
It's he it's one he wore.
01:16:41
But it's not one. One you one.
01:16:44
Right.
01:16:44
So here's the first boot print on the moon.
01:16:46
And I literally was like 000 no.
01:16:49
Because at first I saw it in the,
01:16:50
in the thing and I'm like, oh my God, that's cool.
01:16:52
And then I'm like, wait, this never went to fucking them like, this is stupid.
01:16:55
But it did, it did it did.
01:16:57
That boot was on it.
01:16:58
But they had two suits for protection in case one tour.
01:17:00
And this one, this one had the outer galoshes.
01:17:03
Gosh.
01:17:04
Galatians galoshes.
01:17:06
How do you say that? Rubber?
01:17:08
Galatians.
01:17:09
No, that's a book about it. Philippians.
01:17:12
Is it
01:17:12
Galatians is really cool
01:17:14
because they do have like some pretty
01:17:16
historical stuff in there, but it is very small
01:17:18
and you get through it in like ten minutes.
01:17:19
It's yeah, it's not worth the drive.
01:17:22
Tourist trap
01:17:23
unless you do something else,
01:17:25
which there's nothing else to do in the Lima, Ohio area.
01:17:27
Gary would know so very easily debunked.
01:17:30
That's the outer of I grew up in Ohio.
01:17:32
Their booty, other booty.
01:17:35
But they're like, oh my God, it's totally different.
01:17:37
It is. It's totally different.
01:17:38
What looks like a bowling shoe and one looks like a fucking moon boot.
01:17:43
Wait, is that why they name those kind of style a boots, moon boots?
01:17:46
Moon?
01:17:47
Yeah.
01:17:51
What was that question?
01:17:53
So I apologize.
01:17:55
I've always had this question.
01:17:56
The who's filming because there they got different angles.
01:17:59
Neil Armstrong, moon landing video.
01:18:03
Oh okay. Man that's that's my selfie stick.
01:18:05
Did they just film it down a tripod?
01:18:07
And then it was on a boom.
01:18:10
What kind of.
01:18:11
That's a long ass boom.
01:18:12
What the fuck are you talking.
01:18:13
Yeah.
01:18:16
No. The camera, the two,
01:18:19
they moved into position before they got out of the the lander.
01:18:23
So I'm gonna put it in a position and then got out of the lander.
01:18:28
Yeah. No,
01:18:29
it's not moving with the lander.
01:18:31
They found they shot a perfect camera that was pointing right in the.
01:18:36
They had some.
01:18:36
We're going to other technology back then.
01:18:38
We're just figuring out how to go around the moon ones right now.
01:18:40
Yeah. Yeah.
01:18:42
Sling shot.
01:18:43
So we're going to look at this later on Rumble.
01:18:45
But this this one if you know how it happened or why we can see the footage.
01:18:49
And if you say selfie stick again say it.
01:18:52
Say what again.
01:18:54
Selfies didn't.
01:18:57
I don't know why these incredible
01:18:59
before that Artemus, did you guys see up to the Artemus launch
01:19:02
how they were, like troubleshooting some shit?
01:19:04
Like, I don't know,
01:19:06
20 minutes before they fucking launched it?
01:19:09
And it's like, what are you guys been doing the entire time?
01:19:11
Like, why you just finish this product and you just got done troubleshooting it,
01:19:15
and then we're like, all right, we're good.
01:19:17
Why wasn't this done like months ago? What
01:19:20
seems weird?
01:19:22
Check it every day.
01:19:25
Yeah.
01:19:25
They had a lot of work to do while they were in space too.
01:19:28
Like, why don't you do prep that before now?
01:19:31
They keep harping on the idea of like, oh, this is going to get us,
01:19:34
you know, we're going to practice getting there more because we're going
01:19:38
to start a civilization there and have a base there.
01:19:41
It makes sense.
01:19:42
If you have the IRS, you could have just a thing on the moon.
01:19:45
The main thing would be creating a jump off point,
01:19:47
because it would be cheaper to go to the moon like it's a layover,
01:19:51
you know, on your way to Mars or some shit.
01:19:53
You know? Yeah, stop at the moon.
01:19:55
Yeah. Good. Jump off point.
01:19:56
As far as, like, there being anything on the moon to do or
01:20:00
would be viable, like Jack's mom's house, other than experiments and shit,
01:20:06
we follow the show.
01:20:07
So when they talk about Moon base and shit
01:20:09
like that, it's like it's not what you know.
01:20:11
There's not going to be a whole.
01:20:12
But there will, because once you're once you're that far out of the atmosphere,
01:20:16
launching from the lunar, launching from the moon
01:20:19
will be so much easier than launching from the Earth.
01:20:21
Yeah, but that's that's also what a good horror movie is made out of.
01:20:25
We're not going to make a base on the moon.
01:20:26
We're going to make a base all the way around the atmosphere.
01:20:29
Elon Musk has this plan to put in 1 million
01:20:32
new satellites, all with server capabilities for I.
01:20:35
The ones that I were talking about that are going to the cooling is going to face
01:20:38
deep space and the heating and power is going to face the sun.
01:20:41
Get the power directly from the sun.
01:20:43
It's brilliant. He's going to do it.
01:20:46
Once we do
01:20:46
that, there won't be any need to go any farther.
01:20:50
This one through me to the actual shape of the earth
01:20:54
is an oblique oblate spheroid.
01:20:58
They showed it so quick, you fuckers!
01:21:01
Why wouldn't it be a totally different video?
01:21:04
Fucking meatball.
01:21:06
You know.
01:21:07
Well, because of it's an optical illusion.
01:21:09
Why, when you look out of the horizon, does it have a curve, even though you know
01:21:13
you're not clearly away it far, far enough to see the curve of the Earth?
01:21:17
That's an optical illusion.
01:21:20
Light actually bends before it hits your eye,
01:21:24
and your eye also make up.
01:21:25
It'll fill in the blanks if you know if you
01:21:28
it'll make things smooth that aren't smooth.
01:21:31
I'm going to try and pause it this time. There.
01:21:34
I've never
01:21:34
heard that the earth is this shape to that extreme.
01:21:37
Oh no blades here would in the middle.
01:21:40
It's actually pear shaped.
01:21:42
It's fatter at the bottom to.
01:21:44
Can you see though, what it looks like on the screen here.
01:21:47
Yeah it is because like the oddball flats that it's got are,
01:21:50
well, to be clear and with a grain of salt,
01:21:52
this is the same guy that we just debunked.
01:21:55
The other five things he said pretty quickly.
01:21:56
So it's probably not right.
01:21:59
It while it's on this with everybody, see the people freaking out
01:22:02
because Australia is too large.
01:22:03
So clearly they didn't land on the moon
01:22:07
did anybody?
01:22:07
Australia is really large but well, that that is true.
01:22:11
But so they showed pictures from the old
01:22:15
guard or whatever the old moon forest
01:22:19
and Australia looks smaller.
01:22:21
These people. Just to cut to the chase.
01:22:23
Knock, knock. Who's there? Gary.
01:22:25
The earth was upside down and they were looking at the top of Africa
01:22:30
and thought that that they thought that that was Australia.
01:22:35
Oh, that's very stupid.
01:22:37
Yeah, it's as stupid as as you're arguing and debating and trying to show everyone
01:22:42
how smart you are in the room and you say, what's animosity?
01:22:48
That happened over the weekend.
01:22:50
Yeah, that happened to me over the weekend.
01:22:51
I was a spectator.
01:22:53
Two very smart people arguing
01:22:56
and person said, well, what if somebody holds animosity to you?
01:23:00
And he's like, what's that? And he started explaining more and it was like a skit.
01:23:02
He's like, no, I mean, what's animosity?
01:23:06
I think
01:23:07
at that moment, yeah, yeah,
01:23:12
I wish I could remember your vocabulary comes up a little short.
01:23:15
I decided to stop being condescending.
01:23:18
Condescending means talking down to people.
01:23:23
Thanks.
01:23:24
You sure you don't mean chem descending?
01:23:29
That's like a chemical joke if you really go to it.
01:23:32
Okay. Good job into it.
01:23:35
It's also a.
01:23:36
So I thought it was seaweed.
01:23:38
That's what I was hoping. It wasn't.
01:23:41
We didn't finish it.
01:23:44
Oh, I finished all right. I.
01:23:51
We've had full disclosure on the particulates
01:23:54
being thrown into the atmosphere and contrails and people who claim
01:23:59
there are chem trails are still treated like their foil. And.
01:24:04
No, no, no no no. Hold on.
01:24:06
Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah.
01:24:08
People that think every contrail is a chem trail as foil headers.
01:24:12
I agree there are, there is the technology of chem trail.
01:24:15
I've seen it in simple crop dusting.
01:24:17
So yeah that technology. Oh yeah. Yeah.
01:24:19
They've even what do you know anything about it.
01:24:22
You used the word particulate.
01:24:24
Yeah.
01:24:25
Or do you know how many particulates are in our atmosphere
01:24:28
and how many chem trails it would take to actually make
01:24:30
any damn bit of even significant difference?
01:24:33
No, I don't either.
01:24:35
But I bet it's a lot. Yeah, I bet you.
01:24:39
Yeah.
01:24:39
Batch cutting, putting a drop of green dye in the ocean and going,
01:24:42
look, I'm trying to turn the ocean green.
01:24:49
And it was a lot of quiet.
01:24:52
Oh, yeah.
01:24:52
That makes for a bad show.
01:24:54
All right. We should go to Rumble.
01:24:56
Yeah.
01:24:56
To that.
01:25:03
The unfiltered
01:25:05
and crude proclamation of unrestrained speech.
01:25:09
All right, folks, listen up before
01:25:12
we dive headfirst into that circus of crudeness and uncensored banter,
01:25:15
here's our no nonsense disclaimer served with a side of flag humor.
01:25:20
Look, we're here for a good time, not a politically correct time, all right?
01:25:24
In this crazy world where snowflakes melting, everyone's a critic.
01:25:27
We're just trying to spread some joy without stepping on too many toes.
01:25:30
So here goes, Miss Applesauce particle one.
01:25:32
Let's get ridiculous.
01:25:33
The sole purpose of our discourse, be it from guests, posts or any random
01:25:37
loud mouth, is to tickle your funny bone, tease your gray matter,
01:25:40
and illuminate the path to a mirthful existence.
01:25:42
Any semblance of seriousness is purely accidental.
01:25:45
Article to offending everyone equally.
01:25:47
We're equal opportunity offenders, all right?
01:25:50
We don't give a hoot about your gender.
01:25:51
I know you guys have done this
01:25:52
a hundred times. We're going to be going over
01:25:54
to rumble.com/doldrums for the rest of the show.
01:25:57
Uncensored.
01:25:58
We're here to roast everyone.
01:26:00
We're going to talk about to influencers to our own sorry selves.
01:26:04
Nobody's safe f words.
01:26:06
Not even gab games. Apple pie dude.
01:26:08
Article three screw political correctness.
01:26:11
Listen, we ain't here to hold your hand or sugarcoat anything,
01:26:14
so if our jokes offend you, tough luck.
01:26:17
We're not responsible for any ruffled feathers or hurt feelings.
01:26:20
But hey, if you can take the heat,
01:26:21
we promise we'll dish out some belly laughs and maybe a couple of snorts.
01:26:24
Ha ha ha. Article for fake news.
01:26:26
Thanks for the follow.
01:26:27
Take you on point one for further details.
01:26:30
The tales, rumors, and downright lies you hear here are as fictional
01:26:34
as a $3 bill.
01:26:36
Any resemblance to real life events or people,
01:26:38
whether alive or pushing up daisies, is purely coincidental
01:26:42
and probably a result of us hitting the bottle too hard.
01:26:45
We're pretty sure the Earth is round, and I didn't actually take myself out,
01:26:47
but honestly, who cares?
01:26:49
Article five I don't care.
01:26:52
Parody I care because why not?
01:26:56
Parody and satire are our bread and butter folks
01:27:00
any likeness to actual people or characters?
01:27:03
It's just us having a laugh, not a reason for a lawsuit.
01:27:06
We might not be the smartest cookies in the jar.
01:27:09
Always sure not to stir up some trouble to.
01:27:12
So in closing, if you've made it this far without getting your undies in a twist,
01:27:16
then congrats! You're our kind of people.
01:27:19
We're just here to crack a few tasteless jokes, spread some questionable joy,
01:27:22
and remind everyone that life's too short to be serious all the frickin time.
01:27:26
So buckle up, buttercup, and get ready for a wild ride
01:27:28
to the absurd realms of our humor.
01:27:30
While flags rants. Why?
01:27:43
Am. Ladies and
01:27:49
gentlemen, let's get ready for.
01:27:56
The rumble.
01:27:57
I hope that you're ready to rumble.
01:27:59
I hope you're ready to rumble.
01:28:04
Oh, nice.
01:28:05
You're.
01:28:10
Already frozen.
01:28:15
No, I'm not frozen.
01:28:16
I was just fucking.
01:28:17
Oh, okay. Geez,
01:28:19
I was worried there for a minute.
01:28:20
So back to the swearing king list.
01:28:23
So if it was,
01:28:25
the, I don't know, Arctic, an alien race that lives thousands of years.
01:28:30
That would not be anyone's definition of the word God.
01:28:36
If you're talking about, the the, Arthur C Clarke,
01:28:42
any sufficiently advanced technology would be indistinguishable from magic.
01:28:48
That's not anybody's definition of the word God.
01:28:52
If you're talking about Spinoza's God
01:28:55
being the laws of physics and nature,
01:28:59
that's not anybody's definition of the word God.
01:29:04
Okay.
01:29:04
Sorry.
01:29:06
It would have to be something of a spiritual realm,
01:29:10
supernatural, disembodied spirit.
01:29:14
Yeah.
01:29:16
Mortal.
01:29:18
These are the qualities
01:29:21
of the word capital G. God.
01:29:25
And that's what I say.
01:29:27
Doesn't exist.
01:29:30
Not nature exists.
01:29:38
Extraterrestrials could exist.
01:29:43
Creatures that live thousands of years could possibly exist.
01:29:47
Advanced technologies could exist.
01:29:51
God can't
01:29:53
this time exist?
01:29:54
Okay, Gary?
01:29:57
No. Technically, no,
01:30:00
because of that, right, right.
01:30:02
But so with with three words, I annihilated your argument
01:30:08
because I could replace that was with does
01:30:10
God exist?
01:30:14
Wait,
01:30:14
you can replace the word time with word God, and it works.
01:30:18
No, no.
01:30:19
Does that mean you'll you'll answer it
01:30:22
and you'll say.
01:30:25
No, no, no, no, no or no, no, no.
01:30:29
And I'll say, but
01:30:32
there is
01:30:32
something well, we cannot define and I will prove that later.
01:30:36
I will make you believe that there's something beyond.
01:30:40
Oh, something beyond. Yes.
01:30:42
But I'm sorry. We would call God.
01:30:44
And that's beyond just the wrong word.
01:30:46
Conflating.
01:30:47
No, you're conflating it I never I well, let me rephrase that.
01:30:52
I can only speak for myself.
01:30:53
I'm not conflating it because I don't know what the fuck God is.
01:30:55
I think that's human's way of trying to define the shit you can't define.
01:31:00
So you what you're saying is absolutely correct, but it doesn't
01:31:02
necessarily make
01:31:04
it's not the fact that that that then nothing else exists
01:31:07
just because they called it the wrong thing.
01:31:10
These are all human lives. Yes.
01:31:13
Yeah yeah yeah, yeah.
01:31:14
Mine was simply that God doesn't need human concepts,
01:31:17
but if physics can't prove it and quantum physics can't prove it.
01:31:22
But there's still something that ties those two things together.
01:31:27
Then what is that?
01:31:29
See, I thought you were coming from the angle that,
01:31:32
Because I'll make the argument that if you say that God, exists
01:31:36
outside of time and space, and I just like I.
01:31:40
As I say, that time and space doesn't exist has nothing to do with it.
01:31:46
If it.
01:31:48
All right, so the video I'm going to show later,
01:31:50
which I probably won't because it's so fucking long.
01:31:52
They have now scientifically proven that one millimeter difference in height,
01:31:56
they can measure the time
01:31:59
difference.
01:32:01
So if if things are I can't explain it as well as that.
01:32:04
We're going to have to watch it.
01:32:05
But it literally, in my opinion, defines.
01:32:12
Especially when it gets to the observer watch it
01:32:15
it it somehow I can't
01:32:17
I can't define it if I try to you're going to make me look silly
01:32:20
and you'll have every right to do so, because no human being can ever grasp it.
01:32:24
In fact, the teachers that got close enough to do it,
01:32:27
which you despise use words like turn inside out,
01:32:31
cease to exist, flash so bright that you, you know no one can be near you.
01:32:36
Human mind cannot.
01:32:38
Which which, if you look at the human mind, does look like a little human figure
01:32:42
squatting for some reason.
01:32:43
Now, to me, now, a little bug person.
01:32:47
I don't know what any of this means for what you were saying.
01:32:49
I just wanted you to stop saying it,
01:32:51
okay? No.
01:32:52
We're in the sweet spot of ignorance where we.
01:32:55
We can't really understand everything, and that's a good thing.
01:33:00
That's a good thing.
01:33:01
But then how can you so confidently say there's there's no thing?
01:33:06
I'm not saying there's no thing.
01:33:07
I'm saying there's no God.
01:33:10
What, what I don't see, I don't like your defense is saying that the whole
01:33:13
you listed a bunch of a bunch of stories and examples of you aren't
01:33:18
God trying to explain to God and said, that's not God.
01:33:21
And I agree, but we have to also go further than that
01:33:25
and admit that there's no way that either one of us know anything.
01:33:29
Well, I'm willing to continue the list, but
01:33:33
coming up with an exhaustive list is is good.
01:33:37
Yeah. Crippling.
01:33:39
I like the Egyptian, one of the sun god RA.
01:33:41
That's one of my favorites.
01:33:42
Yeah, yeah.
01:33:44
And and, a lot of these are, like, demonstrably made up, you know,
01:33:51
the, the RA one isn't.
01:33:52
They followed the heavenly bodies.
01:33:53
They did the things do they can even
01:33:55
somebody even mapped it because, you know, okay.
01:33:56
What what is it?
01:33:59
A planet is not what anybody would call God.
01:34:06
What a celestial body.
01:34:08
They would call it the sun from God, and then it might get interpreted to the sun.
01:34:13
We've got words for celestial bodies.
01:34:15
It's celestial bodies.
01:34:17
God don't need to call God.
01:34:19
God didn't die on the rise in three days.
01:34:21
The story that I'm referring to from the Egyptians.
01:34:23
But the sun sure as fuck did.
01:34:27
Yeah,
01:34:28
sometimes some kind of December 2012 line.
01:34:32
It went out of the sky or darkened because they, you know,
01:34:35
they don't know how to explain it.
01:34:37
Three days later it came back. Sure enough.
01:34:41
Amen.
01:34:43
All right.
01:34:45
Okay.
01:34:45
Listen, Okay, man, we're all good.
01:34:47
Crip lady, I did already.
01:34:51
Okay?
01:34:52
Do the next one that I'll be white.
01:34:53
Black.
01:34:56
It'll be white black roller
01:34:59
blade.
01:34:59
You know, an astronaut, Neil Armstrong became the first human to set foot
01:35:03
on the surface of the moon.
01:35:05
The fucking moon, for Christ's sake.
01:35:08
This is Tranquility Base.
01:35:10
The eagle has landed.
01:35:13
Jesus Christ, Houston,
01:35:15
we're on the fucking move over.
01:35:18
Oh, Holy God, I hope so.
01:35:24
We're on the fucking.
01:35:26
Oh, I know, I don't.
01:35:27
I can put this up, but I love so I.
01:35:31
Oh fuck.
01:35:33
Oh I am fucking lutely.
01:35:37
I'm standing on the surface of the fucking most
01:35:41
tree.
01:35:41
The seat of Christ in a chicken basket.
01:35:43
The July 21st basket.
01:35:47
That's hilarious.
01:35:49
That's what he really said.
01:35:53
That's the only reasonable,
01:35:54
uncensored origin.
01:35:58
I think that's the real the real idea.
01:36:00
Broaden our mind.
01:36:02
We've got Lawrence.
01:36:05
We have more audio.
01:36:06
Yeah, we got more real audio about moon stuff.
01:36:09
I used to love real audio, I miss it.
01:36:12
Oh, yeah.
01:36:13
And now you know the rest of the story.
01:36:16
Or no one knows what that means.
01:36:19
Bob's your uncle.
01:36:20
We choose to lie about going to the moon.
01:36:22
We thought it would be easy, but we found out it's hard.
01:36:25
Like, really fucking hard.
01:36:27
Like we're going to have to lie about it. Seriously.
01:36:29
It's really, really fucking hard.
01:36:30
That shit won't happen for another
01:36:31
70 or 80 years the more we just got TV's not too long ago.
01:36:35
They're not even color yet.
01:36:36
How the fuck?
01:36:37
When we go to the moon, we choose to lie about going to go.
01:36:40
Not to confuse the American people, but because we, the ops is out to get us.
01:36:44
I have a plan though.
01:36:45
Hear me out.
01:36:47
We get a soundstage, some actors and a camera crew together.
01:36:52
Nobody will notice the difference.
01:36:54
Especially not the ops.
01:36:56
We are better, faster and smarter than the Ops Oxford comma needed Gary.
01:37:01
Or else. That sounds stupid
01:37:04
as long as the ops doesn't try to Charlie Kirk me,
01:37:07
I know I'll be able to pull off a second term as president,
01:37:11
and we're not really going to give a fuck whether you like it or not.
01:37:14
No, I'm off to go. It's on. Hot bitch.
01:37:16
Who is it? My wife hates motherfuckers.
01:37:20
JFK out.
01:37:23
Drop the.
01:37:23
My Bob's your uncle.
01:37:26
Do we have, breaking news on the finish of the game?
01:37:29
What I didn't hear.
01:37:30
Yeah, I said it many, many times. You have them one.
01:37:34
It's all right.
01:37:34
So you you owe them one.
01:37:37
You go blue one.
01:37:41
Yeah, they look strong.
01:37:42
I have them throughout the tournament.
01:37:44
They're winning by 30 points a game.
01:37:48
Oh, yeah. Okay.
01:37:49
So this guy wonder why he's missing so many fingers.
01:37:55
It looks like an uncircumcised penis.
01:37:57
Yes, I've seen one of those.
01:37:59
What's going on there? I don't understand what the.
01:38:01
So he's taking this angle grinder.
01:38:07
And he's putting these sticks in there.
01:38:09
That'll. That'll help.
01:38:11
That'll make it perfectly safe.
01:38:12
This is. I'll be honest,
01:38:14
safety video.
01:38:17
Look at those gloves.
01:38:19
His fingers are just getting in the way.
01:38:21
Yeah, and they did that one point.
01:38:24
They look like little penises. Now.
01:38:27
Yeah.
01:38:27
Maybe you should try some
01:38:29
because, like, he's done the the the his trial and error and so.
01:38:33
Right. Oh yeah.
01:38:34
And it looks like it's healed up just fine.
01:38:36
And he's working on other fingers. Right.
01:38:38
So yeah, at some point it's stopped.
01:38:41
So what he's working with now is kind of, you know.
01:38:44
Yeah.
01:38:45
Then the the cut off is now out of the way.
01:38:47
Exactly.
01:38:48
He's using the elbow hand more than the the he's right handed.
01:38:53
But man he almost
01:38:55
he trimmed a little close there.
01:39:02
Is anybody else thinking about this?
01:39:04
It's the nail clippers.
01:39:07
It's his right hand.
01:39:08
He can never wrap
01:39:10
them like part of his problem.
01:39:13
Yeah.
01:39:15
They shows wrench and all the little tines are broken off.
01:39:19
Like his poor little fingers.
01:39:24
He got like I don't want
01:39:25
give you anything like he does it because that's how you end up.
01:39:29
He finally started so dangerous.
01:39:32
They turn that on.
01:39:34
You're good if you want to jump on this over it.
01:39:40
Is that it?
01:39:40
That was that was it? Yeah.
01:39:42
Like I really want to fire it up because that looks so friggin dangerous.
01:39:47
I'm not doing that with my hand.
01:39:48
We're going to, by the way,
01:39:49
I've got my rider right over there and I'm not doing that
01:39:53
with the wooden spacers.
01:39:55
That's stupid.
01:39:57
That's insane.
01:39:58
No, no, no, I keep my hands out of danger.
01:40:03
Intentionally saw.
01:40:04
So I'm going to do something different on the show since it's already left.
01:40:07
Oh, please.
01:40:09
I'm going to ask if there's anything that we definitely want to talk to
01:40:11
with Gary that we can play right now from Rumble before playing him in order.
01:40:16
Yeah. Why?
01:40:17
What do you mean? Oh, before you, there's always something.
01:40:20
There's always something that's like. What the fuck, Gary?
01:40:22
We can do that now.
01:40:24
Not right
01:40:26
at all applies.
01:40:27
So we're going to have to do the time one and a whole nother episode.
01:40:30
I just I don't want to just skim through it.
01:40:33
It's I mean y'all.
01:40:34
So it's not like
01:40:35
I had a couple baking videos lined up for last week that we never played.
01:40:40
Yeah.
01:40:41
And that will still never play them.
01:40:43
Okay, good.
01:40:45
They're they're pretty good.
01:40:47
The best way for you to ensure your videos are to play,
01:40:49
to be played would be to stay and then request them.
01:40:53
Nah, I don't remember what I said.
01:40:57
All right then I'm just going to go to the first one.
01:40:59
I'm going to play 17 to play my anger. That's okay.
01:41:02
Are yours to screen when I are yours?
01:41:04
Turning green when I play them, I hope.
01:41:06
No, no.
01:41:08
But let me like reload. Maybe reloading.
01:41:10
Those are now you might be in the playlist hyphen playlist go to playlist.
01:41:14
No. Yeah yeah they are green.
01:41:16
No hyphen. The wrong thing.
01:41:19
Wait, should they turn red?
01:41:22
That's too confusing because and I know rumbles green.
01:41:25
You're right, you're right. You're absolutely right.
01:41:27
But it's wrong.
01:41:28
You're right.
01:41:28
I'm going to be the right way to do it.
01:41:30
But it's wrong okay.
01:41:32
By the fair enough to that number when there's still nine and ten.
01:41:37
Those are I don't because I don't care about those with Gary.
01:41:40
I'm going to that's our that's our shit.
01:41:42
Unless you put them at the back.
01:41:44
Yeah. You're right.
01:41:45
But then when I add I there's a mistake.
01:41:46
I added all the new ones and they went at the end.
01:41:50
All the rumble ones go to the end automatically.
01:41:52
Number.
01:41:53
Oh. 17.
01:41:55
Oh you do not.
01:41:56
Number 17 is the one I just said.
01:41:58
Yeah I was going to just play 17.
01:42:00
17 is a prime number.
01:42:02
Yeah. This is for you, Gary. Okay.
01:42:05
I'm number 17.
01:42:07
I knew that.
01:42:09
Oh, let's play this.
01:42:11
Are you a Christian?
01:42:13
Oh, Christian.
01:42:15
Gary, are you a Christian?
01:42:17
A cultural Christian?
01:42:21
Very, very much so.
01:42:22
Like, why is that exactly? Oh, Jesus saved my life.
01:42:25
Yeah, I'm a sinner.
01:42:25
Give my life to Christ. Most important decision I ever made.
01:42:27
So you believe the Bible is real? Yes.
01:42:29
I believe the Bible is true and real.
01:42:31
Why is that? Well, I could give you the answer.
01:42:33
There's never been an archeological discovery
01:42:35
that has contradicted the truth of the Bible. And then, of course, the wisdom.
01:42:38
There is not a truth of the Bible
01:42:39
that if you apply to your life, your life does not improved dramatically.
01:42:42
I'm sorry, I like Charlie.
01:42:44
I hate to interrupt, but isn't Gobekli Tepe
01:42:47
an archeological site?
01:42:49
Yes, it is.
01:42:50
Doesn't it imply or infer or describe
01:42:54
or show or exhibit some possibilities?
01:42:57
Well, maybe.
01:42:58
Or you know, I say
01:42:59
no, it's just I've never specifically says the timeline in the Bible.
01:43:02
That's what they'll say, right.
01:43:05
And the way he said it is
01:43:07
backwards, like there is no exodus.
01:43:11
There's no archeological evidence of an exodus
01:43:14
or a million Jews being enslaved in Egypt.
01:43:18
Like this is not historical data.
01:43:22
And and the archeological,
01:43:25
evidence doesn't support it.
01:43:28
But he said it backwards.
01:43:29
He said there hasn't been a discovery that contradicted the truth of the Bible.
01:43:33
I mean, of course it's
01:43:35
biblical scholarship.
01:43:38
What's the wisdom?
01:43:39
There's not a truth of the Bible that if you apply to your life,
01:43:41
your life does not improved dramatically.
01:43:43
And then finally, we have the most accurate and transparent
01:43:46
historically robust account that one can have of the most important
01:43:51
year ever to live in that has.
01:43:52
So if you stone everybody to death,
01:43:55
the Bible says you should stone everybody to death.
01:43:59
That would make life better.
01:44:03
Yeah.
01:44:03
Fuck, yeah. What are you talking about? Not.
01:44:06
Not for the person that's fucking off. Fight around.
01:44:08
Fight around.
01:44:09
Fuck! Wait.
01:44:09
What is it? Fuck. Fuck around. Find out.
01:44:13
Yeah, I could give you two examples just today
01:44:16
where I stoning them would have helped my life significantly.
01:44:22
How about,
01:44:24
euthanizing all the Canaanites?
01:44:27
The canines?
01:44:30
Yeah.
01:44:33
I don't know, any,
01:44:37
anytime you wipe out an entire population,
01:44:39
it's genocide.
01:44:43
Again.
01:44:43
What's wrong with that?
01:44:44
Yeah, what's wrong with that?
01:44:46
Which.
01:44:46
Okay, so which general are we talking about?
01:44:51
Are you.
01:44:51
You know, the world?
01:44:53
No, I don't know.
01:44:54
Or I wouldn't have asked.
01:44:56
Jesus of Nazareth.
01:44:57
And the resurrection is the is the pinpoint of my belief
01:45:00
that Jesus did rise from the grave
01:45:02
so that, to be fair, he did ask why he calls himself a Christian.
01:45:07
He didn't say, yeah, what? Why?
01:45:09
You know, we may live what makes Christian mythology real.
01:45:12
So that's not mythology, but that is theology.
01:45:15
If Genesis one one and the resurrection is true, anything in the Bible is possible.
01:45:20
You're looking at the greatest miracle.
01:45:22
The greatest miracle is creation.
01:45:24
And then the fact that Jesus rose from the dead,
01:45:26
I say, how do you know that Jesus rose from the dead?
01:45:28
Well, show me another historical piece of a story
01:45:31
where so many people willingly died a brutal death for a lie.
01:45:35
Every single person around him had everything to lose,
01:45:39
and yet they went to the absolute death
01:45:40
from Paul to Peter to the half brother of James saying that Jesus.
01:45:44
Okay, so
01:45:46
you say things like from A to Z to show
01:45:49
a huge gap of Peter to Paul, that's the saint, that's one fall away.
01:45:53
I mean, yeah, yeah.
01:45:56
They're right.
01:45:58
All right. Whatever.
01:45:59
Continue. Charlie, you're you're being a Pete.
01:46:01
This is Lord Jesus rose from the dead.
01:46:03
Not to mention, if you were going to fake a story,
01:46:05
you would not use female witnesses in the ancient world.
01:46:07
In the scriptures, it said that the the women were the first one
01:46:10
to see Jesus Christ.
01:46:11
If you're trying to fake a story, you would never do that.
01:46:13
Not to mention the 500 people that saw Jesus after he rose from the dead,
01:46:15
and then the later church that lived under persecution,
01:46:18
under the belief that Jesus Christ was the Son of God? Are you?
01:46:26
I he would roll over in his grave.
01:46:28
He heard himself say that he sounds so ridiculous.
01:46:34
He said, I know all that.
01:46:35
Yeah, you heard him in the movie.
01:46:37
I've heard it all.
01:46:39
It's,
01:46:40
We don't have 500 witnesses.
01:46:43
We have one testimony saying 500 people witness that it's.
01:46:48
There's a big difference there.
01:46:50
Like the difference between peeing in the pool
01:46:52
and peeing into the pool.
01:46:56
Big difference.
01:46:57
And it's just one of that stuff that where when you peed in the pool, you guys.
01:47:01
Yeah.
01:47:02
And then you get a about you never saw it firsthand.
01:47:05
That was a thing that actually existed.
01:47:07
That was the. Yeah.
01:47:08
There's a cat uncle that the dog does that.
01:47:11
No, no, there has never been I've never ran across that.
01:47:14
Yeah, it is life.
01:47:16
No one I've never
01:47:17
been one believes in the blue is the blue pee chemical.
01:47:21
But he doesn't believe in his Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ and the weak.
01:47:25
Right?
01:47:25
I believe in chemistry, but not fictional nonsense.
01:47:30
Okay, well, let's test that then.
01:47:33
Okay. Shall we?
01:47:35
Sure do. They have pee?
01:47:38
Pool blue is simply what I asked.
01:47:39
No, there is no chemical that turns pool water blue when someone urinates in it.
01:47:43
The idea of dye that instant detects instantly detects
01:47:46
urine is a widespread urban legend or wives tale,
01:47:49
used to scare children into using the restroom.
01:47:53
Oh, I believe it's still I want to believe.
01:47:57
No, I do.
01:48:00
Nope.
01:48:01
So knowing that now, maybe you'll be more open to.
01:48:04
And nope, I doubt it.
01:48:06
All right, I believe I want to believe.
01:48:10
There it is.
01:48:10
You know, man, if it wasn't for believing in what?
01:48:12
God man there, you wouldn't have anything in life.
01:48:15
Man, that was that would be so sad
01:48:19
if that was true, guys.
01:48:20
Better yet, thankfully it's, you know, because otherwise,
01:48:24
you're not going to make it in this world, man.
01:48:28
That's why Gary, the mindless, trendy man.
01:48:34
All mindless, trendy?
01:48:37
Yeah.
01:48:39
When the milk in your fridge has expired.
01:48:42
Where the devil is stuck in your shoe.
01:48:45
When you feel it.
01:48:46
It's take a short time for your stock at the end of a queue.
01:48:52
Don't get disgruntled or grumpy.
01:48:54
Yeah, try not to overreact.
01:48:57
Your blood pressure will fall when you simply recall
01:49:01
this one inescapable fact.
01:49:04
Soon you'll be dead.
01:49:06
But up
01:49:08
you go, pushing up daisies or cat in an urn when you're dead.
01:49:12
Mother, father.
01:49:14
And your crops will not care about all of your shit.
01:49:19
When the Wi-Fi is slow at your cafe
01:49:23
and they sat you right next to door, this is like ten minutes long.
01:49:27
If you would like to keep going now.
01:49:29
Okay? No.
01:49:33
That was a happy song, right, I liked it,
01:49:35
no, you know, did it give you comfort
01:49:39
about your time? See?
01:49:41
Makes me feel better about everything.
01:49:43
I can't even say your time here anymore because that doesn't exist.
01:49:47
There's some crazy shit that they learned in 2025.
01:49:50
And there there's an experiment that's going on right now that if they solve it,
01:49:54
they will prove that there is a
01:49:57
5% dive.
01:50:00
Can't I don't it's so I have to play it.
01:50:03
Baby, I was with you.
01:50:05
I really it takes me a little bit of time to understand what he was saying.
01:50:08
You know what I mean?
01:50:10
It's unfortunate because it takes me longer
01:50:12
than it takes to understand it, to actually say it.
01:50:18
Oh, dear.
01:50:20
What do you.
01:50:21
Oh, he's gonna like, you know, looks like, you know, maybe I don't know,
01:50:25
I don't know.
01:50:26
There was a time travel whistleblower named John Teeter,
01:50:31
titular John Teeter.
01:50:34
He said, we discovered time travel in 2034,
01:50:40
and he he uses two singularities and he can zip around
01:50:44
from time to time, but, he can go backwards on this timeline.
01:50:49
But every time he goes forward, he ends up on a different timeline.
01:50:52
And it's a multiverse kind of thing.
01:50:54
But, some of the, some of that stuff about like, the,
01:50:58
like there was a scary thing, like there's no time after like 25, 56
01:51:04
or something like that, but, but the this crazy
01:51:08
utopian future is,
01:51:11
they tell the citizens of the world at that point to do something productive.
01:51:16
Please.
01:51:18
And then you're free to do whatever you want.
01:51:21
It's interesting work without incentive.
01:51:24
That doesn't work out well, I know
01:51:28
I like how you believe that, but
01:51:30
no, I don't.
01:51:31
I'm telling you, there's there's, there's John Peters story out there, but
01:51:37
it appears we have a clip of the future where what everyone has no incentive.
01:51:41
This is like the future yet on the John Teeter story.
01:51:44
I hear you shit on religion cut off.
01:51:46
And so it was kind of I just got a different vibe from I was here.
01:51:50
Real quick point. Good.
01:51:52
Hey, boo,
01:51:54
you know where you at?
01:51:56
The future.
01:51:57
Make sure to look both ways before you're crossing the street.
01:52:02
Safety first, my boy.
01:52:07
So when I do travel time zones,
01:52:08
one of my jokes is I like to tell people that I'm from the future.
01:52:13
Yeah, and it takes them a second
01:52:14
to get out there, like, you know, some of the time,
01:52:17
every time you fly, you change your, your, your length of time, existing,
01:52:21
change the people after you meet back up with them on the ground real quick.
01:52:25
Well, I measured a different time, you know, where you at?
01:52:30
So make sure to look both ways before you cross in the shower.
01:52:32
Or 2 or 3 and
01:52:34
safety first.
01:52:37
In the future.
01:52:39
In the future,
01:52:41
I don't know.
01:52:42
I've got my little small little things that I like to pick up.
01:52:45
Do they have some I go by the wayside is that's still a thing.
01:52:48
I know some are still exists.
01:52:50
It just seems like it is a fad.
01:52:52
Fads that's come and go that those faddish.
01:52:55
I wish everything else would do that.
01:53:00
Nothing's permanent.
01:53:02
It's not instantly going.
01:53:07
Yeah, that's that's the something.
01:53:09
So you're on a link, right?
01:53:11
Go to the next one.
01:53:12
Skip 23 because 24 has it baked in.
01:53:14
It's a better link.
01:53:15
Oh see I thought they were both.
01:53:18
Yeah I just 23 has like the article in it but fucking 24 is it.
01:53:24
Does the whole shebang.
01:53:27
I want the whole shebang.
01:53:29
But for the Chase
01:53:32
you guys think that fucking you have player
01:53:34
it is fucking fucking asshole.
01:53:37
Yeah.
01:53:37
Axel Vandenberg, the BrewDog are you gonna play it or no.
01:53:42
Yeah, yeah. He hurt his leg in the game. Let's go.
01:53:44
This motherfucker.
01:53:49
So this has all kinds of shit in it,
01:53:51
okay? This.
01:53:52
It's not just a motorcycle crash.
01:53:54
I want to see it.
01:53:56
It's a moment where you saw a seven month old baby girl has been shot.
01:54:00
She's seen jumping up and down in panic for the family's privacy.
01:54:04
We're not showing their faces.
01:54:05
When she looked at us, running away with the baby is bleeding.
01:54:08
She go crazy.
01:54:10
Family had to run and his blood was gushing and gushing into Bodega
01:54:15
Harbor after gunfire erupted around 1:20 p.m., two men on a scooter
01:54:19
pass through the intersection of Moore and Humble.
01:54:22
Sitting at the
01:54:23
rear of the moped can be seen at Moore and Humble.
01:54:27
That is the most incredible street intersection I've heard today.
01:54:31
Yeah, more humble, more home being taking out a gun
01:54:35
and discharging at least two rounds.
01:54:38
Our seven victim was sitting inside one of these strollers.
01:54:43
The blood.
01:54:44
The baby was taken to the hospital where she died.
01:54:47
Detectives say this sent a sleep to crash their moped.
01:54:50
Head-On.
01:54:50
With a car just two blocks away with a bomb on their head.
01:54:53
A crash into the no. Ten flip moment.
01:54:56
Police like definitely stops and is like, hey, are you okay?
01:54:58
I think and it's like, dude, if you only knew it.
01:55:00
They like, they want to shoot you and take your fucking car like
01:55:04
they want to get
01:55:05
away with some shit right now.
01:55:08
You say the man sitting in the car is one
01:55:10
like he tries to step on it and it just I Briere is not here.
01:55:15
You are in custody on an unrelated charge.
01:55:17
As he's being questioned in the shooting,
01:55:19
the driver of the moped abandoned the scooter and is still on the run.
01:55:23
Mayor Mamdani calling this a dark day.
01:55:26
There are no words that can mend the heartbreak
01:55:29
this family is feeling now, now, embrace.
01:55:32
Watch. Whatever there are.
01:55:33
We caught them. We hung them.
01:55:36
I mean, it might not fix anything, but it helps.
01:55:38
Oh, doesn't mean enough to kill the whole.
01:55:42
It's not that it's been left in their lives.
01:55:45
It's a moment a mother realizes her.
01:55:51
Yeah.
01:55:52
That's all. That's what it's done.
01:55:54
Yeah, it started over.
01:55:56
Okay. Never mind.
01:55:57
I thought they already did the slow mo. The.
01:56:01
Yeah, it's pretty cool,
01:56:05
Oh, you could jump to more baby stuff, but that would be jumping the line
01:56:10
is 28.
01:56:10
Is another baby.
01:56:17
You want me to play that one?
01:56:19
If you want.
01:56:20
Yeah. Let's do a palate cleanser.
01:56:23
But another two to the babies.
01:56:24
Back to back.
01:56:25
Yeah. Let's just
01:56:27
just that baby it. Oh. Never mind.
01:56:29
Good to go
01:56:31
cooking a bit.
01:56:33
How about them puppy?
01:56:34
Those babies do it.
01:56:37
Duh duh duh duh duh duh duh duh duh duh duh
01:56:41
duh duh duh duh.
01:56:45
Oh. We got.
01:56:45
Okay, this is real good. That's it.
01:56:49
I didn't send it in.
01:56:49
I love that song below.
01:56:52
Average. Average.
01:56:57
Yeah.
01:56:57
She's older if you think she's probably oh, she's old.
01:57:00
So that's not bad.
01:57:01
When you when you realize she's old,
01:57:03
right.
01:57:04
Makes Mary Burke say one more time.
01:57:06
I don't know if we realize that she's old.
01:57:09
Makes it better.
01:57:10
She knows she's old.
01:57:12
Oh, my life.
01:57:14
Every morning.
01:57:18
Hot off.
01:57:20
I don't give a shit.
01:57:21
What is this? Fucking page six again?
01:57:23
I got no video.
01:57:25
What is it?
01:57:26
All right, Craig six.
01:57:27
It's the other baby.
01:57:29
Why did you jump?
01:57:32
You said.
01:57:32
I thought you said jump.
01:57:34
You said two babies in a row.
01:57:36
Yeah, I said, all right, let's do a palate cleanser first.
01:57:38
Let's have this one.
01:57:41
Does not have a, video, video.
01:57:44
But there was a body of a newborn baby
01:57:45
that was found inside a portable toilet near a, popular rest waffle House.
01:57:49
Authorities revealed the baby was alive at birth.
01:57:51
Apparently, the restaurant chain is waffle House.
01:57:54
It was made in Louisiana.
01:57:55
And trust me, it was not when I was just there,
01:57:59
which I was just there.
01:58:01
Emergency services were called in the area.
01:58:04
Woman allegedly walked into the restaurant and told staff
01:58:06
she had given birth in a nearby portable toilet.
01:58:09
I like how you made the actual birth sound.
01:58:12
The baby popped out, man.
01:58:15
Yeah.
01:58:16
Police and paramedics were dispatched to the waffle House at 52 West Bank
01:58:20
Expressway around 3:17 a.m.
01:58:22
local time.
01:58:22
Officers later found the baby boy's body in the tank of a porta potty
01:58:26
at a construction site near the Mississippi River
01:58:29
at 62 Westbank Expressway, around a block away.
01:58:33
So there are Ty in this fucking waffle House.
01:58:35
Did this a little too hard, like she just walked into the
01:58:40
who does that?
01:58:41
I mean, if you're going to toss a baby
01:58:43
and you're going to walk into the nearest establishment,
01:58:45
go, yeah, yeah, I guess what I just did.
01:58:48
Hey, ma'am, you got a coupon?
01:58:49
No, but I got this.
01:58:51
You guys got some rags, I got I got some shit to clean up here.
01:58:54
I wash up in your bathroom.
01:58:55
Ma'am, if you're going to have a child and I.
01:58:57
Right, rusty, you're going to have to buy something.
01:58:58
Please.
01:59:00
So, according to the Jefferson Parish
01:59:02
Coroner's office, the infant's body was discovered in liquid cleaning.
01:59:05
Cleaning chemicals inside the portable tank.
01:59:08
An autopsy found the baby died from asphyxia by drowning.
01:59:11
So definitely was still valuable.
01:59:14
Oh, that's.
01:59:15
You say viable?
01:59:16
You mean to put on the waffles?
01:59:18
It was still or.
01:59:20
Yeah, a viable like.
01:59:23
That's just the classic abortion, right?
01:59:25
That's what they do anyway, right?
01:59:27
I have no idea.
01:59:28
A newborn weighed 7.2 pounds and had been out a classic
01:59:32
mother's pregnancy.
01:59:33
A baby had not been given a name.
01:59:36
So let's, Do you think you want to name the baby?
01:59:38
Can we name the baby?
01:59:41
We're asking people, why do you like waffle House?
01:59:44
You know what? I really like this about a waffle House.
01:59:46
I can stop by your anytime, day or night that I've been patient.
01:59:49
And how about, Teddy, whatever this guy's name is,
01:59:53
is it good breakfast, lunch or dinner?
01:59:56
If it doesn't matter what time I leave the morning
01:59:58
or what time I get down of the evening, I can come to the waffle House.
02:00:01
Know what I really like about it?
02:00:03
When I end up at the doghouse, I can always come to waffle House
02:00:07
and then after it is sandwich much sandwich chef Ramsay
02:00:13
yeah.
02:00:13
Officials, said the infant is likely to receive a pauper's burial,
02:00:18
and thus four people come forward before the end of April.
02:00:20
What does that pay you, PR?
02:00:23
Super poor people by back when nobody's going to, like, take like,
02:00:29
responsibility for it because it says unless relatives come forward or forward
02:00:32
by the end of April.
02:00:33
This refers to a basic
02:00:35
okay, this refers to a basic funeral paid for by the state or local authority.
02:00:38
When a person dies.
02:00:38
Wait, there's three stem cells or some stem cells.
02:00:41
All we have to do is.
02:00:42
Yep. In the local area, every pickup locally.
02:00:46
So child's mother was homeless at the time of birth.
02:00:49
Under the law, babies can be left at hospitals,
02:00:54
fire stations, police stations or public health units
02:00:56
without risk of being prosecuted for abandonment.
02:00:59
Babies can then be treated at hospital, so.
02:01:04
That hospital important?
02:01:06
I just
02:01:07
mothers know that they can use the safe haven law.
02:01:09
So yeah, you can just drop that bitch off.
02:01:11
I was done and I just I didn't want to say 10:00 and dropped it off at that.
02:01:16
They're taking over there.
02:01:17
They don't take care of it.
02:01:19
Now I can just go and get preggers again.
02:01:22
Yeah, that happened with Mrs. Gary.
02:01:24
And then Gary made me a sandwich.
02:01:26
So we're out here
02:01:29
for me.
02:01:32
Let's talk in the kitchen on a Friday night in Europe.
02:01:36
If I could have, you know,
02:01:38
we'll do la forma de la Croix.
02:01:40
I don't
02:01:42
I don't just you don't do this is if la
02:01:46
let us do this on.
02:01:48
I do like on food.
02:01:51
The Philadelphia can up the simple.
02:01:56
Okay.
02:01:57
Well, if I didn't stick it.
02:02:00
Oh, partner.
02:02:04
This him it's a Ducati.
02:02:07
Even if I get to rest.
02:02:10
But I'm in Philadelphia.
02:02:14
She tried to go to a local peanut simulator.
02:02:17
She did?
02:02:18
I have egg rolls in my wrist.
02:02:20
I grew up with brother.
02:02:22
It was literally no pasta.
02:02:26
I'm the only one just laughing my ass off for no reason at dinner.
02:02:30
Like, do you want an egg? Do you want an egg roll?
02:02:32
Do you want to egg roll? Oh, no.
02:02:33
Egg roll. Who?
02:02:35
Why are you saying it that way?
02:02:36
To the vegetable egg roll.
02:02:38
It's 1.0.
02:02:44
Egg roll.
02:02:44
I don't know, I just like, I just like how raunchy she is.
02:02:49
How bet you do.
02:02:51
How wrong it what she is.
02:02:53
It's so the.
02:02:55
That's why I put this in front of this one rough night I was she
02:03:01
was evil. I
02:03:04
was she, you know, I'll tell you that
02:03:07
little one. No,
02:03:10
it's too bad. Together.
02:03:11
What is it
02:03:14
you learn from her?
02:03:15
Editing is very delicate.
02:03:19
Well, she
02:03:20
she's got a video
02:03:23
of the air and making that noise. So.
02:03:27
Is that a sandwich?
02:03:28
Yeah. Sandwich? Yeah.
02:03:29
I will cook
02:03:32
the lesson.
02:03:33
So I'm doing
02:03:36
nondestructive.
02:03:38
Pretty sure. Looped.
02:03:40
It is.
02:03:42
Yeah.
02:03:44
That's the first time I shared one of her videos, but,
02:03:48
I don't think we'll be watching any more of her.
02:03:51
I don't think you guys quite enjoy it quite as much as I do not.
02:03:55
But I almost like half understand it.
02:03:59
Like nearly half,
02:04:03
I don't trust the French.
02:04:04
You know who else I don't trust anybody.
02:04:08
I don't trust,
02:04:12
What's somebody, a disabled motorist?
02:04:14
That. That's not what I'm trying to.
02:04:16
Somebody who's retired.
02:04:18
Oh, blind driver
02:04:20
know somebody who's broken down.
02:04:22
I don't know what to call them.
02:04:24
Oh, the road.
02:04:25
Oh, yeah.
02:04:26
Disabled vehicle. Okay. Oh.
02:04:30
Oh, that was a Segway
02:04:32
to you.
02:04:34
It was a non Segway.
02:04:36
Oh. Segway there.
02:04:40
All right. Let's see what this is.
02:04:42
There's no sound on this video so we can't get distracted.
02:04:47
I'm kind of distracted.
02:04:52
Wait.
02:04:52
There's a street sign.
02:04:56
I think it's reversed.
02:04:58
There's a street sign with no sign on it.
02:05:00
That's confusing.
02:05:05
I don't even know where the sign went.
02:05:06
Y'all saw it?
02:05:08
I was going, oh.
02:05:10
Then I'm gonna go back farther.
02:05:12
Yeah.
02:05:12
Right there.
02:05:13
See, there's a sign with no sign on it.
02:05:15
Why is that? There?
02:05:19
That is nothing.
02:05:20
No story.
02:05:20
I just noticed that it's for the other direction.
02:05:23
Right. But no signs on that side either.
02:05:25
Go back.
02:05:26
Oh, wow. There's police right there, too.
02:05:28
I didn't notice that.
02:05:32
Oh. This might be the whole video.
02:05:34
Well, that's good, though.
02:05:35
It's only three minutes long. Oh, here.
02:05:36
Okay, here's our disabled motor.
02:05:38
Not only is he disabled, but he looks injured.
02:05:42
You see him?
02:05:43
Do you see him?
02:05:44
Yeah.
02:05:45
He's got a red shirt on laying in front of a white car.
02:05:56
Oh. He's okay.
02:05:58
Or is he okay?
02:06:05
Oh, well, what do you do now?
02:06:08
Why hasn't he already gassed it?
02:06:09
Dude, I would have fucking random over when he was in front.
02:06:13
Just. Just like that.
02:06:15
Holy shit. He's been the fuck out of them now,
02:06:18
Oh, that was a good one.
02:06:21
That one landed.
02:06:23
Oh, that one was it.
02:06:24
Don't hit him in the back of the head. You're just gonna hurt your hand.
02:06:27
All right,
02:06:29
you go for the neck,
02:06:31
getting them in the back of the neck.
02:06:33
I've got a real problem with this.
02:06:34
Because the only people that stop the whole people are good people.
02:06:38
So the only people that get attacked in this case are good people.
02:06:42
I can't find any backstory to this.
02:06:44
I don't know if he was unconscious and woke up or if it was a trap.
02:06:47
His door.
02:06:49
You'll notice his door on the white car looked like it was fucked up.
02:06:52
Look like it was bent over. Yeah, it was like, oh yeah.
02:06:56
The champion has beaten off the challenger,
02:06:59
at least for now.
02:07:05
Okay, so that was graphic.
02:07:09
That was the kind of brown shirt is the driver of the car that snapped.
02:07:14
Yeah, but but now he's still getting his ass kicked.
02:07:17
So there are other people that stopped.
02:07:21
And they are kicking the shit out of him.
02:07:23
Actually, you can't see it, but they are.
02:07:26
Okay. Good luck.
02:07:28
Fucking loser. Coward.
02:07:31
Coward. Loser.
02:07:32
Fucking cunt.
02:07:41
I don't know if it's over eight cars away.
02:07:44
At least he's. He's getting away, sir.
02:07:47
How are they looking away?
02:07:49
Yeah, he's getting away.
02:07:50
Is that although it is weird.
02:07:52
It is weird because I had, not a similar incident,
02:07:56
but I had an incident where somebody was breaking into one of my cars.
02:08:01
Took my girlfriend, who ended up being my wife's purse,
02:08:05
and then me and this other
02:08:07
gentleman who was much younger than me and very athletic.
02:08:11
I was like,
02:08:11
let's get him, because we went outside and I was like, once we secured the car,
02:08:15
he ran away.
02:08:16
I'm like, I try to chase him a little bit, but I was probably 30.
02:08:20
The 25 year old, chased him down for two hours
02:08:23
and caught the motherfucker. Wow.
02:08:27
But then we were like, okay, this is before cell phones.
02:08:30
Mind you.
02:08:31
Yeah. Like what? We caught him. What do you.
02:08:33
What do you do? Just wait for the police to arrive.
02:08:35
Call the police. Beat the shit out of him. Kill him.
02:08:38
We were literally having to. He's like, dude, why you do?
02:08:40
Why you dog me, man? You just.
02:08:41
You should just let me go.
02:08:42
Why are you dogging me? Like.
02:08:44
Because you broke into the wrong car.
02:08:45
You broke into my car and took my wife's purse.
02:08:49
And then when we started chasing you, you didn't even dump the purse.
02:08:51
You tried to still run away and get shit out of the purse.
02:08:54
And we were poor. We were paupers.
02:08:56
There was nothing to steal.
02:08:58
Maybe a half pack of cigarets.
02:09:00
And you were doing poppers?
02:09:03
Oh, yeah?
02:09:03
How low can you poppers?
02:09:04
Those are so good. No.
02:09:09
So. Yeah.
02:09:09
What would you do once you caught somebody that, you know, doing?
02:09:12
Not something horribly wrong.
02:09:13
Like you need to defend yourself to the death, but
02:09:16
like theft or some asshole attacks you on the road,
02:09:20
I'd give them a beating that they would
02:09:22
remember for a while and take back the property.
02:09:25
But what if he starts crawling away?
02:09:26
Are you done? You just let him. Don't run.
02:09:29
Let him go.
02:09:31
Look, you can still see him in the door.
02:09:32
Reflection, writhing in pain.
02:09:34
Yeah, I don't I don't press charges.
02:09:36
I don't sue.
02:09:38
Oh, the police will take care of that.
02:09:40
It's out in public. You don't need to press charges.
02:09:43
Okay?
02:09:47
I think they'll press charges
02:09:49
on behalf of you for the state.
02:09:54
Let me speed it up a little bit.
02:09:56
Oh, I got subpoenaed.
02:09:59
I have to show up to court today.
02:10:01
I'm sorry, I'm sorry. What?
02:10:04
I got subpoenaed.
02:10:06
I shouldn't say that word.
02:10:07
Subpoenas.
02:10:09
I got subpoenaed.
02:10:11
Yeah.
02:10:12
So sexy.
02:10:15
You might remember from a previous show,
02:10:19
someone who built this studio behind me.
02:10:24
Hey, there.
02:10:24
Just wanted to give you a quick update on what's been going on around here.
02:10:29
It's not him, but, But
02:10:34
the, the.
02:10:35
Yeah, the guy who who built all this,
02:10:38
he's back in jail.
02:10:41
So we're not going to be seeing
02:10:43
our other our friend for quite some time.
02:10:47
Does he do things wrong? Bad.
02:10:49
He don't say anything.
02:10:52
No, he I not that I know of.
02:10:55
And that's why I'm going to make a terrible witness.
02:10:58
They're they're making me a hostile witness in his case.
02:11:01
Seriously?
02:11:03
Yeah.
02:11:04
And, I have one thing to say.
02:11:06
Yeah.
02:11:10
Oh. Yeah.
02:11:29
All these charged with, the
02:11:30
the subpoena that I saw was driving on a suspended license plate.
02:11:35
Number one.
02:11:36
I didn't see him driving for number two.
02:11:39
I didn't see his license suspended.
02:11:41
So I'm not a good witness.
02:11:46
I didn't see anything.
02:11:49
So how helpful am I going to be?
02:11:51
But I'm going to take the day off,
02:11:53
dress up, go into court.
02:11:56
They're going to make you
02:11:59
say, say something.
02:12:00
Don't say. Yeah. Do you have to say anything?
02:12:02
I do not recall. We shouldn't talk about it.
02:12:04
I do not recall it.
02:12:08
Right.
02:12:09
It doesn't matter. Oh.
02:12:13
Oh, no.
02:12:14
Oh, I know you can't incriminate yourself, but I.
02:12:17
I don't want to incriminate my body either.
02:12:20
My J Navy is not playing,
02:12:27
That's not cool.
02:12:29
Come on. Jaden, did you hear about J.
02:12:31
Navy, former piston?
02:12:34
No. Fuck.
02:12:39
What happened is the breaking news.
02:12:41
No. Oh.
02:12:44
Very good.
02:12:48
J Navy was waived by the Bulls because
02:12:53
they have pride month
02:12:55
in the NBA, and he okay, doesn't.
02:12:57
He's very Christian.
02:12:59
Okay. Yeah.
02:13:01
So he said something to the effect, which I'm going to find it.
02:13:05
I'll find another.
02:13:08
There we go.
02:13:10
I just had to find another link of the same thing
02:13:12
I actually had just him talking.
02:13:14
But this is somebody else talking about it. We'll just have to deal with
02:13:18
an Ivy after only playing
02:13:19
four games with the team for racist anti LGBTQ
02:13:23
comments on social media, including this 45 minute live stream
02:13:27
on his Instagram where he said A few of these things.
02:13:32
That the world can proclaim LGBTQ.
02:13:40
Right.
02:13:41
They have, they have.
02:13:42
They proclaim Pride Month and the NBA,
02:13:47
they proclaiming,
02:13:49
they proclaim they they show it to the world.
02:13:52
They say, come, come,
02:13:54
come join us for pride, for pride month.
02:13:58
I'm going to come to celebrate unrighteousness.
02:14:02
I'm going to come.
02:14:05
They proclaim it almost evil, sinister.
02:14:11
They put it on the billboards.
02:14:14
They proclaim the streets unrighteousness.
02:14:20
So how is it that that one can't speak righteousness?
02:14:24
How is it one that how, how how are they to say that, You.
02:14:29
Man, this man is crazy.
02:14:32
Don't you don't want to talk the way this Bible talks.
02:14:36
You should keep your mouth shut,
02:14:39
make judgments
02:14:41
on certain things.
02:14:47
So? So how is it
02:14:48
when when the gospel is preached?
02:14:53
That people hate it,
02:14:56
don't want.
02:14:57
They don't want to hear it and they think is is strange
02:15:01
when someone preaches the gospel, the true gospel.
02:15:05
God did not make
02:15:08
a man
02:15:10
to to be with a man. How?
02:15:13
How God did not make a girl to be with a girl.
02:15:18
God made a man.
02:15:21
Why are you for the purpose of procreation?
02:15:24
Let's just be real. Other child. How else?
02:15:26
How can a woman, how can a woman bear a child with a woman?
02:15:32
How? Homeless.
02:15:36
They they they go to the doctor and they they, it's
02:15:41
it can't happen physically.
02:15:43
They have the same body part.
02:15:44
They cannot grow. They cannot have.
02:15:47
They cannot bear
02:15:49
to tried to show that to Gary with the unless they get something sweet.
02:15:53
Oh yeah. Right. Yeah. God.
02:15:54
God help me. Repeat.
02:15:56
Did it work on my woman? No.
02:15:59
He made a woman theory for the man night.
02:16:02
That's.
02:16:02
That's why that's exactly what God made.
02:16:05
He made things good.
02:16:06
He made the trees.
02:16:08
He made the sun.
02:16:11
If the sun was ever closer, we would burn.
02:16:14
But he made it in a proper place.
02:16:16
So that that we have.
02:16:18
We get the proper light as above, so below.
02:16:21
In the day, we had one more video
02:16:24
that one more close up the, the grass.
02:16:30
I'm not even going to end.
02:16:30
I'm going to act like he's still here.
02:16:32
So in the contrast to that, seems like a righteous, wholesome man,
02:16:37
whether with whether you believe what he believes is poppycock or not,
02:16:43
he still is trying to say that he has a standard
02:16:46
that doesn't equal the standard of his employer.
02:16:50
And his employer fired him for that.
02:16:57
And on the other hand,
02:16:58
now here's our government,
02:17:01
former government actually,
02:17:04
wait, is this video not going to play either?
02:17:06
Is he a government official?
02:17:11
Oh my God, something is wrong with all my videos.
02:17:15
Oh, there goes the Daily Mail show.
02:17:17
The husband of now former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi
02:17:20
Noem is pretty funny, wearing what looked like fake breasts.
02:17:24
Why ain't all of it raises security concerns about potential
02:17:28
blackmail attempts and vetting procedures, or the lack thereof?
02:17:32
Nobody cares. What do you want? So this is CNN.
02:17:35
Why are they outraged over like, some trans she used to be saying, is
02:17:39
right there, right there.
02:17:40
They're literally shaming trans.
02:17:42
Tell us more because it's so bad.
02:17:46
How dare you hear about the story?
02:17:47
Well, Jake, this news about Brian Nome is ricocheting all the country.
02:17:52
Now, all of a sudden, all of a sudden,
02:17:53
the left is laughing with us at trans stuff.
02:17:55
It's because I'm laughing at this.
02:17:57
This is hilarious.
02:17:58
I feel bad for the Nome bitch, I don't you didn't see.
02:18:00
Oh, we're ready for this bar.
02:18:02
The pictures too, as they appeared in the Daily.
02:18:07
Too. Those are balloons.
02:18:09
It's weird. In the nipples are so like.
02:18:11
It's like
02:18:12
they made fun of it pretty good on SNL.
02:18:15
I don't like SNL. They have been funny for a long time.
02:18:17
But they did.
02:18:18
They when they did the whole show.
02:18:20
Him dressed for the trans.
02:18:21
But all right. So I got gotta
02:18:25
man who has a slightly odd sexual proclivity.
02:18:27
They had an issue with this.
02:18:29
This.
02:18:33
Was the admiral of the fucking Navy
02:18:37
this this Rachel Levine.
02:18:42
Whoa, man.
02:18:44
No, I'm just saying that they allowed this.
02:18:46
They made, you know, they didn't just.
02:18:47
They didn't say, oh, this is black male material,
02:18:51
right?
02:18:53
But this guy
02:18:56
and I mean, I don't their
02:18:58
balloons, it's just weird.
02:19:01
It's in costumes with extremely large breast.
02:19:05
This is the husband of Christina Larson, who is like who?
02:19:10
You said the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security for President
02:19:14
Donald Trump.
02:19:15
She is now a special envoy appointed by Trump as part of a security
02:19:20
initiative aimed at combating drug cartels, a New York Post says.
02:19:24
A representative for the news said Kristi Noem is devastated
02:19:29
by this news and her family was blindsided by it.
02:19:32
There is no indication that this had anything to do with her
02:19:36
dismissal from Homeland Security and the mail, says Trump told them
02:19:40
he is surprised by the family's statement about Brian's behavior.
02:19:45
They confirmed it, the mail says Trump's
02:19:48
well, wow, I feel badly for the family if that's okay.
02:19:51
He almost did the Trump voice for a second. That's kind of cool.
02:19:54
Well, wow, that's too bad. Can't rewind.
02:19:57
I just going about it.
02:19:59
Of course, this is precisely that kind of matter
02:20:01
that security experts have long said must be ferreted out
02:20:05
during the confirmation process for this has to be a joke
02:20:08
because it presents such an obvious he's trolling the entire party
02:20:12
might want to blackmail or leverage that information against Kristi Noem.
02:20:17
Undoubtedly, there will be a lot of questions from Congress.
02:20:19
Well, they sure were polite enough to wait till she was.
02:20:22
She knew nothing about fire.
02:20:23
If it did know why, it went ahead with Noem's confirmation.
02:20:29
I'm thing
02:20:30
that's comical about this whole situation.
02:20:33
I dare you all to find one thing
02:20:36
that's comical about this whole situation.
02:20:40
Derek, I dare you.
02:20:42
I dare you to make a joke about my big beautiful balloon breasts.
02:20:47
I dare you, Michael. Hey!
02:20:50
Hey, Michael, and dare you to kink shame me on national TV
02:20:54
about my insane clown Juggalos and tiny
02:20:58
teeny little pink bike shorts.
02:21:02
No, man, I got nothing to say.
02:21:03
Good. That's all I had.
02:21:06
So I got you audience, Anything to say?
02:21:10
Anything.
02:21:13
You got anything to say?
02:21:15
Liberal New York, about a conservative man's blogs.
02:21:21
Exactly, I thought so.
02:21:23
Thank you. Cards. Thank you. Card.
02:21:25
Guys, do you have anything to say about my bimbo
02:21:28
business?
02:21:35
Exactly, I thought so.
02:21:36
And Lorne Lorne Michaels, care to comment on my big Chumbawamba?
02:21:46
Thoughts on what?
02:21:47
About my wife, Kristi Noem?
02:21:49
Anything to add about my sweater?
02:21:51
Puppies.
02:21:54
Did someone say puppies?
02:21:59
Oh, right.
02:22:00
Okay. You know, it's funny.
02:22:01
And dog Christy shot has anything to say? Oh.
02:22:09
Good boy.
02:22:10
And you, la roach.
02:22:15
Mama,
02:22:16
you need to snatch that waist in and turn them things out.
02:22:19
Shoulders back, pussy forward
02:22:23
because you thought you ate, but you rcmp
02:22:26
not the one hunting.
02:22:32
Okay.
02:22:33
Oh, I knew Colin.
02:22:34
You got a little smile all over your face, a little Gran.
02:22:38
Want to say anything about my party City poppers?
02:22:44
No. Absolutely not.
02:22:46
I don't want to say anything, but if I did, it would probably be
02:22:49
something like.
02:22:54
Sweet.
02:22:55
I dare you all to find one thing.
02:22:58
That's Kyle.
02:22:58
It's the Brady and show Brady and all.
02:23:01
Gary ends up of and so below because he's so close Brady.
02:23:07
And for sure we're doing it our way.
02:23:11
We're gonna make it make our dreams come true Brady
02:23:14
and John show it's Brady and draw.
02:23:17
It's their show. No Brady draw.
02:23:36
One the
02:23:40
mash up. They're back working.
02:23:41
That's good.
02:23:43
Or is it bad?
02:23:45
No way. I.
02:23:58
Know.
02:24:00
Yeah.
02:24:01
Let's get.
02:24:07
32 viewers.
02:24:08
It'd be nice if you could continue.
02:24:10
Two thumbs up. Like the video?
02:24:13
Thumbs down.
02:24:14
If you don't like the video.
02:24:20
Oh. Just don't do that.
02:24:27
Oh, shit.
02:24:28
You play heavy
02:24:31
now? I spent my time.
02:24:33
Cowbell
02:24:35
yesterday.
02:24:41
I. Got.
02:25:12
I remember Gary
02:25:13
saying something about one being the loneliest number in the, monologue.
02:25:17
So that came up.
02:25:18
I still don't have the ability to tell, transcribe the monologue
02:25:22
and turn it into a song during the show.
02:25:27
I have to record it separately or figure out a way
02:25:29
to get the transcription, but it's not there yet.
02:25:33
So we have this, Renaissance
02:25:35
redevelopment from 2024 showing the wonderful thing here,
02:25:40
the render of
02:25:40
towers 304 hundred being demolished as part of the 1.6
02:25:44
billion rightsizing plan proposed by Bedrock and General Motors.
02:25:50
But this is back in 90.
02:25:51
1994. No, 2024.
02:25:54
I hope that's what I said the first time.
02:25:58
Doesn't that look nice?
02:26:02
So what's the what's your what's the problem with it?
02:26:04
What's the what's his problem with it.
02:26:05
What's all the problem with it? I don't get the problem with it.
02:26:08
If they're going to tear down those things,
02:26:09
of course they have to close them.
02:26:10
Why is.
02:26:11
Why is everybody freaking out that it's closed before they demolish?
02:26:16
They're actually on schedule, even.
02:26:18
And you might be muted because I can't hear.
02:26:21
No I'm here.
02:26:22
All right.
02:26:24
You don't want to. You don't want to chat about it.
02:26:31
All right.
02:26:32
We'll move on to the next thing.
02:26:38
Move on to the next three.
02:26:40
Try to find
02:26:42
James O'Keefe.
02:26:43
You know him from,
02:26:47
Project Veritas. But then he got.
02:26:48
He kind of. They kind of kicked him out.
02:26:50
Now he's having problems with one of the board members from Project Veritas.
02:26:58
But the point I'm sharing this.
02:26:59
Oh, the thing is gone. See that?
02:27:01
Why is this?
02:27:02
I should have screenshotted it.
02:27:06
Fuck off.
02:27:08
He had mentioned that there's a cottage industry of people
02:27:11
that keep doing it in order to make money, which is my definition
02:27:14
of a cottage industry.
02:27:15
And now.
02:27:18
I got the thumbnail.
02:27:21
Maybe I can grab the thumbnail link.
02:27:28
All right.
02:27:28
I'll grab the thumbnail link.
02:27:29
I'll put it here.
02:27:31
I should be able to zoom in.
02:27:32
Yes, that worked okay.
02:27:39
Wait, this isn't where it said it.
02:27:41
Son of a bitch.
02:27:43
Go back to here.
02:27:49
Yeah, he updated it, so now I don't have the fucking post
02:27:51
anyway, he mentioned how a cottage industry was a bunch of people
02:27:56
trying to keep their bullshit sham going
02:27:59
so that they could keep making money.
02:28:03
Which is the absolute
02:28:06
definition. You.
02:28:23
All right.
02:28:23
The only link I have left besides one that didn't play with some kind of Clint
02:28:27
Eastwood saying the R-word,
02:28:30
but it's gone.
02:28:31
They took it down. Video Unavailable
02:28:35
I'm going to add a little built in thing where we can download the videos
02:28:38
locally from all this list so that we have them.
02:28:43
Yeah, that's what I'm going to have to do.
02:28:53
In July 2025, physicists at the National Institute
02:28:57
of Standards and Technology built the most accurate clock ever made.
02:29:01
It measures time to the 19th decimal place.
02:29:03
To put in perspective, the previous record was the 18 decimal place,
02:29:06
and that already felt like an absurd level of precision.
02:29:07
But here is the part that nobody talks about when they report the story.
02:29:10
The moment the clock became accurate enough to actually matter,
02:29:12
it revealed something uncomfortable the fundamental forces of nature,
02:29:14
the fixed numbers that hold all of physics together might not be fixed.
02:29:16
They might be drifting slowly, almost imperceptibly, but measurably so.
02:29:20
You build
02:29:20
the most precise instrument in history, and the first thing it tells you
02:29:23
is that the ground underneath physics is not as solid as you thought.
02:29:25
That is where we starting tonight.
02:29:26
Not with a theory, with the measurement and the result.
02:29:28
It doesn't add up. Before we go further, there's something we're sitting with.
02:29:31
What is a clock actually measuring?
02:29:32
Not how we know how pendulums, atomic oscillations, electron transitions,
02:29:36
but what when you've lost your watch, let's just call it God.
02:29:40
You assume it is.
02:29:40
Reading some property of the universe exists
02:29:41
independently of the watch itself, something called time,
02:29:44
something that flows, that passes but cannot be stopped, or this and that.
02:29:47
Something feels so obvious. It is an assumption at all.
02:29:49
But here's the thing
02:29:50
physics does not have a clean definition of time that is not circular.
02:29:52
Every formal definition either uses time to define time
02:29:54
or borrows from every experience.
02:29:56
In mathematics, you can call it absolute, flowing uniformly everywhere, independent
02:29:59
of anything except. Einstein dismantled that in 1905.
02:30:01
But Einstein is not definition.
02:30:03
It is a description of how time behaves in some conditions,
02:30:05
how it stretches, how it compresses, how it relates to space.
02:30:08
That is different from knowing what is.
02:30:09
Carlo Rovelli, one of the physicist
02:30:10
who has spent more time on this question than almost anyone alive? Particularly?
02:30:13
We know an enormous amount about how time behaves.
02:30:15
We do not know what it is.
02:30:16
Those are not the same thing.
02:30:17
And that gap between behavior and identity
02:30:18
is exactly where the experiment stopped using results that nobody expected.
02:30:21
So when that NIST folks suggested the concept might be drifting,
02:30:23
the unsettling part was not the drift itself.
02:30:25
It was a question nobody thought.
02:30:26
If the concepts are changing, what are they changing? With respect to?
02:30:28
What is the thing they are moving through?
02:30:30
And if that thing is time, what is time?
02:30:32
The first crack showed up in 1971 and was not subtle.
02:30:34
Joseph and Richard Keating, but it cesium atomic clocks
02:30:36
onto commercial passenger flights,
02:30:37
not specialized research aircraft, just regular planes
02:30:39
flew them around the world and compared them to identical clocks.
02:30:41
This time around, the clocks that flew came back different.
02:30:44
Not broken, not malfunctioning, just different.
02:30:46
They had measured a slightly different manner of time than the ones that say to.
02:30:48
The clocks lost about 59 nanoseconds relative to the ground clocks, measuring
02:30:51
almost exactly what Einstein's general and special relativity predicted.
02:30:53
Almost exactly.
02:30:54
There were small differences, which the experiment is noted carefully,
02:30:56
and which would be quite interesting to a handful of physicists ever since.
02:30:58
But the name is always clear. Time is not the same everywhere.
02:31:01
Move through space, accelerate, change position in a gravitational field,
02:31:04
and you move through time at a different rate than someone who stayed put.
02:31:06
This is not a metaphor.
02:31:07
This is not an approximation.
02:31:08
Two objects, same time point, same any point, different amounts of elapsed time.
02:31:12
And if you were the only person who finds a straightforward yes,
02:31:14
relativity, we know this. I want to ask you something.
02:31:16
Do you actually feel the weight of what that means?
02:31:18
Because what it means is that there is no single universal clock
02:31:20
ticking in the background of reality.
02:31:22
There's no mass of time.
02:31:23
Everyone says
02:31:23
there are only local clocks, local rates, local experiences, duration.
02:31:27
The universe does not have one timeline.
02:31:28
It has as many timelines. It has objects moving through it.
02:31:29
That was 1971.
02:31:31
Came up when you made a stranger.
02:31:32
Here is the part that makes this impossible to dismiss as abstract physics.
02:31:35
Your phone knows where you are right now
02:31:36
because of GPS satellites orbiting at about 20,000km altitude.
02:31:39
Those satellites carry atomic clocks and the clocks
02:31:41
because they aren't moving fast until high.
02:31:43
Earth's gravitational field run faster than clocks on the ground
02:31:45
by about 38 microseconds per day,
02:31:46
38 microseconds sounds like nothing less than a blink less
02:31:49
than anything quantum system can register.
02:31:50
A GPS works by calculating opposition from tiny differences in the arrival
02:31:53
times of signals from multiple satellites.
02:31:55
The math is exquisitely sensitive to timing.
02:31:56
If engineers don't correct that 38 microsecond data drift,
02:31:59
if they simply ignore the fact the time runs directly up and down here.
02:32:01
The position errors. What if you make it roughly 11km per day?
02:32:03
You won't be able to use as many hours, so every GPS device on Earth,
02:32:06
every time you ask your phone to ring,
02:32:07
someone is silently applying a direction to arrive.
02:32:09
In fact, the time is not uniform.
02:32:10
The engineers do not take the philosophy of time before building the system.
02:32:12
They do the calculation, apply the correction and it worked.
02:32:15
Which means the weirdness we're talking about is not theoretical.
02:32:17
Curiosity is all we seem. The issue of modern life.
02:32:19
The question is not whether time behaves this way.
02:32:20
We know it does.
02:32:21
The deep question
02:32:22
I want to keep showing up in every measurable is whether what we are
02:32:24
measuring when we measure time is actually time or something else.
02:32:26
We think in time because we do not have to wait for it,
02:32:28
something that should have been possible by 2021.
02:32:30
And in fact, most people never heard about it.
02:32:31
Say something about how poorly we communicate
02:32:32
the genuinely strange results in physics.
02:32:34
A team at Gillette,
02:32:34
Colorado, measure the difference in the flow of time
02:32:36
between two layers of atoms separated by one kilometer, not one kilometer,
02:32:39
not one meter, one millimeter the thickness of a credit card.
02:32:42
The difference was real. Measurable.
02:32:44
The atoms at the top of a sample experience
02:32:45
time, passing a fractionally faster rate than the atoms bottom.
02:32:47
Exactly as general relativity predicts,
02:32:48
objects are different heights in a gravitational field.
02:32:50
The precision required to detect this was 7.6 times ten to the power of -21.
02:32:53
Right now, as you read or listen to this, time is passing slightly faster
02:32:56
at the top of your head than your feet.
02:32:57
Your head is getting a different rate in your shoes.
02:32:59
The difference over human like time is too small to notice, but it is not zero.
02:33:02
It is a real physical, measured fact.
02:33:04
And here's where it's uncomfortable.
02:33:05
In a way, the GPS example does not quite capture.
02:33:07
The GPS tells us time runs directly different.
02:33:08
Excuse?
02:33:09
Fine, we accept it. But the JPL experiment
02:33:11
pushes in a territory that feels genuinely ridiculous.
02:33:13
It finds that sensitive that local the dependent on exact position.
02:33:15
Then what exactly is the thing we're measuring when we say time?
02:33:18
Is that one thing call time, or just the culture of local rates
02:33:20
that we bundle together into one name for convenience?
02:33:21
And if it's the latter, if time is a useful technical construct
02:33:23
on our immediate surroundings,
02:33:24
then what does it mean to say that the universe has a history?
02:33:26
What it means is that something happened before something else.
02:33:28
I find myself with no being up to that.
02:33:29
And the experiment the following question shorter, not easier.
02:33:32
Here is something that physics has known for 130 years
02:33:34
and has never quite figured out what to do with.
02:33:35
Take any equation that describes how the physical world behaves.
02:33:37
Newton's laws, Maxwell's equations, quantum mechanics, general relativity.
02:33:40
Run them forward in time. Now run them backward.
02:33:42
The mathematics works identically in both directions, not practically,
02:33:44
not with some corrections identically,
02:33:46
which means that nothing in the fundamental laws of physics
02:33:47
requires time to move the direction you experienced.
02:33:49
Moving the universe, as far as this equation is concerned, has no reference.
02:33:52
Forward and backward are the same thing.
02:33:53
Boltzmann saw this in 1895, and it nearly broke it.
02:33:55
He spent years trying to explain why we perceive a direction
02:33:57
past a future cause before effect.
02:33:59
Broken eggs never reassembling.
02:34:00
When the laws governing every particle in universe
02:34:01
do not contain that direction at all.
02:34:02
What he eventually concluded is that the arrow of time is not a law.
02:34:05
It is a statistical bias.
02:34:06
The other started an extremely ordered low entropy state from that starting point.
02:34:09
This all increases not because it has to,
02:34:10
but because there are overwhelmingly more disordered states than ordered ones,
02:34:13
and random processes tend toward the more probable.
02:34:15
That is the entire explanation for why time has a direction,
02:34:17
not fundamental law,
02:34:18
a statistical tendency which raises a question
02:34:19
Boltzmann never answered and nobody has answered since.
02:34:21
Why did the universe start in such an ordered state in the first place?
02:34:23
That initial condition, that improbably tidy beginning, is doing all the work.
02:34:27
Remove it and arrow time disappears entirely.
02:34:29
And to me, that is one of the most unsettling facts in all of science.
02:34:32
Everything experiences a passage of time, memory, aging, causality.
02:34:35
The sense of the past is fixed in the future is open.
02:34:36
All of it is downstream of one unexplained
02:34:38
coincidence, the beginning of everything.
02:34:39
So if the arrow of time comes from statistics
02:34:41
and not from the laws themselves, you might expect that the small scales
02:34:43
at the quantum level where individual particles
02:34:45
live time would already start to look symmetric.
02:34:47
And that expectation turns out to be correct in a way
02:34:48
that is harder to dismiss than most people realize.
02:34:50
Andrea, Rocco and Thomas go for University of Surrey.
02:34:52
We're looking at what physicists call open quantum systems,
02:34:54
quantum systems that interact with their environment,
02:34:56
which is basically everything real.
02:34:57
Since nothing in nature is perfectly isolated,
02:34:59
they want to understand why
02:34:59
time appears to flow forward in these systems,
02:35:01
even though the underlying equations are symmetric.
02:35:02
What happened in February 25th is that even tripling
02:35:04
standard simplifying assumptions, even after accounting
02:35:06
for the way energy in information dissipate into the environment,
02:35:08
the equations still behave the same way whether time moved forward or backward.
02:35:11
The mathematical take at the heart of the description
02:35:12
what they call the memory kernel, turned out to be symmetric.
02:35:15
In time, the arrow was not emerging from the physics of a system, it was simply
02:35:19
described as a surprise.
02:35:20
That is a careful word for physicist to use,
02:35:21
because it means the data went somewhere. The math was not expected to go.
02:35:23
What this tells us
02:35:24
is that the direction of time we experience is not being generated
02:35:26
by the quantum processes underneath the reality.
02:35:27
It is being generated by something sitting above the level of the equations,
02:35:30
and the obvious kind of the thing
02:35:31
that keeps showing up in results after results is the observer,
02:35:33
the thing doing the looking.
02:35:34
Which raises the question that feels way.
02:35:36
What was too strange to ask?
02:35:38
Seriously, what if the direction of time does not feature the obvious?
02:35:40
What if it is a feature of what it means to be aware? The universe?
02:35:42
What if it is?
02:35:43
The question whether the observer produces the arrow of time is not metaphysics,
02:35:46
it has a physical answer. And to get to it, we need understand something.
02:35:48
Rob Landauer proved at IBM in 1961.
02:35:50
He showed that erasing one
02:35:51
the information
02:35:51
resetting switch from 1 to 0, clearing a single memory
02:35:53
register necessarily releases a tiny amount into the environment,
02:35:56
not because of engineering inefficiency, not because computers weren't perfect,
02:35:58
but because the laws of thermodynamics requirement
02:36:00
information is physical manipulating energy.
02:36:02
The minimum cost scales, dropping the temperature, the environment
02:36:03
hotter, surroundings more expensive.
02:36:05
The erasure thinking is more sensitive to hot environment than cold.
02:36:07
One memory is not free,
02:36:08
and this connects to time in a way that took decades to fully appreciate.
02:36:10
If the arrow of times relate to entropy, my plan
02:36:13
is to watch every speed,
02:36:14
every act of recording information, and then we can talk about
02:36:16
the increased entropy.
02:36:17
Then observation is not passive window onto reality.
02:36:19
Observation is a thermodynamic event. It produces heat.
02:36:21
It generates irreversibility. It creates entropy.
02:36:24
And entropy is the only thing in physics distinguishes the past and the future.
02:36:26
So observation doesn't just register the arrow of time
02:36:28
it participates in producing.
02:36:29
It is that I find a model for what it means.
02:36:31
Every time you read something,
02:36:32
every time you store information up past, you are not just repeating time.
02:36:34
You are in a literal thermodynamic sense generating it.
02:36:36
Which raises a question that deserves more attention than it usually gets.
02:36:39
If memory creates the arrow of time and the arrow of time
02:36:41
is what makes the past differ from the future, then what came first?
02:36:43
The time produce memory or the memory produce time?
02:36:45
In November 2045, a Team Oxford tested exactly how far that logic goes.
02:36:48
The result would be
02:36:49
the log thing is one of those things that takes a moment to fully land,
02:36:51
and I think most people who encounter it move past it too quickly.
02:36:53
They built a microscopic clock,
02:36:54
a double quantum dot, two tiny regions that a single electron can jump between.
02:36:58
Each jump is a tick.
02:36:59
The clock works.
02:37:00
It keeps time in this minimal sense possible.
02:37:01
Then they also question the sounds on almost two basic
02:37:03
how much energy does it cost around the clock
02:37:04
compared to how much it cost to read it, observe it to detect
02:37:06
it takes to turn quantum events into a record.
02:37:08
The answer is not what anyone expected.
02:37:10
Reading the clock required for a billion times more energy than running it.
02:37:12
Not twice as much, not ten times a billion.
02:37:14
And when they analyzed where all that energy was going,
02:37:16
they found it was producing entropy.
02:37:17
The measurement was generating irreversibility.
02:37:19
It was creating the thermodynamic conditions
02:37:20
that make one direction of time distinguishable from the other.
02:37:22
When the two quantum dots
02:37:23
reach the same temperature, when the system was perfectly balanced,
02:37:25
the electrons jump forward and backward with equal probability.
02:37:27
It's like a new direction.
02:37:28
It was equal past and future time in that state.
02:37:30
I know how the arrow appeared
02:37:32
only when the measurement operators recorded the jumps.
02:37:33
Only when something outside the quantum system built a memory of what happened.
02:37:36
The direction of time in this experiment was not a property of the clock.
02:37:38
It was a property of the act of looking at the clock.
02:37:40
So here is the question I can't get out of my head after sitting with this result.
02:37:43
If you remove every observer in the universe,
02:37:44
every device, every memory, every record of any event
02:37:46
with time to have a direction, the experiment is not to them.
02:37:48
But it is impossible to say yes with any confidence.
02:37:50
The mechanism to he say what time still have an erection died
02:37:53
after the government is way the strangest. It is whistling
02:37:57
well because
02:37:59
this these experiments that we're going to see are going
02:38:02
to actually exhibit that they probably wouldn't.
02:38:05
It's the observer.
02:38:06
Observer in every case.
02:38:09
Which leads me to believe that as soon as we die
02:38:11
and we're not observing anymore, our reality
02:38:13
that we're used to probably doesn't exist.
02:38:15
Time doesn't exist.
02:38:17
And at that exact moment where you cease to be aware
02:38:20
or sensory aware with this body,
02:38:24
some crazy shit is possible.
02:38:27
That's as far as I'll say right now.
02:38:29
What if that's what the timeline is?
02:38:32
There is no timeline.
02:38:34
Each individual perspective is the timeline. The.
02:38:37
So if you want to get to that point, though, you have a different
02:38:40
you are living a different timeline than me because you fly in planes
02:38:43
because you're taller than me, because you live
02:38:46
in a higher altitude or lower altitude than me.
02:38:49
Your timeline is different than mine.
02:38:51
It's not like it's not even like some weird quantum
02:38:54
science fiction Marvel comic book thing.
02:38:57
He even started
02:38:58
it with your head is in a different time speed.
02:39:01
So when they say time, though, we're just agreeing on what time is.
02:39:05
It's an interval between blah blah blah.
02:39:07
But it gets way weirder down to look at carefully.
02:39:10
The electron sits between two quantum dots.
02:39:11
It can jump left or right at a quantum level without any motion happening.
02:39:14
These days I'm talking about a kind of quantum
02:39:16
in which forward and backward are indistinguishable.
02:39:18
There is no tape, there's just a motion.
02:39:19
Now the apparatus turns on it, record
02:39:21
it, built a sequence left, right, left, left, right.
02:39:24
And that sequence has the direction it has before and after.
02:39:26
It has a past and a future.
02:39:27
The arrow of time appears the moment, the pauses.
02:39:29
And here's a halt. It should give you pause.
02:39:30
The arrow is in the record, not an electron.
02:39:32
The electron does not know it is being observed.
02:39:34
It does not change its behavior because of the measurement,
02:39:35
but the entropy, the irreversibility, the thing that makes us different
02:39:38
for future is generated entirely in the measurement apparatus.
02:39:40
In the act of writing the result down.
02:39:41
Which means that if you imagine a universe with no records, no memories,
02:39:44
no structures that retain information about previous states,
02:39:46
that universe would have electrons going back and forth, energy
02:39:48
moving around, things happening, but no arrow of time, no past, no future.
02:39:52
Just an eternal symmetric present. That's not science fiction.
02:39:54
That is what the Oxford invention implies.
02:39:55
And I can extrapolate something John will argue for decades.
02:39:57
The information is not just a distortion, a physical reality
02:39:59
that has deepest level.
02:40:00
The universe is not matter and energy, but bits, records, questions answered.
02:40:04
If that's right, then time itself is a record, a memory.
02:40:06
The universe keeps itself.
02:40:07
And the question what is doing?
02:40:08
The remembering does not have a clean not to get it.
02:40:09
The arrow of time is in the record rather than in the physics.
02:40:11
The next question arrives almost on its own.
02:40:13
What does quantum mechanics actually say?
02:40:14
Our time to begin with,
02:40:15
and the answer is stranger than most people realize,
02:40:16
because quantum mechanics barely says anything outside it,
02:40:18
posing some real area physics time space that we did as part.
02:40:22
What is he posting for next week or for right now?
02:40:26
No, I just reposted this because this is this is I want to make
02:40:29
I want to make sure it makes it into the next week's video.
02:40:33
General relativity weaves them into spacetime, I think, over his lens.
02:40:35
And he's watching quantum mechanics. That partnership does not exist.
02:40:38
Space is unobservable. You can measure position.
02:40:40
You can put position in the equation of something.
02:40:41
The system itself possesses time is not an observable.
02:40:44
It is a parameter, a number.
02:40:45
You've eaten the equation from outside
02:40:46
looks like a dial before you run the internet.
02:40:47
The Schrodinger equation of free time is something
02:40:48
that simply flows in a background, uniform and external, untouched by anything
02:40:52
the quantum system does, which is almost exactly what was said
02:40:53
in 1687,
02:40:54
after the time flowing equally independent of anything external quantum mechanics,
02:40:58
for all its strangeness,
02:40:59
something called Newton's time back in through the back door.
02:41:01
John von Neumann formalized this in 1932.
02:41:03
Time in quantum panics is not an operator.
02:41:04
It is a gift, which means that every quantum increment
02:41:06
ever won, every result we have, every prediction we've tested.
02:41:10
You're watching this entire thing.
02:41:13
You got something out?
02:41:14
I'm out. Yeah.
02:41:18
All right, I forgot.
02:41:19
I was not sure about this one, but this one's good anyway.
02:41:24
Tina. Thank you.
02:41:25
Developing tonight, a gruesome find during a children's Easter egg hunts.
02:41:30
Wolf thinks holiday outing took a chilling turn
02:41:32
when a human skull was discovered at this park in Long Beach.
02:41:37
That's a word.
02:41:37
Eleven's Hayley Winslow has more story.
02:41:40
Definitely can see a skull along a Long Beach Park
02:41:43
trail, beneath a tent and beside an open cardboard box.
02:41:46
The L.A.
02:41:47
County Medical in the kids defense, though,
02:41:48
it was painted like an Easter egg, a skull.
02:41:51
While one rescuer carefully cradles the mandible, the community shocked.
02:41:56
I hope that, like I said, I hope
02:41:59
it's nobody young, at least.
02:42:01
Hopefully I know everybody.
02:42:02
Life matters.
02:42:03
But if it's no little girl, a little boy.
02:42:06
The team worked through the night to uncover the remains
02:42:08
that Long Beach PD confirms is a human skull of a child.
02:42:15
I'm sorry.
02:42:15
The kids in the back over here, her Easter egg.
02:42:17
They got it right out in the open.
02:42:19
They say it was discovered during a children's
02:42:21
Easter egg hunt organized by the community on Sunday evening.
02:42:24
The quickly turned into quite a disturbing crime scene
02:42:28
when a family hunting for plastic eggs found this interesting.
02:42:32
Very interesting.
02:42:33
DeForest Wetlands Park, a popular place for locals.
02:42:35
They have to be declared the winner and four years also.
02:42:39
It's just crazy.
02:42:39
And I had to make sure today that we.
02:42:41
So I packed it tonight.
02:42:42
The park reopened Monday.
02:42:45
Broken egg shells and confetti still scattered throughout the trail.
02:42:49
Mystery it.
02:42:50
It started missing throughout this whole ruby.
02:42:52
Now the medical examiner is working to determine exactly
02:42:55
who these remains belong to and how they ended up here.
02:42:59
I know pretty much for a lot of the guys who come through,
02:43:01
you know, saying and is pretty harmless, you know what I'm saying?
02:43:04
For for the most part,
02:43:05
we haven't had too many weirdos up in here, in and around here.
02:43:09
Evidence of that Easter egg hunt still left behind here at the park.
02:43:12
The medical examiner just put out a statement saying the
02:43:15
team has taken the human remains
02:43:17
to the Forensic Science Center for further investigation.
02:43:20
So still a lot more questions than answers right now.
02:43:25
Reporting in Long Beach I'm Hailey Winslow, Fox 11 news.
02:43:29
All right Haley.
02:43:35
Yeah. So.
02:43:39
No one knows what the complex is worth.
02:43:41
So why are GM and Dan Gilbert coming to the public for 350 million?
02:43:46
This is Charlie with us.
02:43:48
I bought myself a single share of German motor stock back in December.
02:43:51
So far, I've lost 9% on the deal.
02:43:52
I consider one of the best investments I've ever made that year.
02:43:55
Gives me voting rights and legal standing within with within the company.
02:43:59
If this rancid
02:44:01
Renaissance Center deal gets done, I'm going to sue the shit out of GM.
02:44:04
In Detroit.
02:44:05
You see a lot of half baked development deals,
02:44:06
but this one is so bizarre it defies financial sanity.
02:44:10
As a shareholder, GM has a responsibility to maximize my fans.
02:44:15
Again, this project, the little we know about it, can't possibly do that.
02:44:19
Developer Dan Gilbert and GM have come to the public asking help
02:44:22
with their $1.6 billion scheme to redevelop Brunson's five towers, along
02:44:27
with along the Detroit River, Gilbert would bring 1 billion into the deal.
02:44:30
GM would toss in another 250 million,
02:44:32
and the city and state would chip in 275 million.
02:44:36
GM, which owns the building, says its role in the project would be simply
02:44:38
a philanthropic one if the redevelopment ever made a profit.
02:44:42
The company claims it would donate the money to charity.
02:44:45
That is, according to Dave Marsden, GM's vice
02:44:48
president of infrastructure and corporate citizenship.
02:44:52
But I don't trust mass around as far as I can throw them.
02:44:54
Just asked the five.
02:44:56
Just ask the people of Flint.
02:44:57
He's one of the main culprits who pushed the deadly water deal in vehicle City.
02:45:02
Profits are supposed to be maximized and just be distributed to shareholders.
02:45:05
That is called fiduciary responsibility.
02:45:07
According to the in the document, demolition business.
02:45:11
According to people in the demolition business, the potential cost to demolish
02:45:14
all five towers would be no more than 50 million, which includes asbestos
02:45:18
remedy, remediation, whatever those.
02:45:21
But let's not quibble.
02:45:22
Let's say the demo would cost because it'd be 100 million.
02:45:25
Still, a 100 million taxpayer loss would be better than the proposed 275
02:45:29
million loss.
02:45:30
So how much is the Renaissance Center worth?
02:45:32
As is, we now have comparable price.
02:45:36
Tower 600 recently sold for 9.2 million.
02:45:39
And an online auction.
02:45:40
Weirdly, we still don't know who bought it,
02:45:43
but applying the same cost per square foot to the five towers
02:45:46
GM owns, their value would come in somewhere around 150 million.
02:45:50
But that's not a quibble.
02:45:51
Let's say the price would be around 50 million again, 5050 million profit for GM
02:45:56
and the other tower owners would be better than 275 million loss 50 million.
02:46:02
Ahmad al-Hadi would be better than
02:46:05
and leader of Stockbridge Enterprises,
02:46:08
purchased tower 600 for 9.9 million.
02:46:11
Okay, so it's simple, simple math, a simple enough sell it or demolish it.
02:46:16
Smoke filled back rooms one can't help but suspect
02:46:19
the ultimate purpose of this backroom deal is to further enrich Dan Gilbert,
02:46:22
one of the one of America's richest people.
02:46:24
Gilbert currently built, is currently building the Hudson's,
02:46:27
Detroit, a Chevy taxpayer funded skyscraper
02:46:31
that is in its eighth year of construction.
02:46:33
But Gilbert can't find tenants.
02:46:35
His main competition is the Renaissance Center,
02:46:37
which contains more than half the city's vacant office space.
02:46:40
Get the taxpayers to take those towers down.
02:46:42
Gilbert's problems are solved.
02:46:44
The city looks better since bankruptcy.
02:46:47
How could it, how could it not?
02:46:48
But at what cost?
02:46:49
And who's this is one of one.
02:46:51
This is where one measly share of GM comes in.
02:46:55
The citizens of Motor City got to pick pocket, got pickpocketed over the decade,
02:47:00
over the decades by the financial felonious felonies
02:47:05
who eventually plummeted floating
02:47:07
its insolvency with the highest property taxes in the country
02:47:11
and the only city income tax and utility tax in the state.
02:47:15
Detroiters have no more to give.
02:47:17
So now the blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
02:47:20
blah blah, so
02:47:26
the cable turning.
02:47:29
It is they who paid for Detroit's pensions over the past decade and Flint's
02:47:33
water, Gilbert's failed shoreline, GM's EV bonding boondoggles,
02:47:38
the Detroit Institute of Arts, the Detroit Zoo, the smart bus system.
02:47:41
Now comes an increased fees
02:47:42
for hunting license drivers, even like blah blah blah blah.
02:47:45
It's all a license to steal.
02:47:48
I've got one crazy idea.
02:47:49
Let's try capitalism on the Renaissance redo.
02:47:52
Otherwise I'll see you in court.
02:47:54
And then this come comes with this little
02:47:57
video
02:47:59
attached. You.
02:48:04
Whammo!
02:48:09
Time and Dan Gilbert's got his hand out again.
02:48:13
He wants another 250
02:48:16
or $350 million from the Michigan taxpayer
02:48:20
for his latest scheme to redo the Renaissance Center.
02:48:24
But can we trust Diamond Dan?
02:48:26
Is this idea even worth it?
02:48:28
Let's compare.
02:48:30
It took one year, one month,
02:48:32
and two weeks to build the entire Empire State Building
02:48:36
with private money in the middle of the Great Depression.
02:48:41
It took three years
02:48:43
and eight months to build the entire Renaissance Center,
02:48:47
all with private money and in the middle of the 70s oil embargo.
02:48:53
It's taken seven years so far
02:48:55
for Diamond Dan to build this, the Hudson's Tower in downtown Detroit
02:49:00
and Erector Set with no opening date in sight.
02:49:04
Normally you'd go bankrupt, taking a decade to build a skyscraper.
02:49:08
But not Diamond Dan.
02:49:10
Not when the public hands you $200 million in cash, prizes and property.
02:49:16
And it's not even as tall as he said it was going to be.
02:49:20
Yeah, it
02:49:21
is a little shorter, and I got my own taxes to pay.
02:49:25
You should try it sometime.
02:49:27
It's called capitalism.
02:49:33
Yep. So just as much horseshit.
02:49:47
Jujitsu.
02:49:50
That was, letters and comments
02:49:52
emailed to Doctor Muhammad al-Hadi.
02:49:57
I like him, he's a good dude.
02:49:59
I don't know who he is, actually.
02:50:00
Actually, I say Muhammad, but it's Muhammad.
02:50:04
My Mahmud.
02:50:07
Almost evil, sinister so much.
02:50:10
Mahmoud.
02:50:11
Mahmoud al-Hadi.
02:50:14
Yeah. Okay.
02:50:15
Well, a very, very heavy, heavy battalion tonight.
02:50:20
So to you, we had a very there's Derrickson but let's go ahead.
02:50:24
Terrorist chasing those who had the pet were much harmed.
02:50:30
Oh I did my move
02:50:34
mood I think I got it.
02:50:36
It's doctor my daddy
02:50:40
Muhammad Ali. How did he.
02:50:43
Just rolls right off the tongue.
02:50:44
It's beautiful.
02:50:45
It's a gorgeous name.
02:50:55
This is a carry requested Masha.
02:50:59
It's the last thing that I haven't done.
02:51:04
Yeah.
02:51:04
One more thing.
02:51:05
I don't think it worked out very well.
02:51:11
One more.
02:51:14
There is a new Bigfoot movie coming out about the actual
02:51:18
walking photo of Bigfoot and the hoax and the walking Bigfoot.
02:51:22
Yes, I kind of want to see it.
02:51:25
That's fun. Well,
02:51:27
that's actually pretty cool right there.
02:51:31
Bigfoot for you
02:51:34
or one.
02:51:37
People.
02:51:39
I'm still after those.
02:51:40
I'm still going to get through my whole hour time video.
02:51:44
It's incredible.
02:51:45
And we won't go through it next week,
02:51:48
but we can talk about it. Yes.
02:51:56
I'll say it's only 1:00.
02:51:57
It's going on.
02:52:00
1:00 eastern.
02:52:02
It's 1:00 eastern. No, your children.
02:52:06
For the first time ever since I said it,
02:52:08
I'm actually playing a music video on the hour.
02:52:12
But that, like, four weeks ago, I can't forget the three,
02:52:15
three, three strategy either.
02:52:20
You think I'm the only one that comes
02:52:21
with only three videos of me?
02:52:43
One second.
02:52:44
No, no.
02:52:47
Quite literally.
02:52:49
Don't talk. My.
02:53:06
Mom, I want to get.
02:53:16
You. Yeah.
02:53:25
Was connected inside a framework where time is assumed rather than derived.
02:53:27
We've never measure time from inside quantum systems.
02:53:29
We have only ever measured quantum systems from inside time.
02:53:31
Whether those are the same thing is a question tends to matter enormously.
02:53:33
And in 2020, a team in Vienna decided to stop treating it
02:53:35
as a theoretical problem and actually put it in a library.
02:53:38
What university team in Vienna was testing?
02:53:39
Sounds like it belongs in philosophy seminar rather than a physics lab.
02:53:42
They want to know whether the sequence of events in a quantum system,
02:53:44
they always comes before B.
02:53:45
If A equals is B, did you say you recognize a video?
02:53:47
Causality is absolute.
02:53:48
The order of events is written into a structure of reality.
02:53:50
What they found is that this is not how quantum systems work.
02:53:52
They set up a situation
02:53:53
where a quantum particle passes through two operations for them, A and B,
02:53:56
and the order in which you experiences them is in quantum superposition,
02:53:58
not randomly one or the other, both simultaneously
02:54:00
before b and b before a at the same time.
02:54:02
In the same experiment with the same particle.
02:54:04
And this was not a theoretical result, it was measured.
02:54:05
The experiment outcomes could only be explained.
02:54:07
A causal order was genuinely indefinite, not unknown, not random, but superposed.
02:54:11
So here is what that actually means.
02:54:12
Causality the principle that causes precede effects,
02:54:15
but the past shapes the future and not the other way around,
02:54:17
is not a fundamental feature of quantum reality.
02:54:18
It is something that emerges at large scales,
02:54:20
the way temperature emerges from the motion of molecules
02:54:22
underneath it at the quantum level, before and after an optics.
02:54:25
The universe does not have a building before,
02:54:27
it has it before only when something forces the order
02:54:28
to become definite,
02:54:29
which, if you have been following the thread
02:54:31
from Boltzmann through Landauer, through the experiments, sounds familiar.
02:54:33
The order time, like the division of time, seems to need something to fix it,
02:54:36
and that's something he's pointing back toward the same place.
02:54:38
To what?
02:54:38
The observer, to what the record, to what whatever is doing the measuring,
02:54:41
whether that is a satisfying answer or beginning of a much deeper
02:54:42
problem is something I genuinely do not know.
02:54:44
So we have two theories general relativity and quantum mechanics.
02:54:47
Between them, they account for essentially everything
02:54:48
we consider in the physical universe
02:54:49
every particle, every force, every structure from atoms of galaxy
02:54:51
clusters, both of them tested to extraordinary precision. Both work.
02:54:54
And yet when you sit them down next to each other
02:54:55
and look at what they say about time, they contradict each other
02:54:57
so completely that they cannot be right about what time fundamentally is.
02:55:00
In general relativity, time is dynamic.
02:55:02
It is a dimension of space time.
02:55:03
A real physical thing occurs in response to mass and energy.
02:55:05
The stretches near massive objects that is woven into the geometry of the US.
02:55:08
It is not a background, it is a participant in quantum mechanics.
02:55:11
Time is a fixed external parameter. It is not curve.
02:55:13
It is not respond to the quantum system.
02:55:15
It just flows in the background,
02:55:16
providing the stage on which quantum patterns occur.
02:55:17
It cannot be measured from inside the system.
02:55:19
It cannot be put into superposition.
02:55:20
It is in the quantum framework, essentially Newtonian.
02:55:22
These equations are not this difference. They are strictly incompatible.
02:55:25
General relativity any time to be a dynamic display.
02:55:27
Quantum mechanics any time to be an inert external given
02:55:29
you cannot have some things like.
02:55:30
Which means one of the two most successful theories in history of science
02:55:32
has an incomplete picture of something as basic as time.
02:55:34
And here is what bothers me about how this is usually discussed.
02:55:36
We talk about it as a technical problem waiting for technical solution.
02:55:38
But why the incompatibility? It is not a gap to be filled.
02:55:40
What if it is telling us something about the nature of time
02:55:42
that neither theory has the vocabulary to say directly?
02:55:43
In 1967, one calculation tried to follow that logic.
02:55:46
Neither one has even the vocabulary.
02:55:48
That's how wrong science could be.
02:55:50
It would end.
02:55:51
The answer was not what anyone was hoping for, John.
02:55:53
We learned right away we're not trying to do something exotic.
02:55:55
They were trying to do the obvious thing
02:55:56
right down to quantum mechanics, the universe as a whole.
02:55:58
Not the quantum mechanics of a particle or an atom.
02:55:59
The universe, or that system of emptiness.
02:56:02
You immediately run into technical problem, general relativity.
02:56:04
Describe how the geometry of space time evolves over time.
02:56:06
Quantum mechanics describes how quantum states of everything else combine them.
02:56:09
You need a single equation handled both.
02:56:10
When we learned DeWitt equation in 1967, time disappeared.
02:56:13
Not proximately, not in some limiting case.
02:56:15
The time variable.
02:56:16
The T that appears in the equation in physics
02:56:17
was simply absent from the final result.
02:56:19
The universe as a whole, described by the most complete equation
02:56:20
physicists to construct, does not have all the time, it just is static.
02:56:24
Time is a single quantum state with no before and no after.
02:56:26
This is called the Wheeler DeWitt equation.
02:56:28
Hold on. It just is with no before.
02:56:30
No after.
02:56:33
It sounds
02:56:33
like the Bible's description of God
02:56:37
doesn't. Doesn't it sounds familiar?
02:56:39
It sounds so familiar to me.
02:56:41
I'm not saying that's what it is.
02:56:42
I'm just suggesting that it may have some connection to some type of reveal of
02:56:47
what that is.
02:56:48
It gets way closer and deeper to what I think it might be,
02:56:51
and it is not a fringe result.
02:56:53
It is.
02:56:53
Did you see you have any more videos or no,
02:56:57
I keep telling you I was wrong.
02:57:00
Oh, you have a song, why would you want to play it?
02:57:03
Or do you want to watch more of this?
02:57:05
We go out on the song.
02:57:06
I did also have this really quick to.
02:57:09
What do you think of this statement?
02:57:13
I can't read it, I can't read it.
02:57:14
It says la PD officers arrest a protester dressed as the Statue of Liberty
02:57:18
during the No Kings protest.
02:57:20
They're not they
02:57:21
there may not be a stronger image
02:57:22
right now that the capture what is happening in the United States.
02:57:27
Oh, I got a lot to say about that.
02:57:29
And she's cuffed behind.
02:57:30
She means nothing about rights and liberty in the United States.
02:57:33
That is a Luciferian satanic devil God, whatever
02:57:39
that we we've done stuff about it on the show.
02:57:42
We could definitely do more.
02:57:45
I have no problems with that.
02:57:46
And she's not Lady Liberty either.
02:57:48
That's I think the stupid people
02:57:49
that are commenting on this meme think that she's Lady Liberty.
02:57:52
That's a scale and a fucking justice thing.
02:57:54
Totally different. This woman has.
02:57:57
I forgot what they all are.
02:57:58
The seven deadly sins are this for each spike on her helmet,
02:58:02
she's got the torch.
02:58:04
Is the torch a bail bill or some shit like that?
02:58:08
It's a horrific story.
02:58:09
There's nothing good about it. It.
02:58:12
Yeah, way worse than that.
02:58:13
The plaque that they put on it. Give us your huddled masses. Dirty poor.
02:58:16
Yeah. Horny.
02:58:17
Whatever it is, you're horny. Masses horny.
02:58:20
That was added there like 100 years ago.
02:58:22
Not many fagots that was I don't know, I don't know, I should have said 100 years.
02:58:26
I have no, no idea when it was added, but it was added long after we got
02:58:30
the statue itself.
02:58:32
So it was the message was co-opted, hidden.
02:58:38
Fuck that.
02:58:39
What was worse is when they they arrested a little cartoon
02:58:42
character like a mascot, a furry, a bird, and that that looked bad.
02:58:48
It's like one side, like you're taking people's liberty
02:58:50
and the other side's like, no, you're taking people's liberty.
02:58:56
Right.
02:58:57
But I, I guess, I mean, her boobs are a little saggy.
02:59:01
That's the second thing I letting a bunch of people
02:59:04
who came into the country unjustly and not through the system
02:59:08
that it's systems that are provided
02:59:11
that becomes against the law.
02:59:16
And allowing don't don't make reasonable sense to to the virtuous.
02:59:19
Do not make reasonable sense same time.
02:59:24
Telling other people what they can and can't do
02:59:27
kicking them out of our country is who's doing that.
02:59:30
No, we're not telling them what they can't do.
02:59:33
We're telling them what they can do.
02:59:35
Self-Deport or risk this.
02:59:39
Yeah,
02:59:41
they got money to like, do that shit to.
02:59:43
And then they are they provide like means of for them to like get back in.
02:59:48
You know, they're like hey like you got a pit stop out of here
02:59:51
for a little while, but like, we're marking you down as, like, priority.
02:59:55
We'll we'll get you back in if you're not. Yeah.
02:59:57
But every everybody does that about everything.
03:00:00
Well, everybody's a fuckface is the problem.
03:00:03
I don't like that.
03:00:04
They had a no Kings protest that the only country that
03:00:08
literally exists because we revolted against the king, right.
03:00:13
I said that to somebody who supports it.
03:00:14
And they said, well, no,
03:00:15
they're protesting the fact that Trump thinks he wants to be a king.
03:00:21
And Jesus is king.
03:00:25
And then they're against the Iran war, even though the ironies are essentially
03:00:29
trying to king their way around their fucking house over there.
03:00:34
I don't know anything about that. I'm not there.
03:00:36
I only know what I hear, and I hear fucking bullshit.
03:00:39
Usually.
03:00:40
Yeah.
03:00:41
It's not a it's not a great place to live.
03:00:44
It's not a great.
03:00:44
How do you know to live under might be a great place to work.
03:00:47
I'm sure it's beautiful. Yeah.
03:00:50
It's great.
03:00:53
I ran in the summer.
03:00:56
I was doing that.
03:00:57
I actually felt retarded.
03:00:59
Like really retarded day. In a weird way.
03:01:02
I had to sort of just free myself up to believe
03:01:05
that it was okay to be stupid or dumb, to be more out.
03:01:09
Yeah, to be more radical. Exactly.
03:01:11
To be a moron.
03:01:12
An imbecile. Yeah.
03:01:14
Not the dumbest motherfucker that ever lived.
03:01:17
When I was playing the character.
03:01:18
When he was a character. Yeah.
03:01:19
I mean, as fully flat, stupid
03:01:22
ass like, by the end of the whole thing, I was like, wait a minute.
03:01:25
You know, I flushed so much out.
03:01:27
How am I going to jump started?
03:01:29
I think it's just like, yeah, yeah, right.
03:01:32
Use farting in bathtubs.
03:01:33
Laughing. Yeah.
03:01:33
So yeah, I mean, it was just really quite a it was crazy.
03:01:37
Is that working with Mercury is how science man is art form.
03:01:41
Yeah.
03:01:41
You notice that's what we do, right?
03:01:44
Yeah, yeah.
03:01:45
Hats off a goalie special.
03:01:46
No, nothing.
03:01:47
Academy is about issue.
03:01:51
With about what
03:01:55
is serious, you know.
03:01:56
No fucking the long one.
03:01:58
Everybody knows you never got to cut it.
03:02:02
What do you mean? That's okay.
03:02:03
Check it out.
03:02:04
Dustin Hoffman.
03:02:05
Ray man like took get guitar.
03:02:10
What do you think of this pizza?
03:02:11
This is Gary sent this.
03:02:12
I think he thinks it's, like, a good thing.
03:02:14
I think it makes me hungry.
03:02:16
Well,
03:02:18
well, is it sardines?
03:02:20
Gary? Are they mushrooms? Because I can't tell.
03:02:22
And that changes the whole. Those.
03:02:25
That's not pizza.
03:02:27
It's got yellow cheese on it.
03:02:28
So you probably coated it with cheddar which is anti Italian.
03:02:32
Why is it like oval.
03:02:34
Like there's these like triangle pieces and then also square piece pieces.
03:02:38
Oh I was, I yeah I was getting to that.
03:02:40
I mean cut your pizza.
03:02:41
Cut your the other half isn't even cut.
03:02:44
He's like saving that because he's putting it away.
03:02:48
But he did.
03:02:48
So he did make a he did make a square round pizza.
03:02:52
So I guess he did cut it right.
03:02:56
I don't mind that now that I think about it.
03:02:57
I don't mind that because you get the triangle piece
03:02:59
and you get this fucking square rectangle piece.
03:03:02
I just have a problem with the thick pepperoni.
03:03:04
You almost cooked the pepperoni enough.
03:03:06
They were just about to char and then you stopped it.
03:03:09
I don't understand why there's one on the top that's cooked the right way.
03:03:12
Right there.
03:03:14
The rest are undercooked.
03:03:17
There's such a thing.
03:03:22
I'm. No, no, no.
03:03:29
Oh. All right.
03:03:32
I got, like, 50 minutes. I'm going back to this.
03:03:34
The starting point for every serious attempt
03:03:36
at quantum gravity, and what it says with complete
03:03:37
mathematical clarity is a time is not a fundamental feature of universe.
03:03:40
It is something that has to emerge somehow from a timeless underlying reality.
03:03:43
The question is just, how do you give me the link?
03:03:45
Because it has not.
03:03:46
There were several songs, and then there was it done.
03:03:48
But in 2013, one team decided
03:03:50
to stop playing the candidates and test one of them in a library.
03:03:52
What they found is one of those quietly unsettling,
03:03:54
and it almost never comes up outside. Special exceptions.
03:03:56
The experiment between America and colleagues
03:03:58
built was designed to test an Idea patent, which is proposed back in 1983.
03:04:01
The idea is called the relational interpretation of time,
03:04:03
and it works like this.
03:04:04
If the universe as a whole has no time, as the equation says,
03:04:06
then times arise when the relationship between the universe,
03:04:08
specifically between a clock and observer a clock to test
03:04:11
this team created a simple quantum system two entangled photons.
03:04:14
One acted as the clock, the other acted as the observer.
03:04:17
Then they look at the system in two different ways.
03:04:18
First, from the outside, I don't like the two videos a single day.
03:04:21
I measuring it from about perspective.
03:04:24
The system appeared static. Timeless.
03:04:25
No revolution, no change, no before or after exactly what the equation predicts.
03:04:29
Then they look for the inside using one for countermeasure,
03:04:31
the other letting the internal observer track the internal clock.
03:04:33
From this perspective, time existed.
03:04:35
The clock ticked.
03:04:36
Events are sequence
03:04:36
the internals of experiment, time passing, same system, same physical setup
03:04:40
to complete differ reality depending on where you stood.
03:04:42
If you're outside at the end of time, insight is important.
03:04:44
Two distinct different realities.
03:04:48
To me, that alone could be
03:04:50
this a poor attempt at describing
03:04:55
and as above, so below, or a heaven and earth kind of a thing.
03:04:59
What this means is almost to launch, to hold in one thought.
03:05:01
Time may not be a property of the universe.
03:05:02
It may be a property of being inside universe.
03:05:03
It may be what it feels like to be part of something rather than an observer. All.
03:05:06
If that's true, then every question we thought we knew.
03:05:08
So it's fucking the universe.
03:05:09
It's inside the universe.
03:05:11
You have to ask about the beginning of time,
03:05:12
the end of time, the direction of time.
03:05:14
All of them need to be reframed entirely.
03:05:15
Not because the questions are wrong,
03:05:16
because the thing they ask asking about is not where we thought was what the more
03:05:19
the experiment actually implies is something most some reason miss.
03:05:21
If you are science system, you experience time.
03:05:23
If you're outside, you do not.
03:05:24
And you know I definitely there is no position you can occupy
03:05:27
that is not inside it.
03:05:28
Which means the time, the description, the liquid equation,
03:05:30
the static quantum state, the universe we know before and after is a description
03:05:33
from a perspective that physically cannot exist.
03:05:35
No. See, that's huge for my whole concept of what I think I believe in.
03:05:40
If you're not in the system,
03:05:42
then you're not withholding by the system's physical rules
03:05:46
that is an epiphany.
03:05:49
That's a revelation for me.
03:05:51
And I'm I mean, I might be wrong.
03:05:52
This is for my own personal opinion and belief.
03:05:55
That isn't proof, but it's he literally just said, if you're not inside of it,
03:06:00
if you're not observing it, if you're not a part of it,
03:06:02
for example, like when your energy changes when you die.
03:06:05
I know that's a stretch.
03:06:06
It seems fantastically ridiculous, but it gets even worse
03:06:09
if you think that there's nothing that I can a that the only option,
03:06:13
any real access is the internal one, the one where time exists.
03:06:16
And here's where it gets more specific and more unsettling.
03:06:17
The just saying time is an illusion.
03:06:19
Let's see. Wait.
03:06:20
I'm sorry, I have to keep talking, interrupting, and making transformative.
03:06:22
Our whole argument for 150 shows basically is is there anything after life?
03:06:27
But if you take out the after part
03:06:29
and say it doesn't matter if it's before or after or during,
03:06:32
when the existence of observing life ends, something dramatically changes.
03:06:38
There's a truth to that.
03:06:39
Whether it just turns to blackness or it turns to something that you're.
03:06:48
A part of everything.
03:06:50
It's not mean. Time isn't real.
03:06:51
It means something more precise.
03:06:52
It means time is real,
03:06:53
but only occurring only from inside only, for instance, only locally.
03:06:57
So once you're not local to this realm, to this dimension,
03:07:01
you're not bound by it.
03:07:04
The universe does not have a single tiny boy.
03:07:06
That sounds familiar.
03:07:07
It sounds so familiar rising from a relationship.
03:07:09
And I don't think that these people that wrote all these stories
03:07:11
that we that have similarity because just Gary,
03:07:14
I think, thinks they're similar because they just heard the other story.
03:07:17
I think these people found the secret to this and was trying to tell us,
03:07:21
or trying to preserve the history of this.
03:07:24
They was trying to tell us, they was trying to tell us something
03:07:27
between a particular observer and a particular clock, what we call time.
03:07:30
We measure the structure our entire existence around
03:07:33
is something that emerges from entanglement, from quantum.
03:07:35
I would almost call it our awareness and consciousness.
03:07:37
Even a relation between the system has no global time
03:07:39
or what I find genuinely curious about this is a question.
03:07:42
It open to the boundary
03:07:43
if time emerges on the relationship between observer and system,
03:07:45
if it is not a backdrop or a product,
03:07:46
what happens to the edges of the relationship?
03:07:48
What happened to time before observers existed?
03:07:50
Was there a then at all?
03:07:51
And is the question even coherence
03:07:52
given the word before we assume something, we try to explain.
03:07:54
While theories work through what the result
03:07:56
means, other physicists are doing something more immediate.
03:07:58
They are pushing on general relativity with precision.
03:07:59
It is never faced before
03:08:01
looking for the exact point where it's not to show a crime.
03:08:03
The Machine Atomic Clock
03:08:04
ensemble in space is running right now on the National Space Station.
03:08:06
It carries two clocks very low, a cold by sea and yes, in France.
03:08:09
And as a hydrogen, I said Swiss institutions.
03:08:12
Together they generate a tiny signal with a fractional frequency
03:08:14
of one times ten to the power of -16.
03:08:16
And that little precision, even the smallest deviations
03:08:18
from general relativity predictions, become visible.
03:08:20
The clocks on the i.s.s.
03:08:21
compared continuously with networks of atomic clocks on the ground
03:08:23
through a microwave link that works for all known sources of noise and drift.
03:08:25
What the machine is looking for is any departure
03:08:26
from what Einstein's equations predict,
03:08:27
for how time runs at an altitude and velocity.
03:08:29
Not to confirm relativity. Relativity has confirmed enough times.
03:08:32
What they are looking for is where fails
03:08:34
because everyone the field knows it must be somewhere.
03:08:35
General relativity and quantum mechanics cannot be completely correct,
03:08:38
and some type of precision one of them has to show a crack.
03:08:40
Can they look at this?
03:08:42
Must expect it should be visible in the data.
03:08:44
The result is coming in.
03:08:45
And what I find striking about that,
03:08:46
genuinely striking, is that we are living at the exact moment
03:08:48
when the most precise test of time ever conducted is running,
03:08:50
and the answer is not yet.
03:08:51
What do you do that most people have no idea the system exists.
03:08:54
The crack, if it is there, is being measured right now.
03:08:56
Nobody knows yet which side that we are on.
03:08:58
What the machine cannot do is has general relativity
03:08:59
and quantum mechanics simultaneously in a single measurement.
03:09:01
Those two theories are of different scales,
03:09:03
and every experimental now has tested one or the other, but never both at once.
03:09:06
That changed in July 2045.
03:09:07
Economically, it seems astute.
03:09:08
Jacob, to the University of Illinois and you had a scholar at Harvard
03:09:11
published a protocol in quantum physics,
03:09:12
something I find almost audacious installation that designed
03:09:14
put an atomic clock into a superposition of two different heights
03:09:16
above the surface,
03:09:17
the same clock at the same moment, its intensity higher and lower.
03:09:20
In quantum mechanics or in general relativity,
03:09:22
the two height correspond to two different rates 2.5.
03:09:24
So the clock in superposition is simply the two different rates of time.
03:09:27
I need to be answering those two time flows.
03:09:29
The quantum signature of superposition can be measured.
03:09:31
This has never been done before.
03:09:32
Wait,
03:09:33
because it finds both quantum clearance and gravitational position
03:09:35
at a level the only recently became technically feasible.
03:09:36
What makes this matter is not just precision,
03:09:38
it is what the result is for us to include
03:09:40
every experiment before this test of quantum mechanics
03:09:41
in flat spacetime or general relativity without quantum effects.
03:09:44
This is the first particle that makes both theories
03:09:46
show up in the same number at the same moment,
03:09:47
and that number does not matter what you do, they reproduce individually.
03:09:49
If the combined quantum gravitation
03:09:51
behavior time is something neither framework anticipated,
03:09:53
then we will have direct experimental evidence
03:09:54
that both approximations do something.
03:09:56
We do not yet have a theory.
03:09:57
Well, name a theory nobody's written down yet.
03:09:59
What would it even look like? That is not a rhetorical question.
03:10:01
It is the actual open problem.
03:10:02
There is a detail about quantum conditions that has not yet come to me
03:10:04
into any of the frameworks we've been building.
03:10:06
The event has a duration,
03:10:07
not duration, measured by an external clock,
03:10:09
a duration written to the geometry of the material itself.
03:10:11
Hugo del team at ePFl showed this in February 2026.
03:10:14
They measured how long it takes an electron to absorb a photon
03:10:15
and jump to a high energy state without using any external reference.
03:10:18
We measured high energy state.
03:10:21
That sounds like something else I've heard before too,
03:10:24
under this kind, relying on the clock saying outside the quantum system,
03:10:26
timing it from without, what they'll send it instead was used
03:10:28
quantum systems own internal structure to record the duration.
03:10:30
When an electron absorbs the photon,
03:10:32
it can follow multiple quantum pathways simultaneously.
03:10:34
These ways interfere with each other, and the interference
03:10:35
leaves a signature in the spin of the emitted electron.
03:10:37
By analyzing that signature, the team to determine how long the transition
03:10:39
took entirely for information encoded inside the process itself.
03:10:41
What they found is that quantum transitions are not instantaneous.
03:10:44
They have a measurable duration,
03:10:45
but the duration depends on the atomic structure of the material change
03:10:47
the symmetry of the crystal, and the transition takes longer.
03:10:49
Lower symmetry, long time, high symmetry, shorter time.
03:10:51
The geometry of the period not not not an external blow,
03:10:55
not the flow of time around the shape of the thing itself.
03:10:57
And this is in the same family as the Willard results
03:10:59
and the Marie-Eve experiment.
03:11:00
If the duration of a quantum event is determined by internal geometry
03:11:02
rather than external time, what exactly is flowing?
03:11:04
When we say time flows, is it possible that what we call time
03:11:06
is just a way of describing the internal geometry processes?
03:11:08
That duration is not something events happen inside,
03:11:10
but something that is a property of the events themselves.
03:11:12
I don't know how to make idea comfortable,
03:11:13
but I also do not know how to dismiss it.
03:11:15
And back to that NIST clock from the beginning, the same month,
03:11:18
because his team published that quantum network protocol,
03:11:20
the NIST in Boulder, and now something that connects
03:11:22
all of these threads to a question most physicists consider
03:11:24
much too large to ask directly.
03:11:26
The aluminum ion clock. I can have a comment from
03:11:29
30 viewers, for it is now sensitive enough to detect changes
03:11:31
in the fundamental constants of nature
03:11:32
the fine structure constant, which determines how small
03:11:34
I don't have to call in the gravitational constant, is one, five, eight, six,
03:11:37
three or what is written into the equations,
03:11:40
but they are not derived from anything deeper.
03:11:42
They are measured anything or measured quantities.
03:11:44
While the math is there is no one. The reason I have to say constant.
03:11:46
They could drift slowly, almost be on detection, but measurably.
03:11:50
If you have a precise enough instrument,
03:11:51
the newest clock is not precise enough to check, not to actually check.
03:11:55
And if the concept of drifting, if the fine structure
03:11:56
constant today is not exactly what it was a billion years ago,
03:11:59
then the laws of physics as we know them are not eternal truths.
03:12:01
They are snapshots, descriptions.
03:12:03
The universe just happens to be right now, at this moment in cosmic history.
03:12:05
And if the laws of changing then time, the dimension
03:12:07
on which they change, is more fundamental than the laws themselves.
03:12:10
Time's up.
03:12:10
Being a consequence of physics,
03:12:11
it becomes a thing because it happens inside
03:12:13
which everything we thought we knew about the relationship
03:12:14
between time, a physical law and that version can accelerate to a crack
03:12:17
that has been widening the center cosmology for about a decade,
03:12:19
a crack that does not involve quantum mechanics at all.
03:12:21
But it's just too hard to explain away.
03:12:22
There's a number that's been sitting at the center
03:12:23
of cosmology for about a decade, refusing to resolve.
03:12:25
And it matters for exactly the reasons the necessity result matters.
03:12:28
It is the Hubble constant, the rate at which the universe is expanding.
03:12:30
That's all it should be. One number. The universe is one universe.
03:12:32
But when physicists measure it two independent ways,
03:12:34
they get two different answers.
03:12:35
The first method uses the cosmic microwave background.
03:12:37
The other, they just said there's one universe.
03:12:39
But when they there's two ways to measure it that tells.
03:12:43
And if there's two different outcomes,
03:12:44
that tells me that there is not just one universe.
03:12:47
The universe map with extraordinary precision by the Planck satellite in 2018.
03:12:51
This gives 67.4km per second per megaparsec.
03:12:53
The second method uses variable star as distance markers, led by Adam Reese
03:12:57
and his team, and gives 73.2g per second per megaparsec.
03:13:00
The difference is five sigma.
03:13:01
In physics, five sigma is a threshold to call something a discovery.
03:13:04
This gap is sigma.
03:13:05
That's what I call remember earlier I said five and the numbers do not converge.
03:13:09
Now here is why this belongs
03:13:10
to a conversation about time rather than just about space.
03:13:12
The Hubble constant is not just a rate of expansion, it is a rate of change.
03:13:14
Instead of saying God from this point forward, I would like to say the unknown.
03:13:18
The five of cosmic scales.
03:13:19
If two independent things are measuring the rate described by five sigma,
03:13:22
it means we do not fully understand how the geometry of space time scales.
03:13:25
And if we don't understand that, I'm saying that jokingly, but why?
03:13:27
Somebody will study religion, basically
03:13:29
what the cosmic events, the age of structures
03:13:30
is built on something, but it's not fully resolved.
03:13:32
What I find hard
03:13:32
to accept about this is how casually it is sometimes described
03:13:34
as a measurement problem, rather than a physics problem.
03:13:36
Five Sigma is not a rounding error, it is a signal.
03:13:38
And in 2024, a second incident made that signal considerably louder.
03:13:41
The Hubble tension was already upsetting enough on its own.
03:13:43
Then the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument added something worse.
03:13:46
As I spent years mapping the distribution galaxies across enormous volumes.
03:13:49
We don't like
03:13:50
to measure how cosmic expansion has changed a lot.
03:13:52
The data found in 2024 is the dark energy,
03:13:55
the force driving the acceleration of expansion,
03:13:56
the thing that Einstein called the cosmological constant may not be constant.
03:13:59
All the data suggests it is weakening slowly but measurably.
03:14:02
It was stronger.
03:14:02
The universe has been decreasing since dark energy is the engine
03:14:04
driving the expansion of space and the expansion of space is a mechanism
03:14:07
by which the universe has a cosmic history,
03:14:08
a sequence of events, an earlier and a later, a past and a future.
03:14:11
At a larger scales,
03:14:13
if the engine is not constant,
03:14:14
then the rate at which cosmic time flows is not constant either
03:14:16
the universe is not just expanding, it is expanding a rate that is itself
03:14:18
changing in a way we do not predict and do not fully understand.
03:14:20
And the uncomfortable application of the desi result
03:14:22
sitting alongside the Hubble tension, is that our model of cosmic time
03:14:24
is built on assumptions of dark energy that may be wrong.
03:14:26
If dark energy is evolving, the timeline shifts what we did.
03:14:29
It may have occurred.
03:14:29
Different moments in the history of universe
03:14:31
all the time depends on what time is doing the cosmic scales.
03:14:33
And right now, two of the most important moment
03:14:34
in cosmology are telling us something we do not yet know how to read.
03:14:37
I think this gets under-reported
03:14:38
because it is too large to sensationalized cleanly.
03:14:40
But the ram is moving,
03:14:40
and if the energy of cosmic time is changing, it raises a question.
03:14:43
Nobody in the field has a competent answer to changing toward what there's a risk
03:14:46
that all of this starts to feel like trouble.
03:14:47
The edges exact problems do not touch the solid ground
03:14:49
we already know,
03:14:50
but the solid ground has its own strangeness
03:14:52
and has been measured clearly enough that there is no room to dismiss it.
03:14:54
In 1959, Robert Pound and Glenn Becker did an experiment, a Harvard
03:14:57
that is about as clean and direct as it gets.
03:14:59
They measured
03:14:59
whether light changes frequency as it moves through a competition field,
03:15:02
where light loses energy climbing up and gains every falling down.
03:15:04
They did this by shining
03:15:05
gamma rays
03:15:05
about a 22.5m tall, and measuring whether the frequency of a light
03:15:07
at the top differed from what was imaged at the bottom,
03:15:09
it did the shift match exactly what general relativity did,
03:15:12
a prediction
03:15:12
Einstein made in 1907, 52 years before anyone measured it using nothing
03:15:15
but principle acceleration and gravity argument.
03:15:17
What strikes me about this is not confirmation.
03:15:19
It is a gap.
03:15:20
52 years between predictions
03:15:21
and the measurement arrived exactly what the theory said it would.
03:15:23
Time really does run slow at the bottom of a table.
03:15:25
Then at the top, not by much.
03:15:26
A few pass in ten to the power 15,
03:15:28
but unambiguously, repeatedly in a building in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
03:15:30
I know since then has been a deeper version of the same question.
03:15:33
Why does the geometry of space time make the rate of time depend on position?
03:15:36
And the deeper you push the question
03:15:37
through the geometry, the result through the Oxford quantum clock,
03:15:40
through the equation for three becomes the strangeness is not the edge.
03:15:44
It was in the building in 1959.
03:15:46
We just don't really see it yet.
03:15:47
Something physicists have predicted for decades
03:15:48
but never managed to produce cleanly in a lottery.
03:15:50
Only in the 25.
03:15:51
And the result is one of the things that sounds like science fiction,
03:15:53
until you look at what it actually demonstrates.
03:15:55
Him and his team at the University in New York system
03:15:57
that reflects electromagnetic waves in time rather than in space.
03:15:59
Normally, when a wave hits a boundary, a wall, a surface,
03:16:01
a transition between two materials, it reflects back through space, moves
03:16:04
to create a temporal boundary. Instead,
03:16:06
by suddenly and uniformly changing the physical properties of the medium.
03:16:08
The way it was traveling through time machine,
03:16:10
the system instantaneously was invented.
03:16:11
It created a moment in time where wave experienced discontinuity
03:16:14
and the wave reflected, not backward, through space, through time,
03:16:17
the signal began retracing its own history.
03:16:19
It went back through the same medium it already passed through,
03:16:21
reproducing the past states of the wave in reverse order.
03:16:23
The team also observed people report that their entire life
03:16:26
flashes before their eyes, before their their awareness is ending.
03:16:31
Translation.
03:16:32
The reflected wave emerged at a different
03:16:35
state like I.
03:16:36
What I am suggesting then
03:16:37
is you actually go through that back to wherever you started, whatever that is.
03:16:41
Instead of just empty blackness, you go back to where you started frequency.
03:16:45
Then the original,
03:16:45
which is the temple equivalent of the wave changing in our brains.
03:16:48
We're like, no, because there's there's the arrow of time.
03:16:50
And so it's impossible, but it's clearly not impossible direction.
03:16:54
When it enters a different medium anyway, it's measurably not impossible.
03:16:58
The result was clean, repeatable,
03:17:00
and confirmed a theoretic prediction that it existed since the 1960s
03:17:02
without ever been clearly demonstrated.
03:17:04
The experiment is careful to know the time outside the system continued normally.
03:17:06
What changed was the behavior of the wave inside an entity, a temporal boundary.
03:17:09
But the note of caution while scientifically accurate,
03:17:11
it's not fully dissolved.
03:17:11
The question
03:17:12
the experiment raises
03:17:12
is the boundary between past and future is something that can be engineered,
03:17:14
something that responds to the physical properties of a medium.
03:17:16
What exactly is a boundary?
03:17:17
What is the separating the mechanism of music?
03:17:19
Excitement reveals something about time that was always true, and it's something
03:17:21
that we demonstrate this clearly for when a wave hits a spatial boundary,
03:17:24
a wall, what is conserved is its frequency.
03:17:25
The pitch stays the same, the direction
03:17:27
the temporal boundary works the opposite way.
03:17:29
When the medium changes suddenly in time rather than space, what is conserved
03:17:31
is the direction, the way it keeps moving forward through space.
03:17:33
But it's really changes, shifting to the value of the new medium.
03:17:36
And simultaneously,
03:17:37
a time reverse copy of the wave is generated propagating backward.
03:17:39
This is not a property of quantum systems.
03:17:41
It follows our Maxwell's equations, which are among the most tested
03:17:43
relationships in all of physics,
03:17:44
which means the capacity for time reversal is not something
03:17:46
that has to be injected into physics time outside it is already there
03:17:48
in the structure of the equations, waiting for the right physical conditions.
03:17:51
Moose's team did not discover something new.
03:17:52
They revealed something and that is a different result.
03:17:55
It says that the asymmetry of time,
03:17:57
the fact that waves travel forward and not backward,
03:17:58
that signals propagate into the future and not past,
03:18:00
is not written into the laws of electromagnetism at all.
03:18:02
It is written into the initial conditions, into the fact that we start with a wave
03:18:05
and a medium that is uniform.
03:18:07
Change the medium suddenly and the equations
03:18:08
produce both direction spontaneously the arrow of time.
03:18:11
Even in classical physics, is not law.
03:18:12
It is a choice of starting conditions.
03:18:14
And this brings back the passage from Boltzmann.
03:18:15
Now Ciampa,
03:18:16
who chose the starting conditions or more precisely, wasn't a choice at all.
03:18:19
Or was it the only option available? That is not a rhetorical question.
03:18:21
Is one of the open problems in physics.
03:18:23
That question why the initial conditions were, why we were connect the results
03:18:25
from particle physics I find deeply puzzling,
03:18:27
and let's just call it creation for now.
03:18:29
They do not get enough attention, wish they would have time
03:18:31
to speed up our experiment.
03:18:32
SLAC, measured in 2012,
03:18:33
was direct evidence of time reversal by violation instead of particles.
03:18:36
They were studying bosons on separation of the arrow of time onwards.
03:18:40
The question was whether the process of going from, say, to say, be the creation
03:18:42
of the arrow of time that we are currently in, just started
03:18:45
because some observer somewhere in some in this universe decided to
03:18:51
was statistically identical to the process of going from, say,
03:18:53
be back to say if time is truly symmetric, those rate should equal they were not.
03:18:57
The transition rates differed by a measurable amount.
03:18:59
Then in 2020,
03:19:00
the team took it from Japan, found a related asymmetry in neutrinos, matter
03:19:03
and antimatter versions of the same particle,
03:19:04
oscillating between different types at different rates.
03:19:06
Both results are real,
03:19:07
both are statistically robust, and both show that the arrow telling
03:19:09
is not just a statistical tendency at large scales.
03:19:11
The way Boltzmann described it,
03:19:12
it is built into behavior of individual particles in ways that a standard
03:19:14
model can accommodate mathematically, but cannot explain
03:19:16
how we can describe the asymmetry.
03:19:17
We cannot say why exists.
03:19:19
What bothers me about this
03:19:20
is the gap between the aspirations we have and the explanation we actually need.
03:19:23
Boltzmann gave us thermodynamics,
03:19:24
the arrow of time as a statistical bias toward more probable states.
03:19:26
But baseball and T2 are showing something
03:19:28
at the particle level that is not statistical.
03:19:30
It is structural, built in the level of individual interactions,
03:19:32
and the structural asymmetry demands a structure explanation.
03:19:34
We do not have one, which means the deeper source of time
03:19:36
direction remains unknown even as measurements get more precise.
03:19:39
The baseball and T2 results show
03:19:40
that the direction of falling is built
03:19:41
in the individual particle area, but that is a result for quantum mechanics
03:19:43
to add something almost opposite to the picture,
03:19:45
not the time has a fixed direction, but the observation can stop entirely.
03:19:48
It is called the quantum Zeno effect, first proposed by George
03:19:50
Sajjan and Misra in 1977 and confirmed experimentally multiple times since.
03:19:53
The idea
03:19:54
is this a quantum system evolves at time, a particle decays and atom transition
03:19:57
between energy levels, a quantum state changes.
03:19:59
This evolution has a calculated timescale, but if you measure the system
03:20:01
for long enough, if you observe fast enough, the evolution slows down.
03:20:03
The more often you look,
03:20:04
the slower changes, and in the limit continuous observation,
03:20:06
the system stops evolving and tiny it freezes.
03:20:08
You can hold a quantum system in its current state
03:20:09
indefinitely simply by measuring it fast enough. Yeah, now.
03:20:11
But this looks like the Oxford example.
03:20:13
Observation. Create the arrow of time.
03:20:14
The Zeno effect says observation also controls the rate of time.
03:20:16
That's how fast quantum pollution precedes frequency of slows quantum time.
03:20:20
No observation removes the arrow entirely.
03:20:21
And the actor observing costs energy as I showed,
03:20:23
which means the controlling time at a quantum level
03:20:25
has a thermodynamic price you pay to slow it by to give direction.
03:20:28
Time in this picture is not really flowing independent of everything around it,
03:20:31
in something closer to a process of quantum dissipation,
03:20:32
to sustain and participation to direct,
03:20:34
which raises a question I find genuinely different result
03:20:36
if observations the same time, if the rate and direction of time
03:20:38
depend on the presence of frequency measurement,
03:20:39
what was time doing before there was anything
03:20:41
the universe capable of observing anything wasn't doing anything?
03:20:43
People always ask what was there before the Big Bang
03:20:48
then?
03:20:48
And if the answer is no, then what exactly started
03:20:50
the fact that observationally, for all time, the quantum
03:20:52
mechanical precision suddenly felt less like engineering
03:20:54
and more like philosophy made physical?
03:20:55
Because the more precisely you can measure time,
03:20:57
the more deeply you can follow these facts and precision.
03:20:58
Took a step in 2024 and 2025 that changes what is possible.
03:21:01
Multiple teams at PTB in Brunswick
03:21:03
and Agile in Boulder demonstrated working nuclear blocks based on thorium 239.
03:21:07
The difference between these and conventional
03:21:08
atomic clocks is not just precision, it is what is doing.
03:21:10
The oscillating atomic clocks use the transitions electrons and shells, atoms
03:21:14
which interact with the surrounding electromagnetic environment
03:21:16
and can be disturbed by electric and magnetic fields.
03:21:18
Nuclear talks use conditions inside the atomic nucleus itself,
03:21:20
shielded from almost everything outside the electron cloud surrounding nucleus.
03:21:23
The result is a stability order of magnitude
03:21:24
better than atomic clocks and a sensitivity to fact.
03:21:26
The atomic clocks cannot reach
03:21:27
specifically to changes in the strong nuclear
03:21:28
force, the force holding protons and neutrons together.
03:21:30
If the strong force has a coupling constant
03:21:32
that varies even slightly for the cosmological time,
03:21:33
a nuclear clock will eventually detect it.
03:21:35
And here is why that matters. Beyond the obvious.
03:21:36
If fundamental constants are changing,
03:21:38
then the laws of physics, historical rather than eternal.
03:21:40
They have a before and after, which means they are inside time
03:21:42
anything also inside time. Time can be derived from the laws.
03:21:45
Something has gone in a circle.
03:21:46
In physics, a circle usually means a missing piece.
03:21:48
The circle is been sitting here for decades.
03:21:50
The nuclear clock is the first, in German,
03:21:51
precise enough to start looking for what it finds or does not find
03:21:54
will either close the circle or force it to redraw, and tiny
03:21:56
that circle time cannot be derived from those other cells in time runs
03:21:59
directly to something happening right now at the level of internal standards.
03:22:02
I think the way this is usually reported
03:22:03
varies what is actually everything about it.
03:22:05
The entire community is preparing to redefine the second.
03:22:07
A coordinate comparison of optical clocks across six countries, published in June
03:22:09
2045, was a major step toward making this formal sometime around 2030.
03:22:12
The current position,
03:22:13
based on constellations since 1967, is being replaced
03:22:15
with something based on optical transitions.
03:22:17
Oscillating a frequency is roughly 10,000 times
03:22:18
higher than cesium, measurable with far greater resolution. Yeah. That's right.
03:22:21
Now here's what gets left out of this reporting on this.
03:22:23
The definition is not just a technical grade.
03:22:24
It is an admission,
03:22:25
an admission that the previous ruler was not precise enough
03:22:27
to measure the thing we are actually trying to understand.
03:22:29
The new definition will allow physicists to test
03:22:30
whether fundamental constants drift to probe quantum variation behavior.
03:22:33
Time to run experiments. The cesium found it simply could not support.
03:22:35
But here's why I keep coming back to every definition of a second.
03:22:37
The old one and the new one is a definition of how time behaves,
03:22:40
not what time is.
03:22:41
The standards committee is not in the business of answering that nobody is.
03:22:43
And the remarkable thing about reading the rule right now is that the new rules
03:22:45
will be precise enough to show with things we have never seen before,
03:22:47
whether what it shows us will tell us what time actually is,
03:22:49
or just give us more precise description of something we still do not understand.
03:22:52
That is the question.
03:22:52
The definition process. Wait, the ruler?
03:22:55
You mean like a king?
03:22:56
We have always.
03:22:57
But maybe the only question that matters.
03:22:58
And I wonder sometimes whether the answer when it comes,
03:23:00
will look anything like what any of us are expecting.
03:23:02
If you try to follow all of these results to a single conclusion, the NIST talk,
03:23:05
the whole tension DSI, the weird equation, the Mareeba experiment, the Oxford
03:23:08
quantum clock, what you run into is the same wall from every direction.
03:23:11
Time is not what we thought it was,
03:23:12
and the frameworks we have do not agree on what it actually is. Oh really?
03:23:14
Everybody's onto this develop with at modern in loop
03:23:16
quantum gravity since 1988 is to say the time is not around.
03:23:19
It is not a date on which events occur.
03:23:21
It is a description of how we then write two events related
03:23:23
if one influences the other,
03:23:24
if a signal can pass between them if they have a causal connection.
03:23:26
Time in loop quantum gravity is nothing more than the ordering of the relations.
03:23:29
It is nothing. It is a description.
03:23:31
Rovelli makes a point that is easy to understand and hard
03:23:33
to accept when you remove the thermodynamic approximation,
03:23:35
when you look at a small enough system with even a particle
03:23:37
that statistical effects vanish, time disappears from the equations.
03:23:39
The equations have no clear direction, no flow, no before and after time.
03:23:43
He argues.
03:23:43
There's no way
03:23:44
when you have a large enough system with enough interacting parts,
03:23:46
that statistical behavior emerges and entropy starts increasing.
03:23:48
Time is a macroscopic phenomenon like temperature.
03:23:50
Temperature does not exist for a single molecule,
03:23:52
exist for large collections of molecules.
03:23:53
Okay, average energy
03:23:55
time in this view, exists for large collections of events
03:23:57
as a measure of the average causal ordering,
03:23:58
which means that asking what time is doing at the small scales
03:24:01
at the Planck length, at the level of individual quantum events,
03:24:03
is like asking what the temperature of a single proton is.
03:24:06
The question may simply not apply,
03:24:07
and if time does not apply to small scales,
03:24:09
then the question writes itself what exactly does it emerge from it?
03:24:11
Look, quantum gravity does time into relation between events.
03:24:13
Roger Penrose takes the same problem, a completely different picture.
03:24:15
His framework, conformal cosmology, does not try to explain where time comes from.
03:24:19
It tries to explain why the universe started suddenly.
03:24:20
Probably altered state in the first place.
03:24:22
That is the real mystery.
03:24:22
Underneath everything open identified
03:24:24
the arrow of time points from low entropy to high entropy.
03:24:26
Fine. But why was entropy so low? The beginning?
03:24:28
Why did universe start in extraordinary order
03:24:30
when the overwhelming majority of possible initial states are disordered?
03:24:32
The standard answer they just did, and we should not ask why,
03:24:34
has always felt like a place holder. Penrose refuses to accept it.
03:24:37
His proposal is that the Big Bang was not a beginning.
03:24:39
It was a transition in conformance.
03:24:40
Like apology, the universe passes through an infinite sequence beyond.
03:24:43
It starts something like a big bang and ends with something like a heat death,
03:24:45
maximum entropy, cold, empty, dark.
03:24:48
There in the far future of
03:24:49
neon, when all matter has decayed and all black holes have to break it.
03:24:51
Only infinities, rain, photons and cratons moving at the speed of light
03:24:55
and massless particles do not experience time.
03:24:56
I've never had no internal clock.
03:24:58
The distance between the nanosecond between them
03:25:00
at that point and resolves the universe loses track of scale.
03:25:02
It cannot switch between very large and very small in that scale state.
03:25:05
The cold, empty end of one year on in the hot, dense beginning of the next
03:25:07
becomes geometrically equivalent.
03:25:08
The heat, death and the Big Bang are the same moment seen from different sides.
03:25:11
There's a the beginning of time at the same event,
03:25:13
which means a low entropy beginning of a universe is not an accident.
03:25:14
Require an explanation.
03:25:15
It is a mechanical consequence of the high entropy end of the previous one.
03:25:18
I find this answer either deeply satisfying or deeply unsatisfying.
03:25:20
Depend on the day. Why can't we discuss the geometry works?
03:25:23
Stephen Hawking arrived at a similar solution
03:25:24
from a completely different mechanical direction,
03:25:26
working with James Hartley in 1983, he proposed what they call
03:25:28
the no boundary condition, a way of describing a quantum state.
03:25:30
The universe does not require an initial condition at all.
03:25:32
The approach uses a mathematical technique called a rotation,
03:25:34
which replaces real time with imaginary time,
03:25:35
multiplying the time coordinate by the square root of negative one.
03:25:37
This sounds like a formal trick in the context quantum gravity.
03:25:40
Hawking and hotly argued it is more than an imaginary time.
03:25:42
The discussion between time and space disappears.
03:25:43
The four dimensions of space time become four spatial dimensions,
03:25:45
all equivalent, not playing the central role.
03:25:47
Time plays in ordinary physics, and in this four dimensions, spatial geometry.
03:25:49
There is no boundary, no edge, no point.
03:25:51
You can call it again, just as the surface of the earth has no edge,
03:25:53
you can travel in that direction infinitely without reaching a wall.
03:25:55
The universe in imaginary time has no beginning.
03:25:57
The bang, when you rotate back from the imaginary
03:25:58
time to real time, appears not as a moment where time start from zero,
03:26:01
but as the point where a spatial geometry transitions into a spacetime geometry.
03:26:03
A smooth, rounded top like the bottom of a sphere.
03:26:05
Time do not begin there.
03:26:06
It emerged that from a region with distinction
03:26:08
between time and space did not apply.
03:26:09
What I find striking about both Penrose and Hawking here is that they are pointing
03:26:12
at the same thing from opposite directions,
03:26:13
and says the beginning was the end of something
03:26:15
else, Hawking says, beginning with a smooth geometric transition
03:26:17
from time to state, both to solve the question of what came before
03:26:19
but not answer the question that emerges from dissolving it.
03:26:21
If time emerged, whether from previous eon or from the metric geometry,
03:26:23
what determines which way it appeared?
03:26:25
There's one piece of the picture that connect the largest scales
03:26:27
to the smallest.
03:26:27
In a way, none of the theoretical frameworks managed to reconcile.
03:26:30
It concerns black holes and what information inside them.
03:26:32
And it matters here because of what it lies about,
03:26:33
whether the past is a different thing.
03:26:35
Hawking showed in the 1970s that black holes emit radiation, now
03:26:37
called Hawking radiation,
03:26:38
as a consequence of quantum effects near the event horizon.
03:26:40
This radiation is thermal.
03:26:41
It carries energy, but no information about what
03:26:43
fell into the black hole is random.
03:26:44
And as the black hole slowly operates, the information about everything
03:26:47
every particle, every quantum state, every physical data appears to be born,
03:26:50
not hidden, not encoded in correlations to subtle detection.
03:26:53
This violates unitarity.
03:26:54
The requirement quantum mechanics of quantum
03:26:55
evolution is reversible and the information is always conserved.
03:26:57
If information can't be destroyed, the past cannot be reconstruct
03:26:59
from the present,
03:27:00
even in principle, the chain of cause and effect
03:27:01
that makes the past a well-defined thing becomes undefined for anything
03:27:04
across an event horizon.
03:27:05
The reason that belongs to a conversation
03:27:06
about time is the temporal order and information
03:27:08
preservation are the same thing, seen for different angles.
03:27:10
To say that the past is definite,
03:27:11
that events happened in a specific sequence is to say the information
03:27:13
about those events is preserved some way in the present.
03:27:15
If black holes destroy information, they destroy the defense of the past.
03:27:18
They introduce a genuine ambiguity in the timeline.
03:27:19
The universe a note started from outside can resolve,
03:27:21
and there are a lot of black holes, which means past.
03:27:23
Maybe less than nothing we assume.
03:27:24
And if the past is not fully definite,
03:27:25
if the timeline the universe has genuine gaps in it, then what exactly is the thing
03:27:27
we are trying to make out when we point to reality here?
03:27:29
Something that should probably be more than it is?
03:27:31
The twin paradox.
03:27:32
The thought experiment where one twin travels idly
03:27:34
and returns younger is not a thought experiment.
03:27:36
It has been measured.
03:27:37
Astronauts who spend six months on the ancestral space station
03:27:39
return to Earth,
03:27:39
having aged approximately 0.007 seconds less than people who stayed on the ground.
03:27:43
Scott Kelly, who spent nearly a year on the U.S.,
03:27:45
is measurably younger than his identical twin, Mark, who remained on Earth.
03:27:47
The difference is seven milliseconds, about 340 days real measured,
03:27:50
which means two people who want the same amount,
03:27:52
who start with identical clocks live different
03:27:54
all of time during the same period.
03:27:55
They vary in different quantities of duration,
03:27:57
and the part of this gets overlooked in the end.
03:27:58
The reporting is not just milliseconds,
03:28:00
it is what seven milliseconds implies that the concept of a shared presence.
03:28:02
When Kelly returned from the I.s.s., he and his brother
03:28:04
were not at the same moment in time in any absolute sense.
03:28:06
They were. It's it's measurable.
03:28:11
And I'd be so bold to say if I was
03:28:13
if I was living seven milliseconds behind you, you would not be aware of me
03:28:18
for the same location in space.
03:28:19
But the amount of time each passed through was different than ours.
03:28:22
We're not the same now,
03:28:22
and it is true for two people separated by 400km altitude and orbital velocity.
03:28:26
It is true in principle for any context, anywhere in universe.
03:28:28
Every object carries its own local time.
03:28:30
Those local times do not sum to a single shared timeline
03:28:31
that the universe is moving through together.
03:28:33
There was no universe now, and once you fully accept that not as an abstract
03:28:36
physical result, but as a physical fact that this.
03:28:40
Amount of this is there for the short period.
03:28:42
Dorsey calls from Madison Heights just calling in regards to your interest.
03:28:47
After every program.
03:28:50
Or tax bracket?
03:28:51
24883807.
03:28:55
Hi. This message is for flash.
03:28:57
Hey lady.
03:29:01
No, that message is for fledge I think was for Phoenix College.
03:29:04
This is for Dorsey Massage School.
03:29:07
Wait, we have one more now.
03:29:09
I don't know who left this one, but wow.
03:29:12
Yes. Is offering funds for a free transfer
03:29:16
right? Oh.
03:29:20
I don't know how we missed that.
03:29:21
How do we miss that egg roll?
03:29:24
Yeah, this is, showing some of our printed plans
03:29:27
right?
03:29:30
To reality.
03:29:31
The question that follows is one I do not think has a comfortable answer.
03:29:33
If there's no chat present, what exactly is the investor doing right now?
03:29:36
The relativity of simultaneity goes further than the twin result,
03:29:38
and it is worth taking seriously.
03:29:39
Rather than finding a way as to abstract a matter,
03:29:41
Einstein showed in 1905 the two events whose result is one
03:29:45
at least with two twin illusion by which one was the father,
03:29:48
a genuine feature of the universe that earlier really worked
03:29:50
at the same time in one different frame and a different time in another.
03:29:52
Neither frame is correct.
03:29:53
Both are equally valid assertions of reality.
03:29:55
What this means is that the concept of now
03:29:57
a single present moment extending across space, is not a feature of us.
03:29:59
It is a feature of a particular reference frame.
03:30:01
Change of velocity and now changes events in the future,
03:30:03
becomes simultaneously dependent upon your past,
03:30:05
but somewhat moving directly relative to you.
03:30:06
The physicist
03:30:07
and the philosopher Putnam argued in the 1960s
03:30:09
that this implies a block universe, a four dimension structure
03:30:11
in which all members of time exist equally past, present, and future.
03:30:13
All. Yes, speaking of being, speaking of spite fights
03:30:16
that the victory is not worth the actual fight.
03:30:20
How's your, water neighbor issue that resolve itself?
03:30:26
It will,
03:30:29
when the survey gets done, checks in the mail.
03:30:33
There's a plan.
03:30:33
You just got to move the fence.
03:30:36
We're going to get a survey, and then we're going to go from there.
03:30:41
But so as of today, though, there's still water drainage.
03:30:45
Yeah okay.
03:30:47
Just checking in how to it's better due to steps.
03:30:50
It's always better due to.
03:30:52
But I'm not going to judge it when the rest of he said do you do.
03:30:57
I'm not going to judge it when the rest of the property is is kind of amazing.
03:31:01
When the rest of the property is not that moist
03:31:04
and that area is specifically moist, like that's what I don't like.
03:31:07
Can you stop saying the one of my lawn
03:31:10
when I try to mow my lawn, and that's the only area that there's mud.
03:31:13
And then I'm having issues driving through and it's fucking up my grass
03:31:16
that I planted. Yeah. Then we're going to have a problem.
03:31:19
But that's when also the survey's
03:31:21
just going to let them know that their stamp patio is also on our property.
03:31:25
And so we're going to have to have that conversation.
03:31:27
And then that pipe is like right up to our property line.
03:31:29
Yeah.
03:31:30
If the survey doesn't work, may I suggest a potato sack to the facts
03:31:34
rather than a fundamental feature of reality? They've been able to
03:31:37
push back on this, arguing that the block universe
03:31:39
interpretation smuggles in assumptions about what real means.
03:31:41
But the physics does not force
03:31:42
both positions to be data that is not an underlying physical fact.
03:31:45
Victor, as moment as your appearance is a local phenomenon.
03:31:47
Real for you, real.
03:31:49
Everything in your media vicinity.
03:31:50
Something you know
03:31:51
if the presence is local and the flow of time,
03:31:53
the moving from one person to the next is also local personal,
03:31:56
not the other source.
03:31:57
Which means when we ask what time is, we may be asking what we are,
03:31:59
not, what the inverse is, what Rovelli concludes.
03:32:00
Conclusion. All of this is not the time is an illusion.
03:32:02
It is something more precise and in some ways more troubling, he says.
03:32:04
Time is not river or riverbanks.
03:32:06
A current direction exists independent of the water.
03:32:08
Time is more like heat.
03:32:09
He doesn't exist in a single molecule,
03:32:11
is not a property of any individual particle.
03:32:12
It emerges from a collective behavior of enormous numbers of people interacting,
03:32:15
and it flows from hot to cold, not because any law demands it,
03:32:17
but because the statistics of large numbers overwhelmingly favorite.
03:32:19
Remove the large numbers
03:32:20
down to individual proportions and heat loses its meaning.
03:32:22
Tiny time really works the same way at the level of physics and the equations
03:32:26
describing individual events and relations.
03:32:27
There was no time, no flow, no direction, no before and after these emerge.
03:32:31
I'm going to zoom out.
03:32:31
When you have enough
03:32:32
enough entanglement in a thermodynamic capacity,
03:32:34
that statistical behavior kicks in and entropy starts increasing.
03:32:36
Time is what universe looks like on the inside
03:32:38
when it is big enough and complex enough to have a thermodynamic arrow.
03:32:41
So is time real?
03:32:42
I think that is the wrong question.
03:32:43
Or even unspecified. One temperature is real.
03:32:45
It is measurable.
03:32:45
It has genuine physical consequences,
03:32:47
but it does not exist at the level of individual particles.
03:32:49
Asking what temperature is real?
03:32:50
It's I what a collective image phenomena count as real.
03:32:52
And the honest answer is a physics does not have a clean way to dwell on
03:32:54
what it has is a growing collection of results
03:32:56
from 1895 through 2026 that keep pointing in the same direction.
03:33:00
Time is not what we thought it was,
03:33:01
and the more precisely the measurement, the more question opens up.
03:33:03
Rather than closing, Lee Smolin looks at the same data
03:33:05
and arrives at almost the opposite conclusion,
03:33:07
and the fact the two serious physicists can sit with identical example results
03:33:10
and reach incompatible positions is,
03:33:11
I think, the most honest theory of where the field actually stands.
03:33:13
Someone's argument developed in the two 2013 book and subsequent papers.
03:33:16
It's not for the question that Wiggins framework leaves unresolved.
03:33:18
If the laws of physics are what they are because of what they are,
03:33:20
if the constants in equations are fixed
03:33:21
even from outside and otherwise from anything deeper,
03:33:23
then the universe requires an explanation that physics can't provide
03:33:25
where the laws come from, why these values and others?
03:33:28
The standard answer is that we measure them rather than divide them.
03:33:31
Smolin finds this unsatisfying.
03:33:32
His proposal is that the laws of old
03:33:33
was that the universe has a history not just of events, but a physical law.
03:33:36
It's up to you.
03:33:36
That's like maybe the only time the monkeys like,
03:33:38
what if I don't want to be a monkey on universes?
03:33:41
Each, like all the forms, might spawn
03:33:42
a new universe with slightly different concepts.
03:33:43
Universes that produce more black holes reproduce more the laws we live in.
03:33:46
There are laws to make it the laws of and time prior to the laws.
03:33:49
You can't anything from the laws and the laws themselves.
03:33:51
Product of time.
03:33:51
Time has to be the one thing that is not naturally
03:33:53
can't walk because everything else acts like it.
03:33:55
We should direct opposition to Rovelli once these kinds of motions,
03:33:58
the other says time is fundamental.
03:33:59
Both are using the same experiments as I started.
03:34:01
I don't know who is right.
03:34:02
I'm more fundamental
03:34:04
in the fact the genuine unresolved
03:34:05
nature of the disagreement between people who look at the word
03:34:07
this question, the wording that Ervin forgive David Abel contribution to
03:34:11
the picture is quieter than reality is, just as his argument
03:34:15
complex thought.
03:34:18
It's like, I don't I don't know what, you know, where
03:34:22
we end up, but I mean, I don't have it all clear up on at WrestleMania.
03:34:26
I'm sure, laid out in a 2000 book, but I defines what he calls the pixel
03:34:30
to the single assumption that does all the work in our experience of time.
03:34:33
The assumption is this, you know, began in a state of extremely low entropy.
03:34:36
Fantastic for ordinary and probably almost unimaginably unbelievable.
03:34:40
But it is what is the most like.
03:34:43
This is what smart people all get around and theorize about.
03:34:48
And it's like,
03:34:50
how does that how does Gary not look at all this?
03:34:54
Like this?
03:34:54
The potential of there
03:34:55
being some type of originator or creator or whatever you want to call it,
03:35:00
they don't call it anything, or that as soon as you call it, as soon as you
03:35:03
call it something, there'll be a definitive way to argue against it.
03:35:08
The process that
03:35:10
caused the lawmaker,
03:35:13
let's call it five.
03:35:15
Fuck were they?
03:35:15
Five parsecs snap parsecs, five turnips
03:35:19
five.
03:35:20
Crispus.
03:35:23
Entropy and TB has been increasing ever since.
03:35:26
Not because any law requires it as a joke,
03:35:28
but because there are overwhelmingly more high entropy states than low entropy
03:35:30
ones, and random processes move toward the more probable.
03:35:32
That is the entire explanation for why you remember the past and not a future.
03:35:34
Why causes precede effects.
03:35:35
Why broken things do not spontaneously wait, what?
03:35:39
Why don't you remember the future draw?
03:35:40
Why don't you remember the future?
03:35:43
He's going to explain.
03:35:44
Go back a little bit.
03:35:45
Reassemble. Why? Time feels like has a direction.
03:35:47
Because any law requires that, as Boltzmann showed.
03:35:48
But because there are overwhelmingly more high entropy states than low entropy
03:35:50
ones, and random processes move toward the more probable.
03:35:52
That is the entire explanation for why you remember the past and not the future.
03:35:55
Why causes precede effects.
03:35:56
Why broken things do not spontaneously reassemble.
03:35:58
Why time feels like has a direction.
03:35:59
All of it is downstream.
03:36:00
The one fact the beginning was recorded
03:36:02
release one fact keep everything is identical
03:36:04
and the arrow of time despite its possible future, become indistinguishable.
03:36:07
Remember?
03:36:07
Wait, so remove the one and hypothetically.
03:36:11
No, no, it.
03:36:11
No, it's definitely not hypothetically.
03:36:13
All this stuff proved it.
03:36:14
We can go back and start it again.
03:36:16
But what he's saying is that everything that he's done, the only reason everything
03:36:19
exists, is the arrow of time, the way we perceive it.
03:36:23
But the only way, the only reason that even exists
03:36:26
is because something or someone or some started it becomes meaningless.
03:36:32
Causality collapses everything that makes time feel like
03:36:34
if we take that one thing away, then time collapses.
03:36:39
So that that one thing is so important that perhaps civilizations would make it
03:36:44
golden, worship it, and call it, I don't know,
03:36:47
the one or
03:36:49
God I depends on that single initial condition,
03:36:52
the reason the word Allah calls it the posture
03:36:54
because it's not derived from any deeper principle.
03:36:56
It is an assumption we make because the evidence
03:36:57
is consistent with it, not because any theory predicts it.
03:36:59
And I find myself sitting with a stranger at that for longer than is comfortable,
03:37:02
because what it means is that every appearance
03:37:03
you have ever had, every memory, every plan, every sense of
03:37:06
there was yesterday and there will be tomorrow.
03:37:08
It's not grounded in the law.
03:37:09
Nature is grounded in a statistical accident,
03:37:11
the beginning of everything, the directionality of your life.
03:37:13
But the a way, the entire structure before and after
03:37:16
that makes you experience coherence.
03:37:17
All of it rests on one unexplained initial condition that nobody knows anything.
03:37:20
Quite.
03:37:20
And then the question always opens answered.
03:37:23
Why was the beginning so ordered?
03:37:24
What selected that initial condition
03:37:25
out of the vast space of possible initial condition?
03:37:27
Even answers questions for theologians.
03:37:30
They always were like what was before creation,
03:37:33
this jiggling of the universe or whatever.
03:37:35
Like the only thing that started
03:37:37
the universe didn't start the Earth didn't start, the light didn't start.
03:37:40
The arrow of time started in the arrow of time that we currently exist,
03:37:45
which varies approvingly, immeasurably from here to here.
03:37:51
And offers an answer through cyclic cosmology.
03:37:53
The order beginning was a mechanical consequence of a disordered end.
03:37:55
All the previous eon
03:37:56
hawking of his one through injury time beginning was a smooth gymnast.
03:37:59
I'm not saying God anymore.
03:38:00
I'm saying the arrow of time,
03:38:03
but I'm just going to interchange it.
03:38:06
See? But I mean, none of the arrow of time.
03:38:11
No, that happened way after the arrow of time.
03:38:15
He had to prove to a group of people that he was the arrow of time.
03:38:19
So the arrow of time gave his only begotten
03:38:23
arrow of time like a little arrow of time.
03:38:26
Transition from a state where time space good.
03:38:28
But when I say that it sounds funny and comical, but it was.
03:38:32
He had to stick within the confines of this time, so he made a little shorter time.
03:38:38
Arrow of time.
03:38:39
So if as soon as you say time, it doesn't make sense
03:38:41
because that's what makes it not make sense.
03:38:43
Both involve real mathematics, but based on suggesting something about time.
03:38:46
In order to explain time, Penrose needs to have a sequence.
03:38:48
Hawking needs imaginary time to transition into real time.
03:38:50
Neither one say so. They push back one step, which is not nothing.
03:38:52
But it's not a solution either.
03:38:54
Why keep returning to is a simpler and more comfortable version of question.
03:38:56
If a low entropy beginning is not explained by any law,
03:38:58
and if the arrow of time is entirely the product, the beginning
03:39:00
and the duration of time is not a discovery of the universe,
03:39:02
it is a statement about where we happen to be in a process
03:39:04
that could, in principle, have started anywhere.
03:39:06
We experience time as moving forward because we are downstream
03:39:08
of an unusual source point, but unusual from whose perspective?
03:39:10
From the perspective of all possible initial conditions.
03:39:11
Our beginning was extraordinarily improbable.
03:39:13
Which raises the question again we do not know how to frame properly.
03:39:15
Is it possibly all because happened, or does it feel real?
03:39:17
Because we have to remember in one direction only,
03:39:19
and in the latter, if I sense
03:39:20
the past is a cognitive consequence of thermodynamics
03:39:21
rather than a direct perception of something that actually exists,
03:39:23
then what exactly are we accessing when we remember anything at all?
03:39:26
Don't we have spent decades pushing a single idea that most of us
03:39:28
colleagues found too strange to engage with seriously,
03:39:30
and that the experiment of the last decade
03:39:31
has made increasingly difficult to ignore what he called it from bit.
03:39:34
The idea is that information is not a description of physical reality.
03:39:36
It is what physical reality is made of that every particle, every field,
03:39:39
every physical quantity derives its existence
03:39:40
from answers to yes or no questions, from binary choices, from bits.
03:39:43
The universe is not
03:39:44
so what they just said is instead of the world being determined,
03:39:49
you are determined to be the world.
03:39:53
They just flipped it.
03:39:54
They just totally flipped it.
03:39:55
Electron things that can be described with information.
03:39:57
It is a collective information that we interpret things. Oh my God.
03:39:59
I say that for a moment because it is easy to let slide.
03:40:01
Past has an interesting theoretical position
03:40:02
without fully registering what it would mean if it were correct.
03:40:04
Its information is fundamental if the universe is at its deepest
03:40:07
level built from answers questions, then the question of who or what is doing.
03:40:10
The asking is not a side issue.
03:40:12
It is. I'll even be bolder.
03:40:13
It's not a list of questions in a series of questions.
03:40:15
It's one question yes or no
03:40:18
control issue a bit. It's not a bit.
03:40:20
In the absence of something, the distinctions between the two know a
03:40:22
yes or no question require something they can ask it, which means we must.
03:40:24
Framework.
03:40:25
Don't just describe physics, it makes the existence of observers
03:40:27
unnecessary feature of reality rather than accidental one.
03:40:29
And if observation is what generates the time and the excitement
03:40:31
showed, if the direction of time is a of the measurement
03:40:33
or the creation of records of the thermodynamic cost of looking,
03:40:35
then the observer is not just a witness of time.
03:40:37
The observer is part of what produces. This is not mysticism.
03:40:39
It follows from the mathematics of quantum mechanics,
03:40:41
and from the experimental results of 2013 and 2005.
03:40:43
Taken together, the marine experiment showed
03:40:45
the tiny exists only for internal observers.
03:40:47
The Oxford example showed that
03:40:48
the arrow of time emerges from the act of observation.
03:40:50
Wheeler's framework gives these results a coherent interpretation.
03:40:52
The universe at its deepest level is time.
03:40:53
A time is what it looks like inside. When something is doing the looking.
03:40:56
But here is where I genuinely observe it in a way that I do not think.
03:40:58
Is there the gap in line?
03:41:00
We can't answer the question of an afterlife if the existence
03:41:03
in the universe is timeless,
03:41:06
it just goes back to being timeless,
03:41:09
whatever that means.
03:41:10
The sending wheels picture raises a question about the
03:41:13
image.
03:41:14
I mean, it would be I don't know how it would would exactly work.
03:41:17
But hypothetically, if there was a world where there was no
03:41:21
like we lived on Earth, but
03:41:23
there was no rotation, there was no
03:41:26
sun rotate, we had light, but there was no sun rotation.
03:41:29
There was no like way to track, like general movement.
03:41:34
You know, it would just vibrate.
03:41:36
How long would it take us to get to like,
03:41:38
conceptualize time as something to worry about or consider?
03:41:41
Like,
03:41:42
well, he just said that it's so statistically improbable
03:41:47
that it probably would never happen.
03:41:50
But it did.
03:41:55
Because I cannot resolve if observers produce time
03:41:57
and the arrow of time require something that measured.
03:42:00
When you say
03:42:01
movement, what you just mean the
03:42:04
jiggling of a photon and proton.
03:42:06
And I guess so, captain crunch time.
03:42:09
I don't know what he's saying.
03:42:09
Stuff about the beginning.
03:42:14
It would be the beginning of time would be the Big Bang,
03:42:16
because that's a point that the beginning of the arrow of time,
03:42:20
which is only our perception. Bang.
03:42:22
Supposedly.
03:42:23
But that doesn't make sure the other.
03:42:26
But so you could, as soon as you label it something defined as specific
03:42:29
as the big bang, people start say, well, it didn't really explode,
03:42:32
didn't really make a bang. Noise.
03:42:34
And I know I sound stupid, but I sound as stupid as an atheist arguing
03:42:38
against the possibility of something out away from the singularity.
03:42:44
I'm moving toward it.
03:42:46
I don't know about you.
03:42:47
You think the singularity?
03:42:48
Singularity already happened and we're now moving away from it?
03:42:51
Well, that would wait.
03:42:52
Yeah, sure, but we're going to go back to it again.
03:42:54
We're going to go back and start again,
03:42:56
because then observers had this before time had a direction.
03:42:59
But observers of physical systems, physical systems exist in time,
03:43:02
something the existing time cannot be prior to time.
03:43:03
The logic seems to circle back on itself.
03:43:05
Movement becomes most interesting
03:43:06
and I do not think this is a failure of framework.
03:43:07
I think I might be pointing something about the relationship
03:43:09
between time, an observation,
03:43:10
and a current concept not equipped to describe cleanly.
03:43:11
Wheeler himself. The question will form near the end.
03:43:14
As equipped, the universe require observers
03:43:15
in order to equip not just a future, a past.
03:43:18
His data was suggested because observation can
03:43:21
reach
03:43:21
backward and determine how a particle behaved, and the past
03:43:24
is not fixed until something in the present forces it to be fixed,
03:43:26
which means the past might not be a record of what happened.
03:43:28
It might be a construction, a simple backward from present shape.
03:43:30
My observation that is ever could.
03:43:32
And if that's true, then I think what time is
03:43:34
maybe inseparable for asking what memory is,
03:43:36
for asking what it means to know
03:43:37
that something happened from asking, well, yes, you, just because of our concept of
03:43:40
the arrow of time is wrong.
03:43:41
What if we started at a point of our existence
03:43:43
and we all of a sudden went and have to go backwards through this?
03:43:47
We just perceive it as forward, and then when it's over, just go.
03:43:52
We get to go to go onward.
03:43:57
It's probably
03:43:58
the difference between the past and future is a future of reality.
03:44:00
Or if it reminds, embedded in reality is memory not just a record of time?
03:44:03
Or is memory the thing that makes time real in the first place?
03:44:05
Here is where we actually are,
03:44:06
not what textbooks say we are, where we actually are.
03:44:08
We have the most accurate clocks in the history of measurement,
03:44:10
and they are telling us the concept of nature.
03:44:11
It may not be concerned we have only science.
03:44:12
Showing the arrow of time is not in the laws of physics,
03:44:14
but in the act of observation.
03:44:15
We have a good of the entire universe that contains
03:44:17
no time, that we have a paltry evidence. The causality is not absolute.
03:44:20
The quantum transitions
03:44:20
have duration determined by geometry rather than the flow of time,
03:44:22
and the time can be reflected on a temporal boundary.
03:44:24
We have two measurements the expansion rate, the universe.
03:44:26
Disagreeing by five sigma,
03:44:27
we have the recipe which time emerges from thermodynamic capacity
03:44:30
and a competing control time of thing.
03:44:32
And both are consistent with the available data.
03:44:33
And we have an ensemble at the center of all of it.
03:44:35
Why do the universe begin in such an ordered state
03:44:36
that none of the frameworks matter?
03:44:38
What we don't have is a clear, consistent,
03:44:39
experimentally confirmed account of what time
03:44:41
is, and I want to do that for a moment rather than move past it too quickly,
03:44:43
because I think there is a way of hearing that sentence.
03:44:45
It makes it sound like a temporary situation,
03:44:46
a gap in knowledge that will be closed by the next generation of experiments,
03:44:50
the next theoretical work through the next decade of data
03:44:52
from axes or DC or the nuclear clocks.
03:44:53
And maybe it will be,
03:44:54
but I'm not sure that is the right way to read where we are,
03:44:56
because the deeper the excitements go, the more the question is.
03:44:58
Rather than converging,
03:44:59
every result was supposed to clarify the nature plans produce
03:45:01
a new version of the puzzle, and more precisely, we measure.
03:45:03
And more precisely, we can see that we don't understand what we are measuring.
03:45:05
What strikes me about all of this, and I keep coming back to this,
03:45:08
is that the question of what time is
03:45:09
has turned out to be the same question as one observer is what information is,
03:45:12
what past is what it means for something to exist rather than not exist?
03:45:15
These are not questions that happen to be related.
03:45:17
They seem to be the same question apart from different reactions.
03:45:19
And it's right that the answer to witness
03:45:20
will not come from a better clock or a more precise measurement alone.
03:45:23
It will require a new way of thinking about what
03:45:24
physical reality is at the level where time, information and observation need.
03:45:27
We don't have that yet.
03:45:28
We have pieces of it scattered across 100 experiments, a theory
03:45:30
pointing in roughly the same direction with by connecting.
03:45:32
I don't know what the theory will look like when it arrives.
03:45:34
I don't know whether it is all the question of time,
03:45:36
the way Hawking Penrose's all the question of what came before the Big Bang
03:45:38
by showing the question was malformed, or whether it will answer it directly.
03:45:42
I do not know where the time will turn out to be fundamental or emergent, real
03:45:44
or relational, a river or heat or something we do not yet
03:45:46
have a metaphor for.
03:45:47
What I do know is that every experiment running right now
03:45:49
aces on the space station, the nuclear clocks advance like a boulder.
03:45:51
The quantum network protocols being built in order to reach across three continents
03:45:54
is probing the same boundary from a different angle.
03:45:56
The answer, if there is one, is somewhere in the data
03:45:57
that is being at right now, or it's somewhere in the data
03:45:59
that will force us to ask a question we have not thought to ask yet.
03:46:01
Either way, the clocks are running, the numbers still do not add up,
03:46:04
and somewhere in the gap between what the measurements show
03:46:06
and what the theory predicts, the actual nature of time is waiting.
03:46:08
Whether we are close to finding it or just beginning.
03:46:10
Understand how deep the search goes that I genuinely do not know.
03:46:14
I don't know either.
03:46:15
I know we have historic examples of our pirate victories.
03:46:19
The battle of Ascii loom in 279 BC,
03:46:23
battle of Chancellorsville in 1863.
03:46:25
The Battle of Mill quit in 1709,
03:46:29
the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775, the Battle of Peleliu
03:46:33
in 1944, Operation Barbarossa in 1941, the Tet Offensive in 1968.
03:46:39
The Russell legal cases,
03:46:41
for example, like winning a lawsuit for $10,000,
03:46:44
but you spent 15,000 on legal fees,
03:46:47
or if a business successfully acquires a competitor
03:46:49
but overleveraged the company into bankruptcy or in sports,
03:46:53
winning a regular season game, but losing your star player to a season
03:46:56
ending injury would be a I think it's a it's a good life lesson.
03:46:59
Pyrrhic victory.
03:47:07
I think I got like ten minutes into it and I was like, I'll finish this up later.
03:47:12
Would you rather would you rather.
03:47:14
Oops.
03:47:16
That's usually no.
03:47:18
Haha.
03:47:21
Okay.
03:47:24
All right. I'll just do this.
03:47:27
He was at Royal or I'm.
03:47:30
That we wouldn't watch.
03:47:31
Do we have a topic next week? Carrie's very susceptible.
03:47:34
If you just name a topic, we we can do it.
03:47:37
Pull that up, Brady.
03:47:43
No, no.
03:47:44
Tomic.
03:47:49
What's the topic here?
03:47:50
Pretty grotesque.
03:47:52
Oh, okay.
03:47:56
Oh, boy. And.
03:48:02
I'm. I'm.
03:48:07
You're absolutely critical.
03:48:10
So my hot dog buns getting all.
03:48:15
And then this bitch going all the way to Lake Michigan on this West coast trip.
03:48:20
If I had my choice.
03:48:21
It is the blues for the.
03:48:22
But if I had to choose, I'd take the blood over the bulls
03:48:27
and creep in on a whole new level. Fun.
03:48:30
Stay up to this.
03:48:31
Up there you get some new era, step to your preschool and shoot em up with
03:48:34
tear up them and by pink, no pink rag tied around my face so they can't see me.
03:48:39
Go make this forgot, nigga suck my dick.
03:48:41
Literally no homo until the show and pick up a photo of Bowie
03:48:46
I'm a damn old triple old triple triple I'll be your punk ass like a pimple
03:48:51
hop my Colorado on I drove all the way to Michigan State.
03:48:55
Shoot up the whole place,
03:48:56
gangsta rave and take their mouth shut so they can't speak on the day.
03:49:00
Would cause they dead for my AK 47.
03:49:03
Let out another chick to my street cred.
03:49:05
That shit's like a 9.6.
03:49:07
I want a gangster Olympic bitch on my crib.
03:49:10
Nigga I'm a blood, I'm bipolar.
03:49:13
So I keep on racks hanging from my pocket.
03:49:15
My Glock shoved in my waistband.
03:49:17
Sometimes when I get a boner.
03:49:18
Issues in my pants, not my gun.
03:49:20
My cock cold still makes me nuts.
03:49:22
Now of my fantasies I'm beginning to see that shit's like my medicine.
03:49:27
I'm better than any man other in the same rhymes at this exact time.
03:49:31
I'ma rhyme.
03:49:31
Feel like I said previously, I'm in the five, eight, six.
03:49:35
Used to be the 313 motherfucking go dating spinning, listening in the sun.
03:49:39
Got my Adidas on Cruisin I 69.
03:49:44
In a lake, Michigan I
03:49:46
crip some
03:49:47
name some thugs, crime and guns, whores and drugs.
03:49:50
Take your pocket, front door like it I got a gun in my drawer.
03:49:53
And I cock it like Mr.
03:49:55
Swivel I suck, there's like some lame shit.
03:49:57
Ravens fly city trannies and homeless ghettos.
03:50:01
Hope this was a dumb motherfucker that even broke this straight
03:50:05
out of royal.
03:50:06
Oh, God. No way. K just a ball talk.
03:50:09
No fucking joke.
03:50:10
As I walk this tightrope strung out on the dough.
03:50:13
Bitch in a slit your throat rough neck, gangster murder and shit like that.
03:50:17
Crack, crack shit past your mama ahead 40 over.
03:50:21
We got me laid on him.
03:50:23
She's grave I spit Desert Eagle on my hip.
03:50:25
Plug in a pistol, whip a stupid bitch in 20 shit.
03:50:28
Not taking any bullshit from anyone in a uniform.
03:50:31
I cop in a city hall.
03:50:32
I blast all my homeboys for me.
03:50:36
You never see me on cops cause I got a way.
03:50:38
Not because I was faster, but because I had a black girl.
03:50:42
That bitch ass Bobo had to come in.
03:50:44
So now I'm a hundred miles and running, nigga, most Crips ain't shit
03:50:48
when Joe comes. Got in I'm missing my trick.
03:50:50
Hoes out the door.
03:50:51
Counting my money on the floor.
03:50:52
White America knows now what's in store.
03:50:55
Shit, I made a preacher swear.
03:50:56
Only it'll make more and more money all round my store.
03:51:00
Case. Out the back door.
03:51:01
Push out.
03:51:02
Ahoy!
03:51:03
Hear me roar.
03:51:04
King Kong's got nothing on me.
03:51:07
Just a day in the life sea.
03:51:09
So far the police a relief.
03:51:11
Time's almost run out on me. And Dirty Mac.
03:51:13
Gangster in the knee is all this matter.
03:51:15
Is niggas ever going to be.
03:51:17
We gonna be
03:51:20
Christmas tramps and thugs, me guns, horse and drugs.
03:51:24
Pick your pocket, front door, lock it I got a gun in my drawer.
03:51:27
And I got it like this. Just like a outside socket.
03:51:30
Like some lame shit.
03:51:31
Ravens fly at it.
03:51:33
Trainees and homeless ghettos.
03:51:35
Homeless dumb motherfucker that even wrote this.
03:51:40
It needs to treat for
03:51:41
you or something you can try while in the can.
03:51:45
Get a basket full of jelly beans, shove it in your ass as many as you can.
03:51:49
I'll bust a cap in my own eyes. That'll show you.
03:51:52
If you're not hitting that do pass.
03:51:54
I smoke some dudes.
03:51:55
I'll get your sag on.
03:51:56
Put your hat on backwards. Leave the tag on.
03:51:59
Walk around like your back hurts.
03:52:00
Get a job at exactly the same spot your dad works at.
03:52:03
Porn. So far it starts worse and further.
03:52:05
But for the girl
03:52:06
I'm calling from jail and murder calling a certain to confirm or deny life.
03:52:11
This is my reply slyly.
03:52:13
I'm not trying to get hard.
03:52:15
I did that a little while ago.
03:52:17
That's why my one last thing you want to do is screw with this girl.
03:52:22
Last thing you want to hear is we're coming for you.
03:52:24
Last thing I say you do is make a healthy brew.
03:52:27
I don't want to. What you gonna do?
03:52:30
Stars like parsley.
03:52:32
Marty, would you foul play? She.
03:52:39
Bad. Got.
03:52:48
Congratulations for the University of Michigan Wolverines
03:52:51
basketball team for the year championship yesterday.
03:52:56
Kind of.
03:52:57
You don't.
03:53:06
We'll be ready to crush the practice.